JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 495-502
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Comparison of the in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones against respiratory pathogens and their abilities to select fluoroquinolone resistance
Department of Microbiology, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
Received 18 September 2001; returned 1 March 2002; revised 12 April 2002; accepted 19 June 2002
In this study the in vitro activities and pharmacodynamic properties of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin were compared on recently isolated respiratory pathogens and strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae with known mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance. In addition, the resistance selection frequencies of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin on three recently isolated respiratory pathogens and four strains of S. pneumoniae with known mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance were investigated. The four fluoroquinolones had similar activities against both Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC90s 0.0150.06 mg/L) and Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90s 0.0080.03 mg/L). More marked differences in activity were noted with S. pneumoniae, with MIC90s of 0.25, 1, 0.5 and 0.03 mg/L for moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin, respectively. With the S. pneumoniae strains, the four fluoroquinolones exhibited similar concentration-dependent timekill kinetics. The resistance selection frequencies of levofloxacin were higher than those of moxifloxacin at concentrations equivalent to those at the end of the dosing interval. Therefore moxifloxacin may have less of an impact on the development of resistance than levofloxacin.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-121-507-4255; Fax: +44-121-551-7763; E-mail: r.wise{at}bham.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Alou, M.-J. Gimenez, D. Sevillano, L. Aguilar, F. Cafini, O. Echeverria, E. Perez-Trallero, and J. Prieto A pharmacodynamic approach to antimicrobial activity in serum and epithelial lining fluid against in vivo-selected Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants and association with clinical failure in pneumonia J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2006; 58(2): 349 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Soley, A. Arguedas, W. Porras, S. Guevara, C. Loaiza, A. Perez, G. Rincon, M. Schultz, J. Arguedas, and R. Brilla In Vitro Activities of Levofloxacin and Comparable Agents against Middle Ear Fluid, Nasopharyngeal, and Oropharyngeal Pathogens Obtained from Costa Rican Children with Recurrent Otitis Media or Failing Other Antibiotic Therapy Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 3056 - 3058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Azoulay-Dupuis, J. P. Bedos, J. Mohler, P. Moine, C. Cherbuliez, G. Peytavin, B. Fantin, and T. Kohler Activity of Gemifloxacin against Quinolone-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains In Vitro and in a Mouse Pneumonia Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2005; 49(3): 1046 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Morrissey and G. Tillotson Activity of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 144 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Pletz, P. Petzold, A. Allen, O. Burkhardt, and H. Lode Effect of Calcium Carbonate on Bioavailability of Orally Administered Gemifloxacin Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2003; 47(7): 2158 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

