Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuursted, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuursted, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 421-424
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Significance of low-level resistance to ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae and the effect of increased dosage of ciprofloxacin in vivo using the rat granuloma pouch model

Kurt Fuursted1,* and Helga Schumacher2

1 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Kommunehospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C; 2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Viborg Sygehus, DK-8800, Viborg, Denmark

Received 21 November 2001; returned 3 April 2002; revised 24 May 2002; accepted 17 June 2002

This study was designed to compare the killing effect of ciprofloxacin on strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae with different MICs of ciprofloxacin in vivo using the rat granuloma pouch infection model. Five different strains were used: one ciprofloxacin-susceptible strain (MIC 0.06 mg/L); one strain highly resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC 8 mg/L); and three nalidixic acid-resistant strains with low-level resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC 0.25–0.5 mg/L). The efficacy of ciprofloxacin was evaluated 3 h after bacterial challenge (treating an acute infection) or after 3 days (treating a late infection) with a single intraperitoneal injection of ciprofloxacin (40 and 200 mg/kg). Ciprofloxacin was bactericidal against both growing K. pneumoniae (acute infection model) and non-growing K. pneumoniae (late infection model), but the extent of killing was significantly higher on growing bacteria and against ciprofloxacin-susceptible K. pneumoniae. A peak concentration of ciprofloxacin, at the infection site, <3 x MIC was not sufficient for optimal bacterial elimination. However, it was possible to compensate for the lower killing in low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant K. pneumoniae by increasing the dosage of ciprofloxacin from 40 to 200 mg/kg, consistent with the higher MIC.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +45-89-49-35-25; Fax: +45-89-49-35-50; E-mail: fuursted{at}rocketmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. Allou, E. Cambau, L. Massias, F. Chau, and B. Fantin
Impact of Low-Level Resistance to Fluoroquinolones Due to qnrA1 and qnrS1 Genes or a gyrA Mutation on Ciprofloxacin Bactericidal Activity in a Murine Model of Escherichia coli Urinary Tract Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4292 - 4297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.