Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croisier, D.
Right arrow Articles by Portier, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croisier, D.
Right arrow Articles by Portier, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 349-360
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of simulated human-like treatment with levofloxacin on experimental pneumonia induced with penicillin-resistant pneumococci with various susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones

Delphine Croisier, Pascal Chavanet*, Catherine Lequeu, Abderrahmane Ahanou, Anne Nierlich, Catherine Neuwirth, Lionel Piroth, Michel Duong, Marielle Buisson and Henri Portier

Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Microbiologie Médicale et Moléculaire (EA562), Hôpital du Bocage, BP 1542, 21034 Dijon Cedex, France

Received 4 February 2002; returned 29 April 2002; revised 15 May 2002; accepted 30 May 2002

Newer fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, have shown an enhanced in vitro and in vivo activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infections. The frequency of S. pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to quinolones, although currently low, raises the question of the therapeutic efficacy of levofloxacin on infection due to such strains. We used an animal model of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia using six strains with various levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in rabbits to induce pneumonia, and simulated a human-like treatment of 500 mg twice a day for 48 h. Strains’ susceptibility profiles for ciprofloxacin and levofloxaxin were (ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin MIC, mg/L; genotype): 0.5/0.5 (Cip0.5), 2/1 (Cip2), 4/1.75 (Cip4), 8/1.75 (parC mutation) (Cip8), 10/2 (parC mutation) (Cip10), 64/16 (parC and gyrA mutations) (Cip64), respectively. All the strains induced a crude pneumonia in all rabbits. Significant bacterial reductions at the end of treatment in lung and spleen were observed for the four former strains (P < 0.05) but not for the latter two. An AUC/MIC ratio of at least 32 identified 95% of an at least bacteriostatic effect (P = 0.038) and 76% of a bactericidal effect (P = 0.09). Mutants were detected in treated animals infected with strains harbouring parC mutations (Cip8 and Cip10) and when the AUC/MIC ratio was between 13 and 31. We conclude that levofloxacin is effective against experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci with MIC < 1.5 mg/L, ineffective on experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci with MIC >= 2 mg/L, and could be associated with the appearance of mutants when a parC mutation is pre-existing.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33-3-8029-3637; Fax: +33-3-8029-3638; E-mail: p.chavanet{at}planetb.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. Chiavolini, G. Pozzi, and S. Ricci
Animal Models of Streptococcus pneumoniae Disease
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2008; 21(4): 666 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. A. DeRyke, X. Du, and D. P. Nicolau
Evaluation of bacterial kill when modelling the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against parC-containing isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 601 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J.-W. Decousser, I. Methlouthi, P. Pina, A. Collignon, P. Allouch, and on behalf of the ColBVH Study Group
New Real-Time PCR Assay Using Locked Nucleic Acid Probes To Assess Prevalence of ParC Mutations in Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from France.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1594 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Croisier, M. Etienne, L. Piroth, E. Bergoin, C. Lequeu, H. Portier, and P. Chavanet
In vivo pharmacodynamic efficacy of gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental model of pneumonia: impact of the low levels of fluoroquinolone resistance on the enrichment of resistant mutants
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2004; 54(3): 640 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Croisier, M. Etienne, E. Bergoin, P.-E. Charles, C. Lequeu, L. Piroth, H. Portier, and P. Chavanet
Mutant Selection Window in Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin Treatments of Experimental Pneumococcal Pneumonia in a Rabbit Model of Human Therapy
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2004; 48(5): 1699 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. R. Florea, P. R. Tessier, C. Zhang, C. H. Nightingale, and D. P. Nicolau
Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin at Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Drug Concentrations against Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2004; 48(4): 1215 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Rubinstein
Reply to: Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of simulated human-like treatment with levofloxacin on experimental pneumonia induced with penicillin-resistant pneumococci with various susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2003; 51(5): 1307 - 1308.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.