Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 49, 201-204
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Brief report |
Antibiotic resistance: effect of different criteria for classifying isolates as duplicates on apparent resistance frequencies
Department of Infection, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
Objective: To investigate the effect of screening specimens and different criteria for exclusion of duplicate isolates when surveillance of antimicrobial resistances is performed.
Materials and methods: Trends in resistance were analysed for recent isolates of selected organisms from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals with the use of various criteria for the exclusion of duplicates, including time since the last isolate and antibiogram pattern, and the effect of excluding screening specimens.
Results: There was a significant difference of about 8% in the apparent frequency of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients if the time limit for duplicates was set at 5 rather than 30 days; it was about 10% if a 5 day limit was compared with a 365 day limit. There was also a significant difference, of 6–10%, in apparent resistance frequencies if isolates from screening specimens were excluded. Apparent gentamicin resistance rates in Klebsiella spp. varied between 11% and 28%, and the number of apparent patient isolates of gentamicinresistant organisms varied by up to 35%, depending on the duplicate exclusion criteria chosen. Effects were smaller, though still significant, for vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus spp. There was little effect for amoxicillin or cefuroxime resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from general practitioners, where the proportion of duplicates was small.
Conclusion: Improved surveillance of antibiotic resistance is needed. However, care needs to be taken in setting the criteria for classifying isolates as duplicates and in comparing results where these criteria may be different or unknown.
* Corresponding author. Tel +44-20-7922-8393; Fax: +44-20-7928-0739; E-mail kevin.shannon{at}kcl.ac.uk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Sundqvist and G. Kahlmeter Effect of excluding duplicate isolates of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in a 14 year consecutive database J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 913 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Avoiding antibacterial overuse in primary care DTB, April 1, 2007; 45(4): 25 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Nathwani and on behalf of Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) S Antimicrobial prescribing policy and practice in Scotland: recommendations for good antimicrobial practice in acute hospitals J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1189 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Green Selection of an Empiric Antibiotic Regimen for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Using a Unit and Culture-Type Specific Antibiogram J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 296 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Zapantis, M. K. Lacy, R. T. Horvat, D. Grauer, B. J. Barnes, B. O'Neal, and R. Couldry Nationwide Antibiogram Analysis Using NCCLS M39-A Guidelines J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 43(6): 2629 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-O. Lee, Y. K. Cho, S.-Y. Kim, E. S. Lee, S. Y. Park, and Y.-H. Seo Comparison of Trends of Resistance Rates over 3 Years Calculated from Results for All Isolates and for the First Isolate of a Given Species from a Patient J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2004; 42(10): 4776 - 4779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Magee and on behalf of the Welsh Antibiotic Study Group Effects of duplicate and screening isolates on surveillance of community and hospital antibiotic resistance J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Halstead, N. Gomez, and Y. S. McCarter Reality of Developing a Community-Wide Antibiogram J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 42(1): 1 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. T. Horvat, N. E. Klutman, M. K. Lacy, D. Grauer, and M. Wilson Effect of Duplicate Isolates of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Antibiogram Data J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2003; 41(10): 4611 - 4616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Rodriguez, E. Sirvent, J. M. Lopez-Lozano, and G. Royo Criteria of time and antibiotic susceptibility in the elimination of duplicates when calculating resistance frequencies J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2003; 52(1): 132 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. P. Shannon and G. L. French Validation of the NCCLS proposal to use results only from the first isolate of a species per patient in the calculation of susceptibility frequencies J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2002; 50(6): 965 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|