Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheat, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wheat, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 1-4
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Supplement

History and development of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methodology

Philip F. Wheat1,*

1 Mast Laboratories, Mast Group Limited, Mast House, Derby Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 1EA, UK

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is performed daily on bacterial isolates in clinical laboratories. The techniques employed are often taken for granted. This paper traces the history and development of some methods still in common use for routine AST, e.g. disc diffusion and agar dilution. It was quickly recognized by early investigators that there were many variables affecting the results of these tests. Consequently, there was recognition (as early as the late 1950s) that standardization of these techniques was required. This need has led to many organizations producing standardized AST methodologies. Although some disc diffusion techniques that generated results within 4–6 h were described, most relied on 18–24 h incubation before a result was available. The clinical and economic pressures for rapid methods with low labour input led to the development of semi-automated and automated AST methodologies in the 1970s. Until 10 years ago, AST techniques relied on phenotypically testing the bacteria isolated. However, to increase the speed and reliability of resistance testing, the use of a genotypic approach has been advocated. The limitations and benefits of this new approach are discussed.

Notes

* Tel: +44-151-933-7277; Fax: +44-151-933-2400; E-mail: pfwheat{at}mastgrp.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.