Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 931
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Correspondence

Determination of MICs in the routine laboratory

Pramod M. Shah,*

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Sir,

In the age of automation and commercially available microtitre plates for MIC determination, more and more laboratories use these methods, although the report of the Working Party on . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Jacqueline, E. Batard, L. Perez, D. Boutoille, A. Hamel, J. Caillon, M.-F. Kergueris, G. Potel, and D. Bugnon
In Vivo Efficacy of Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing of Linezolid Compared to Vancomycin in a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Endocarditis Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2002; 46(12): 3706 - 3711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]