Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cordero, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pachon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cordero, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pachon, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 527-534
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Cefepime versus cefotaxime for empirical treatment of bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients: an open, randomized trial

E. Corderoa,*, E. Bouzab, I. Ruizc and J. Pachona

a Infectious Diseases Services, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla; b Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid; c Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Valle d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

An open, randomized, multicentre clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of cefepime 2 g iv bd (2 g tds daily in cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia) with cefotaxime 2 g iv tds, in the empirical treatment of bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients. The primary end-point was effectiveness after 3–5 days of treatment, taking success to be when the study drug was continued during this period of time. Clinical and bacteriological responses at end of treatment (EOT) were also evaluated. Analyses of the intention-to-treat population (n = 160) and the as-per-protocol groups (n = 150) were carried out. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to sex, age, HIV status and degree of severity of pneumonia. The primary end-point for cefepime was considered successful for the intention-to-treat and as-per-protocol groups in 85.7% and 93.5% of cases, respectively, and for cefotaxime, in 77.6% and 80.8% of cases, respectively (P = 0.22 and P = 0.02). In the as-per-protocol group, cefotaxime treatment was independently related to failure at the primary end-point. A satisfactory clinical response in the intention-to-treat population was observed in 83.3% of cefepime and 82.9% of cefotaxime patients. Bacteriological cure was obtained in 100% of evaluable cefepime and 93.4% of evaluable cefotaxime patients at EOT. Safety of the study drugs was comparable in both treatment groups. Cefepime 2 g iv bd was at least as effective and as well tolerated as cefotaxime 2 g iv tds in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients.

* Corresponding author. Tel/Fax: +34-95-501-2377; E-mail: mcordero{at}cica.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.