Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sugden, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sugden, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 47, 171-175
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In situ measurement of linezolid and vancomycin concentrations in intravascular catheter-associated biofilm

Mark H. Wilcox,*, Peter Kite, Kerry Mills and Sarah Sugden

Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds and The General Infirmary, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

We describe a new method for the measurement of antimicrobial concentrations in the biofilm associated with the endoluminal surface of intravascular catheters. We quantified endoluminal planktonic bacteria in haemodialysis catheters using the acridine orange method on catheter blood. After catheter removal, separate lumens were perfused in vitro with either vancomycin or linezolid to simulate in vivo antibiotic infusion. Biofilm was recovered using endoluminal brushes, weighed and assayed by fluoroimmunoassay for vancomycin and by bioassay for linezolid. Viable bacteria were counted by serial dilution and agar plating. Biofilm had measurable amounts of vancomycin in 11/11 catheter lumens post-infusion (0.3–18.2 mg biofilm per lumen, mean 6.8 mg; vancomycin concentration 0.2–89 mg/g biofilm, median 19 mg/g). By comparison, linezolid was detected in 4/11 catheter lumens post-infusion (0.5–18.1 mg biofilm per lumen, mean 5.9 mg; linezolid concentration 0.9–6.1 mg/g biofilm, median 1.5 mg/g). Percentage reductions in biofilm-associated bacterial counts post-antibiotic were 84–100%, median 95% (vancomycin) and 0–98%, median 91% (linezolid). We found a significant difference (P = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test) in vancomycin concentrations in coagulase-negative staphylococcal biofilm (median 17.0 mg/g, mean 27.9 mg/g) compared with glycopeptide levels found in biofilm associated with other microorganisms (median 5.5 mg/g, mean 6.9 mg/g). Biofilm concentrations of vancomycin are generally higher than linezolid after antibiotic infusion, which can be explained partly by glycopeptide binding to glycocalyx. Neither antibiotic achieved consistent 100% kill of biofilm bacteria after single infusions, even when a very high concentration was present. The endoluminal brush technique can be used to measure antibiotic concentration in intravascular catheter-associated biofilm in situ. This approach can be exploited to measure biofilm antibiotic concentrations in vivo, without the need for catheter removal.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-113-233-5596; Fax: +44-113-233-5649; E-mail: markwi{at}pathology.leeds.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. P. Levine
Clinical experience with daptomycin: bacteraemia and endocarditis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii35 - iii39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
R. Ghiselli, A. Giacometti, O. Cirioni, F. Mocchegiani, C. Silvestri, F. Orlando, W. Kamysz, A. Licci, P. Nadolski, A. Della Vittoria, et al.
Pretreatment With the Protegrin IB-367 Affects Gram-Positive Biofilm and Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Linezolid in Animal Models of Central Venous Catheter Infection
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 2007; 31(6): 463 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. L. LaPlante and L. A. Mermel
In vitro activity of daptomycin and vancomycin lock solutions on staphylococcal biofilms in a central venous catheter model
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2239 - 2246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. I. Raad, H. A. Hanna, M. Boktour, G. Chaiban, R. Y. Hachem, T. Dvorak, R. Lewis, and B. E. Murray
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium: Catheter Colonization, esp Gene, and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Biofilm
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2005; 49(12): 5046 - 5050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. P. Wiederhold, E. A. Coyle, I. I. Raad, R. A. Prince, and R. E. Lewis
Antibacterial activity of linezolid and vancomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of Gram-positive catheter-related bacteraemia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2005; 55(5): 792 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Curtin, M. Cormican, G. Fleming, J. Keelehan, and E. Colleran
Linezolid Compared with Eperezolid, Vancomycin, and Gentamicin in an In Vitro Model of Antimicrobial Lock Therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis Central Venous Catheter-Related Biofilm Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2003; 47(10): 3145 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. Gander, K. Hayward, and R. Finch
An investigation of the antimicrobial effects of linezolid on bacterial biofilms utilizing an in vitro pharmacokinetic model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2002; 49(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.