Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amoxycillin Bronchitis Study Group, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amoxycillin Bronchitis Study Group, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 47, 67-76
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing the efficacy and safety of amoxycillin 1 g bd with amoxycillin 500 mg tds in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

A. Georgopoulosa, M. Borekb,*, W. Ridlb and The Amoxycillin Bronchitis Study Group{dagger}

a Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chemotherapy, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna; b International Medical Department, Biochemie GmbH, A-6250 Kundl, Austria

This randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of amoxycillin 1 g bd with amoxycillin 500 mg tds in 395 patients with a clinical diag- nosis of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Patients were treated for 10 days and were assessed during therapy (days 3–5), after the end of therapy (days 12–15) and at follow up (days 28–35). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, clinical success rates at the end of therapy were 86.6% (162/187 patients) and 85.6% (161/188 patients) in the bd and tds group, respectively. In the per-protocol (PP) subgroup, the success rates were 89.1% (156/175) and 92.6% (150/162), respectively. The clinical recurrence rates at follow up were, in the ITT and PP populations, respectively, 14.2% (20/141) and 13.4% (18/134) in the bd group, and 12.6% (18/143) and 13.7% (18/131) in the tds group. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) confirmed the clinical equivalence of the two dosage regimens in the ITT and PP populations. Two hundred and nineteen patients from the clinically evaluable ITT population had at least one pathogen isolated at baseline and were evaluable for bacteriological efficacy. Bacteriological success at the end of therapy was obtained in 76.2% (83/109) of patients in the bd group, and 73.7% (81/110) of patients in the tds group (95% CI: –9 to 14%). The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events in the safety evaluable patients were gastrointestinal symptoms, which occurred in 11.2% (22/197) in the bd group and 11.6% (23/198) in the tds group. Amoxycillin 1 g bd is clinically and bacteriologically as effective as amoxycillin 500 mg tds in the treatment of AECB, and the two dosage regimens show a similar safety profile.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +43-5338-200-2868; Fax: +43-5338-200-407; E-mail: michael.borek{at}gx.novartis.com

{dagger} Members of the Amoxycillin Bronchitis Study Group are listed in the Acknowledgements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Sohy, C. Pilette, M.S. Niederman, and Y. Sibille
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and antibiotics: what studies are still needed?
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2002; 19(5): 966 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.