Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houlihan, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houlihan, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 46, 79-86
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and ampicillin alone and in combination with gentamicin once daily or thrice daily against Enterococcus faecalis in an in vitro infection model

Heather H. Houlihana, Daniela P. Stokesb and Michael J. Rybaka,b,*

a The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital/University Health Center and College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, 4201 St Antoine; b Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA

We compared the pharmacodynamic activities of vancomycin and ampicillin with or without gentamicin once daily or thrice daily in an in vitro infection model with fibrin–platelet clots (FPCs) infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Antibiotics were administered as a bolus to simulate human pharmacokinetics with regimens consisting of vancomycin 1 g q12h, ampicillin 2 g q6h and gentamicin 1.3 mg/kg q8h and 5 mg/kg qd. Model experiments were performed in duplicate over 72 h. FPCs were removed from the models in triplicate at 0, 8, 24, 32, 48 and 72 h, weighed, homogenized, diluted and plated to determine colony counts. Additional FPCs were removed at over 72 h post-antibiotic dose to determine antibiotic concentrations. The inoculum density at 72 h was used to compare bactericidal activity between the regimens. Overall, all antibiotic regimens containing either ampicillin or vancomycin significantly (P < 0.01) decreased the bacterial load at 72 h compared with the growth control although monotherapy regimens with either vancomycin or gentamicin had little impact. Ampicillin was superior to vancomycin with or without the addition of gentamicin (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in reduction of bacterial density at 72 h between the combination of ampicillin or vancomycin plus gentamicin q8h and ampicillin or vancomycin plus gentamicin once daily. This was despite achieving unmeasurable FPC gentamicin concentrations after the 8 h time point during the once-daily aminoglycoside regimen. Vancomycin plus gentamicin either every 8 h or once daily was significantly (P < 0.01) better than vancomycin alone. Ampicillin plus either of the two gentamicin regimens was also better than ampicillin alone but this did not reach statistical significance. Our data suggest that once-daily gentamicin in combination with ampicillin or vancomycin demonstrates equivalent bacterial reductions to combination therapy with thrice-daily gentamicin. Once-daily aminoglycoside combination therapy for the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis warrants further investigation.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-313-745-4554; Fax: +1-313-993-2522; E-mail: mrybak{at}dmc.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Cha, W. J. Brown, and M. J. Rybak
Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2003; 47(12): 3960 - 3963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Cha, R. G. Grucz Jr., and M. J. Rybak
Daptomycin Dose-Effect Relationship against Resistant Gram-Positive Organisms
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2003; 47(5): 1598 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. C. Graham and F. K. Gould
Role of aminoglycosides in the treatment of bacterial endocarditis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2002; 49(3): 437 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Gavalda, P. Lopez, T. Martin, X. Gomis, J. L. Ramirez, C. Azuaje, B. Almirante, and A. Pahissa
Efficacy of Ceftriaxone and Gentamicin Given Once a Day by Using Human-Like Pharmacokinetics in Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Endocarditis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2002; 46(2): 378 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. López, J. Gavaldà, M. T. Martin, B. Almirante, X. Gomis, C. Azuaje, N. Borrell, L. Pou, V. Falcó, C. Pigrau, et al.
Efficacy of Teicoplanin-Gentamicin Given Once a Day on the Basis of Pharmacokinetics in Humans for Treatment of Enterococcal Experimental Endocarditis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2001; 45(5): 1387 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. L. Akins and M. J. Rybak
Bactericidal Activities of Two Daptomycin Regimens against Clinical Strains of Glycopeptide Intermediate-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2001; 45(2): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.