Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Rahman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Rahman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 46, 148-149
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Correspondence

Comparison of the Etest and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of resistant clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae from Saudi Arabia

Eyad M. Abdel-Rahmana, Nashat A. Ismaelb and Ronald A. Dixona,*

a University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; b King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Sir,

We read with interest the article by Rowe et al.1 concerning the use of the Etest to determine the susceptibility of respiratory isolates from the Central African Republic. The availability of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?