Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 285-293
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

A comparison of antimicrobial resistance rates in Gram-positive pathogens isolated in the UK from October 1996 to January 1997 and October 1997 to January 1998

J. Andrewsa,*, J. Ashbya, G. Jevonsa, T. Marshallb, N. Linesc and R. Wisea

a Department of Medical Microbiology, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B18 7QH; b Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham B15 1BR; c Pathology Computing Department, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

Rates of resistance for two consecutive years for 28 centres (10 Teaching, nine Associate Teaching and nine District General hospitals) in the UK were compared. Combined rates of resistance for each of the hospital types of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin revealed an increase in the rate of resistance in Teaching hospitals (12.5% year 1, 23.5% year 2), but, for Associate Teaching and District General hospitals rates fell (Associate Teaching 19.1% year 1, 11.9% year 2; District General 16.5% year 1 and 11.3% year 2). Using conventional methodology to determine MICs, no strain was considered to have reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Among coagulase-negative staphylococci, increased resistance was observed for Staphylococcus epidermidis to rifampicin, for Staphylococcus haemolyticus to clindamycin, for Staphylococcus saprophyticus to penicillin and for Staphylococcus spp. to clindamycin, methicillin and rifampicin. For Streptococcus pneumoniae an upward trend in low-level resistance to penicillin was observed (18 of the 28 centres), however, for high-level resistance the trend was in the opposite direction (only four centres showed an increase). For Enterococcus faecalis there was a trend to a fall in levels of resistance, the only exception being an increase in high-level gentamicin resistance (10.5% year 1, 15.1% year 2, P = 0.0388). For Enterococcus faecium rates of resistance were not significantly different except for increases in resistance to nitrofurantoin and rifampicin.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-121-507-4228; Fax: +44-121-551-7763.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
W S Lim, S V Baudouin, R C George, A T Hill, C Jamieson, I Le Jeune, J T Macfarlane, R C Read, H J Roberts, M L Levy, et al.
BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009
Thorax, October 1, 2009; 64(Suppl_3): iii1 - iii55.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
W S Lim
Pandemic flu: clinical management of patients with an influenza-like illness during an influenza pandemic
Thorax, January 1, 2007; 62(suppl_1): 1 - 46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
V. I. Enne, A. A. Delsol, J. M. Roe, and P. M. Bennett
Rifampicin resistance and its fitness cost in Enterococcus faecium
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 203 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. A. Arias, J. Reyes, M. Zuniga, L. Cortes, C. Cruz, C. L. Rico, D. Panesso, and on behalf of the Colombian Antimicrobial Resistanc
Multicentre surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci and staphylococci from Colombian hospitals, 2001-2002
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2003; 51(1): 59 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
Y. Tveten, A. Jenkins, and B.-E. Kristiansen
A fusidic acid-resistant clone of Staphylococcus aureus associated with impetigo bullosa is spreading in Norway
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2002; 50(6): 873 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. M Brown, R. Wise, O. Sule, N. Brown, D. F J Brown, N. Burrows, V. C Weston, T. C J Boswell, R. G Finch, W. Perkins, et al.
Fusidic acid cream for impetigo
BMJ, June 8, 2002; 324(7350): 1394 - 1394.
[Full Text]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Thorax, December 1, 2001; 56(90004): iv1 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. J. Henwood, D. M. Livermore, A. P. Johnson, D. James, M. Warner, A. Gardiner, and The Linezolid Study Group
Susceptibility of Gram-positive cocci from 25 UK hospitals to antimicrobial agents including linezolid
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2000; 46(6): 931 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.