Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Entenza, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moreillon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Entenza, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moreillon, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 44, 775-786
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci

José M. Entenza, Isabelle Caldelari, Michel P. Glauser and Philippe Moreillon*

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

Levofloxacin was investigated against viridans group streptococci in vitro and in rats with experimental aortic endocarditis. The MIC90s of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for 20 independent isolates of such bacteria were 1 and 8 mg/L, respectively. Rats were infected with two types of organism: either fully susceptible to levofloxacin MIC <= 0.5 mg/L) or borderline susceptible (MIC 1–2 mg/L). Fully levofloxacin-susceptible bacteria comprised one penicillin-susceptible (MIC 0.004 mg/L) Streptococcus gordonii, and one penicillin-tolerant as well as one intermediate penicillin-resistant (MIC 0.125 mg/L) isogenic strains. Borderline levofloxacin-susceptible bacteria comprised one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus sanguis and one highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus mitis (MIC 2 mg/L). Rats were treated for 5 days with drug dosages simulating the following treatments in humans: (i) levofloxacin 500 mg orally once a day (q24 h), (ii) levofloxacin 500 mg orally twice a day (q12 h), (iii) levofloxacin 1 g orally q24 h, (iv) ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally q12 h, and (v) ceftriaxone 2 g iv q24 h. Levofloxacin was equivalent or superior to ceftriaxone, and was successful in treating experimental endocarditis irrespective of penicillin resistance. Nevertheless, standard levofloxacin treatment equivalent to 500 mg q24 h in human was less effective than twice daily 500 mg or once daily 1 g doses against borderline-susceptible organisms. Ciprofloxacin, used as a negative control, was ineffective and selected for resistant isolates. This underlines the importance of MIC determinations when treating severe streptococcal infection with quinolones. In the case of borderline-susceptible pathogens, total daily doses of 1 g of levofloxacin should be considered.

* Corresponding author. Tel. +41-21-314-10-26; Fax: +41-21-314-10-36 E-mail: pmoreill{at}chuv.hospvd.ch


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Aellen, Y.-A. Que, B. Guignard, M. Haenni, and P. Moreillon
Detection of Live and Antibiotic-Killed Bacteria by Quantitative Real-Time PCR of Specific Fragments of rRNA.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2006; 50(6): 1913 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Anguita-Alonso, M. S. Rouse, K. E. Piper, J. M. Steckelberg, and R. Patel
Garenoxacin treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1263 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Vouillamoz, J. M. Entenza, P. Hohl, and P. Moreillon
LB11058, a New Cephalosporin with High Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a Affinity and Activity in Experimental Endocarditis Due to Homogeneously Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2004; 48(11): 4322 - 4327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. M. Entenza, J. Vouillamoz, M. P. Glauser, and P. Moreillon
Efficacy of Garenoxacin in Treatment of Experimental Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus or Viridans Group Streptococci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2004; 48(1): 86 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Croisier, P. Chavanet, C. Lequeu, A. Ahanou, A. Nierlich, C. Neuwirth, L. Piroth, M. Duong, M. Buisson, and H. Portier
Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of simulated human-like treatment with levofloxacin on experimental pneumonia induced with penicillin-resistant pneumococci with various susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2002; 50(3): 349 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. M. Entenza, Y. A. Que, J. Vouillamoz, M. P. Glauser, and P. Moreillon
Efficacies of Moxifloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Vancomycin against Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Expressing Various Degrees of Ciprofloxacin Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2001; 45(11): 3076 - 3083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. Caldelari, B. Loeliger, H. Langen, M. P. Glauser, and P. Moreillon
Deregulation of the Arginine Deiminase (arc) Operon in Penicillin-Tolerant Mutants of Streptococcus gordonii
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2000; 44(10): 2802 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.