Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kreter, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kreter, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 44, 263-273
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections: two randomized, multicentre studies of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin

Ronald L. Nicholsa,*, Donald R. Grahamb, Steven L. Barrierec, Anthony Rodgersc, Samuel E. Wilsond, Marcus Zervose, David L. Dunnf, Bruce Kreterc and for the Synercid Skin Structure Infection Group

a Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA b Springfield Clinic, Springfield, IL c Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA d University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA e William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI f University of Minnesota Health Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), the first injectable streptogramin antibiotic available for the treatment of complicated Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, was compared with standard comparators (cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin) in one USA and one international trial. These two randomized, open-label trials of virtually identical design enrolled a total of 893 patients (450 quinupristin/dalfopristin, 443 comparator). The majority of patients had erysipelas, traumatic wound infection or clean surgical wound infection. Staphylococcus aureuswas the most frequently isolated pathogen in both treatment groups and polymicrobial infection was more common in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group than in the comparator group. The clinical success rate (cure plus improvement) in the clinically evaluable population was equivalent between the two treatment groups (68.2% quinupristin/dalfopristin, 70.7% comparator; 95% CI, -10.1, 5.1) despite a shorter mean duration of treatment for quinupristin/ dalfopristin patients. In the bacteriologically evaluable population, by-patient and by-pathogen bacteriological eradication rates were somewhat lower for quinupristin/dalfopristin (65.8% and 66.6%, respectively) than for the comparator regimens (72.7% and 77.7%, respectively). The lower bacteriological response rates in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group were, in part, due to a higher rate of polymicrobial infections and a higher incidence of patients classified as clinical failure, a category which included premature discontinuation of treatment because of local venous adverse events. The bacteriological eradication rate for quinupristin/dalfopristin was higher in monomicrobial infections than in polymicrobial infections (72.6% versus 63.3%, respectively), whereas the corresponding rate for the comparator regimens was lower for monomicrobial infections than polymicrobial infections (70.8% versus 83.1%). This finding was not unexpected, since the spectrum of quinupristin/dalfopristin is focused on Gram-positive pathogens and additional antibiotics to treat Gram-negative bacteria were not required per protocol. The systemic tolerability of both treatment regimens was qualitatively similar. A higher rate of drug-related venous adverse events was reported for quinupristin/dalfopristin (66.2%) than for the comparator regimen (28.4%). Premature discontinuation of study drug was primarily due to adverse clinical events for quinupristin/dalfopristin (19.1%), whereas the most common reason for discontinuation among those receiving the comparator regimens was treatment failure (11.5%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin is an effective alternative for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to quinupristin/ dalfopristin-susceptible Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant S. aureus.

* Correspondence address. Department of Surgery SL22-27, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699, USA. Tel: +1-504-588-5168; Fax: +1-504-586-3843.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. Bailey and K. M. Summers
Dalbavancin: A new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 1, 2008; 65(7): 599 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. J. Noel, R. S. Strauss, K. Amsler, M. Heep, R. Pypstra, and J. S. Solomkin
Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Ceftobiprole Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2008; 52(1): 37 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
T. J. Kowalski, E. F. Berbari, and D. R. Osmon
Epidemiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections
Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2005; 80(9): 1201 - 1208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
I. Phillips, M. Casewell, T. Cox, B. De Groot, C. Friis, R. Jones, C. Nightingale, R. Preston, and J. Waddell
Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2004; 53(1): 28 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
{blacktriangledown}Quinupristin + dalfopristin for infections
DTB, February 1, 2002; 40(2): 15 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. Gander, K. Hayward, and R. Finch
An investigation of the antimicrobial effects of linezolid on bacterial biofilms utilizing an in vitro pharmacokinetic model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2002; 49(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. J. Rehm, D. R. Graham, L. Srinath, P. Prokocimer, M.-P. Richard, and G. H. Talbot
Successful administration of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the outpatient setting
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 639 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Rachid, K. Ohlsen, W. Witte, J. Hacker, and W. Ziebuhr
Effect of Subinhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations on Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin Expression in Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus epidermidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2000; 44(12): 3357 - 3363.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. H. Drew, J. R. Perfect, L. Srinath, E. Kurkimilis, M. Dowzicky, G. H. Talbot, and for the Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group
Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with quinupristin-dalfopristin in patients intolerant of or failing prior therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2000; 46(5): 775 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
C. von Eiff, R. R. Reinert, M. Kresken, J. Brauers, and D. Hafner
Nationwide German Multicenter Study on Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcal Bloodstream Isolates and Comparative In Vitro Activities of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2000; 38(8): 2819 - 2823.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.