Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 314-315
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Correspondence

Sensitivity testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin: comparison of the modified Stokes' method with MIC results obtained by the Etest

J Antimicrob Chemother1999; 43: 314–315

A. Gallowaya,*, J. Wrightb, O. Murphya and G. Dickinsonb

a Public Health Laboratory, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE; b Department of Microbiology, Hexham General Hospital, Hexham, Northumberland NE46 1QJ, UK

Sir,

Gosden et al. reported on the comparison of the modified Stokes' method with the results of MIC testing by an agar incorporation method. 1 We would like to report our experience of a similar comparison with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, comparing the modified Stokes' method with the MIC result obtained by the Etest. Evaluation of the Etest for antimicrobial sensitivity testing of P. aeruginosa isolates to ciprofloxacin has been . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?