Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Viviani, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Viviani, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 295-299
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Brief reports

In-vitro activity of five antifungal agents against uncommon clinical isolates of Candida spp.

Francesco Barchiesia,*, Anna Maria Tortoranob, Luigi Falconi Di Francescoa, Massimo Cogliatib, Giorgio Scalisea and Maria Anna Vivianib

a Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Ancona; b Istituto di Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, Italy

A broth microdilution method and an agar dilution method were used for testing fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, flucytosine and amphotericin B against 98 clinical isolates belonging to seven species of Candida. The approximate rank order of fluconazole MICs was Candida lusitaniae {approx} Candida kefyr< Candida famata{approx}Candida guilliermondii< Candida pelliculosa {approx} C. lipolytica {approx} Candida inconspicua. Candida lypoliticaand C. pelliculosa were the species least susceptible to itraconazole and ketoconazole. Flucytosine MICs revealed the highest prevalence of resistant strains among C. lipolyticaand C. lusitaniae. All isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B.

* Correspondence address. Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Ancona, Ospedale Umberto I, Largo Cappelli 1, 60121 Ancona, Italy. Tel: +39-71-5963467; Fax: +39-71-5963468; E-mail: cmalinf{at}popcsi.unian.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, L. B. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S. Tendolkar, and M. A. Pfaller
In Vitro Activity of Seven Systemically Active Antifungal Agents against a Large Global Collection of Rare Candida Species as Determined by CLSI Broth Microdilution Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2009; 47(10): 3170 - 3177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
V. L. R. da Matta, M. d. S. C. Melhem, A. L. Colombo, M. L. Moretti, L. Rodero, G. M. D. de Almeida, M. d. A. Martins, S. F. Costa, M. B. G. Souza Dias, M. Nucci, et al.
Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Profile of Pichia anomala Isolates from Patients Presenting with Nosocomial Fungemia
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1573 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
F Barchiesi, A M Tortorano, L F. Di Francesco, A Rigoni, A Giacometti, E Spreghini, G Scalise, and M A Viviani
Genotypic variation and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida pelliculosa clinical isolates
J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2005; 54(3): 279 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. Majoros, G. Kardos, B. Szabo, M. Kovacs, and A. Maraz
Fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida inconspicua clinical isolates: comparison of four methods
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2005; 55(2): 275 - 276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Y. Kamai, M. Kakuta, T. Shibayama, T. Fukuoka, and S. Kuwahara
Antifungal Activities of R-135853, a Sordarin Derivative, in Experimental Candidiasis in Mice
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2005; 49(1): 52 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Favel, A. Michel-Nguyen, A. Datry, S. Challier, F. Leclerc, C. Chastin, K. Fallague, and P. Regli
Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida lusitaniae to five systemic antifungal agents
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2004; 53(3): 526 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, and R. N. Jones
In Vitro Activities of Voriconazole, Posaconazole, and Four Licensed Systemic Antifungal Agents against Candida Species Infrequently Isolated from Blood
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Y. Kamai, T. Harasaki, T. Fukuoka, S. Ohya, K. Uchida, H. Yamaguchi, and S. Kuwahara
In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of CS-758 (R-120758), a New Triazole Antifungal Agent
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2002; 46(2): 367 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
F. Barchiesi, D. Calabrese, D. Sanglard, L. Falconi Di Francesco, F. Caselli, D. Giannini, A. Giacometti, S. Gavaudan, and G. Scalise
Experimental Induction of Fluconazole Resistance in Candida tropicalis ATCC 750
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2000; 44(6): 1578 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
F. Barchiesi, D. Arzeni, A. W. Fothergill, L. F. Di Francesco, F. Caselli, M. G. Rinaldi, and G. Scalise
In Vitro Activities of the New Antifungal Triazole SCH 56592 against Common and Emerging Yeast Pathogens
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2000; 44(1): 226 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.