Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 42, 189-197, Copyright © 1998 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
J May, K Shannon, A King and G French
Treatment failures with vancomycin prompted us to investigate the
phenomenon of tolerance to glycopeptides in recent clinical isolates of
Staphylococcus aureus. We used both MBC/MIC determinations and time- kill
measurements to study tolerance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in 35 blood
or heart valve isolates of S. aureus from patients with endocarditis or
bacteraemia. There was generally good agreement between vancomycin
tolerance indicated by an MBC:MIC ratio of > or =32 and by < or =90%
kill after 6 h incubation in the presence of 20 mg/L vancomycin. However,
two isolates were tolerant according to their MBC:MIC ratios but
non-tolerant as judged by time-kill measurements. Seven of 15
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates but only two of 20
methicillin-susceptible ones were tolerant as judged by time- kill
experiments (chi2 = 4.27 with Yates' correction, P = 0.04). Seven of the 16
isolates from patients with endocarditis were tolerant, compared with only
two of the 19 isolates from patients with other conditions (chi2 = 3.43
with Yates' correction, P = 0.06). Within the endocarditis and
non-endocarditis subgroups, tolerance was associated more frequently with
methicillin resistance than with susceptibility, but the numbers were too
small for the differences to be statistically significant. Most of the
vancomycin-tolerant isolates were also tolerant to teicoplanin. We conclude
that glycopeptide tolerance is a real phenomenon in S. aureus, particularly
amongst MRSA isolates, and can be reliably determined by our method of
time-kill analysis. Tolerance may compromise glycopeptide therapy of
serious S. aureus infection and should be taken into account when deciding
treatment.
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Glycopeptide tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus
Department of Microbiology, UMDS, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Traczewski, B. D. Katz, J. N. Steenbergen, and S. D. Brown Inhibitory and Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Vancomycin, and Teicoplanin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from 1985 to 2007 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2009; 53(5): 1735 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Frank, J. L. del Pozo, and R. Patel From Clinical Microbiology to Infection Pathogenesis: How Daring To Be Different Works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 111 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Frank, E. J. Reichert, K. E. Piper, and R. Patel In Vitro Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Clinical Isolates Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 888 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bourgeois, M. Pestel-Caron, J.-F. Lemeland, J.-L. Pons, and F. Caron Tolerance to the Glycopeptides Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2007; 51(2): 740 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. French Bactericidal agents in the treatment of MRSA infections--the potential role of daptomycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2006; 58(6): 1107 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Sader, T. R. Fritsche, and R. N. Jones Daptomycin Bactericidal Activity and Correlation between Disk and Broth Microdilution Method Results in Testing of Staphylococcus aureus Strains with Decreased Susceptibility to Vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2006; 50(7): 2330 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gander, A. Kinnaird, and R. Finch Telavancin: in vitro activity against staphylococci in a biofilm model J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2005; 56(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Asseray, C. Jacqueline, V. Le Mabecque, E. Batard, D. Bugnon, G. Potel, and J. Caillon Activity of Glycopeptides against Staphylococcus aureus Infection in a Rabbit Endocarditis Model: MICs Do Not Predict In Vivo Efficacy Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2005; 49(2): 857 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sakoulas, P. A. Moise-Broder, J. Schentag, A. Forrest, R. C. Moellering Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos Relationship of MIC and Bactericidal Activity to Efficacy of Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2004; 42(6): 2398 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cha and M. J. Rybak Linezolid and Vancomycin, Alone and in Combination with Rifampin, Compared with Moxifloxacin against a Multidrug-Resistant and a Vancomycin-Tolerant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strain in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2003; 47(6): 1984 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gander, K. Hayward, and R. Finch An investigation of the antimicrobial effects of linezolid on bacterial biofilms utilizing an in vitro pharmacokinetic model J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2002; 49(2): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kozawa, T. Uematsu, H. Matsuno, M. Niwa, K.-I. Kohno, A. Kawato, K. Takahashi, S. Nagashima, and M. Kanamaru Pharmacokinetics of a New Parenteral Oligosaccharide Antibiotic, SCH27899 (Ziracin), in Healthy Subjects Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2001; 45(3): 917 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vaudaux, P. Francois, B. Berger-Bachi, and D. P. Lew In vivo emergence of subpopulations expressing teicoplanin or vancomycin resistance phenotypes in a glycopeptide-susceptible, methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2001; 47(2): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. May, C. H. Chan, A. King, L. Williams, and G. L. French Time-kill studies of tea tree oils on clinical isolates J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2000; 45(5): 639 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



