Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nissinen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nissinen, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 41, 19-26, Copyright © 1998 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

REVIEWS

Reliability of disc diffusion susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae and adjustment of laboratory-specific breakpoints. Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance

R Manninen, M Leinonen, P Huovinen and A Nissinen
Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Turku, Finland. raija.manninen@utu.fi

A routine disc diffusion method for detecting antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae was evaluated in 20 clinical microbiology laboratories. Fifty consecutive clinical isolates were tested by disc diffusion in each laboratory, and collected for MIC determinations. Participating laboratories used three disc types and several media; altogether 17 disc-medium-breakpoint reference combinations were used. Of the 781 isolates, 1.2% were resistant to penicillin and 4.2% were intermediately resistant. Eight of the nine resistant isolates had been classified as resistant to penicillin using a 1 microgram oxacillin disc screening test in the participating laboratories. If the MIC was taken as 0.125 mg/L, which is just above the intermediate breakpoint, 11 of 12 isolates were interpreted as susceptible to penicillin with the oxacillin disc test. The laboratories using Oxoid or Biodisk paper discs performed better in detecting co-trimoxazole resistance than the laboratories using Rosco tablets. Two control strains (one multiresistant and one susceptible) were each tested in the laboratories ten times. Based on these results laboratory-specific breakpoints for tetracycline were determined linearly. These adjusted breakpoints corrected three of five false-susceptible interpretations of the resistant clinical isolates and reduced the number of minor errors from 8.5% to 2.6%.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.