Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuursted, K.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuursted, K.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 221-226, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Evaluation of bactericidal activity and lag of regrowth (postantibiotic effect) of five antiseptics on nine bacterial pathogens

K Fuursted, A Hjort and L Knudsen
Department of Research and Development in Microbiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen S, Denmark.

Lag of regrowth or postantibiotic effect (PAE) relates to suppression of bacterial regrowth following short exposure to an antimicrobial agent. A delay in regrowth has not yet been studied for antiseptics to any great extent. We therefore examined and compared the lag of regrowth and the bactericidal activity of five antiseptics (chloramine T, chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, phenoxyethanol and mandelic-lactic acid) against nine bacterial pathogens. Delay in regrowth was determined by application of two concentration-time schedules: a test concentration at the MBC with a contact time of 1 h or using fixed suboptimum concentration of each antiseptic for 2 min (optimum concentrations sterilized the culture, impeding assessment of regrowth) followed by a neutralization-dilution step and subsequent viable counting to follow bacterial regrowth. Each antiseptic displayed a different spectrum of activity in terms of MIC or MBC, bactericidal effect and lag of regrowth. The delay in regrowth varied from 0 to 5.7 h with only a few discrepancies between the two treatment schedules. Mandelic-lactic acid and chloramine T induced a significantly longer lag as compared with the other agents, whereas phenoxyethanol produced the shortest lag values. No significant correlation between the killing rate and the lag of regrowth could be demonstrated. Information on bactericidal activity, as well as lag of regrowth, could be a useful screening method for the efficacy of antiseptics. Moreover, data on lag of regrowth could contribute to the choice of antiseptic and guide in determining the optimum interval between repeated applications of antiseptics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. Gottardi and M. Nagl
Chlorine covers on living bacteria: the initial step in antimicrobial action of active chlorine compounds
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2005; 55(4): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Nagl, A. Gruber, A. Fuchs, C. P. Lell, E.-M. Lemberger, M. Borg-von Zepelin, and R. Wurzner
Impact of N-Chlorotaurine on Viability and Production of Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases of Candida spp.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2002; 46(6): 1996 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Nagl, P. Hengster, E. Semenitz, and W. Gottardi
The postantibiotic effect of N-chlorotaurine on Staphylococcus aureus. Application in the mouse peritonitis model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 805 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.