Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Climo, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Archer, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Climo, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Archer, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 59-66, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparison of the in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy of FK037, vancomycin, imipenem and nafcillin against staphylococcal species

MW Climo, SM Markowitz, DS Williams, CG Hale-Cooper and GL Archer
Department of Medicine, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA.

The activity of methicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, imipenem and FK037 against 106 isolates of staphylococci was assessed using a microbroth dilution method with low (10(5) cfu/mL) and high (10(7) cfu/mL) inoculum sizes. Overall, FK037, an oxime-type cephem antibiotic, was as active as imipenem, but less active than vancomycin (MIC90s 25, 25 and 6.25 mg/L, respectively) at the lower inoculum. Efficiency of plating experiments were also performed to characterize phenotypic expression of resistance to FK037, imipenem and methicillin. Five of 24 isolates and 18 of 24 isolates contained subpopulations resistant to FK037 and imipenem, respectively. In a rabbit model of endocarditis, FK037 was equally effective as other antibiotics tested in the treatment of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection. In the treatment of endocarditis due to a homotypic methicillin-resistant S. aureus, FK037 and vancomycin were the most active antibiotics. The presence of subpopulations resistant to imipenem and FK037, as demonstrated by efficiency of plating and high inoculum MIC testing, did not correlate with antibiotic effectiveness in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Cultures of vegetation material following treatment with imipenem and FK037 demonstrated a lower frequency of organisms resistant to FK037 when compared with imipenem. Thus FK037 shows in-vitro and in-vivo activity against some methicillin-resistant staphylococcal species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. Kiri, G. Archer, and M. W. Climo
Combinations of Lysostaphin with {beta}-Lactams Are Synergistic against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2002; 46(6): 2017 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. E. Finan, G. L. Archer, M. J. Pucci, and M. W. Climo
Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 4 in Expression of Vancomycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2001; 45(11): 3070 - 3075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. M. File Jr, B. Schlemmer, J. Garau, M. Cupo, C. Young, and the 049 Clinical Study Group
Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2001; 48(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. W. Climo, K. Ehlert, and G. L. Archer
Mechanism and Suppression of Lysostaphin Resistance in Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2001; 45(5): 1431 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Jonas, I. Engels, C. Friedhoff, B. Spitzmuller, F. D. Daschner, and U. Frank
Efficacy of moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin and levofloxacin against intracellular Legionella pneumophila
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2001; 47(2): 147 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. W. Climo, R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer
Combinations of Vancomycin and beta -Lactams Are Synergistic against Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibilities to Vancomycin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 1999; 43(7): 1747 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. L. Patron, M. W. Climo, B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer
Lysostaphin Treatment of Experimental Aortic Valve Endocarditis Caused by a Staphylococcus aureus Isolate with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 1999; 43(7): 1754 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Georgopoulos, A. Buxbaum, and W. Graninger
Efficacy of {beta}-lactam and inhibitor combinations in a diffusion chamber model in rabbits
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 1999; 43(4): 497 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. W. Climo, R. L. Patron, B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer
Lysostaphin Treatment of Experimental Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Aortic Valve Endocarditis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 1998; 42(6): 1355 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.