Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 817-820, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors affecting development of rifampicin resistance in biofilm- producing Staphylococcus epidermidis

E Svensson, H Hanberger, M Nilsson and LE Nilsson
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden.

Selection and regrowth of variants resistant to 0.016-32 mg/L of rifampicin, which were present at a frequency of 10(-7) in the initial inoculum, were seen when large inocula (> 10(5) cfu/mL) of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 were incubated with the drug. Conventional MIC determinations using approximately 10(5) cfu/mL did not detect the resistant variants. Larger inocula increased the MIC by > 8000-fold. Population analysis showed that rifampicin concentrations above the MIC (measured at an inoculum of approximately 10(5) cfu/mL) select highly resistant variants (MIC > 256 mg/L) when large inocula (> or = 10(5) cfu/mL) were incubated with rifampicin. The resistant variants were stable through ten passages. It was not possible to prevent regrowth of the resistant variants by increasing the rifampicin concentration further. At subinhibitory concentrations there was no development of rifampicin resistance.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. Bayston, B. Nuradeen, W. Ashraf, and B. J. C. Freeman
Antibiotics for the eradication of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms in surgical infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2007; 60(6): 1298 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. A. N. Broekhuizen, L. de Boer, K. Schipper, C. D. Jones, S. Quadir, R. G. Feldman, J. Dankert, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, J. J. Weening, and S. A. J. Zaat
Peri-Implant Tissue Is an Important Niche for Staphylococcus epidermidis in Experimental Biomaterial-Associated Infection in Mice
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2007; 75(3): 1129 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Gualtieri, L. Bastide, P. Villain-Guillot, S. Michaux-Charachon, J. Latouche, and J.-P. Leonetti
In vitro activity of a new antibacterial rhodanine derivative against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2006; 58(4): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. G. Gemmell, D. I. Edwards, A. P. Fraise, F. K. Gould, G. L. Ridgway, R. E. Warren, and on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis
Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 589 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Yucel, R. Lefering, M. Maegele, M. Max, R. Rossaint, A. Koch, R. Schwarz, M. Korenkov, J. Beuth, A. Bach, et al.
Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2004; 54(6): 1109 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. Bayston, W. Ashraf, and C. Bhundia
Mode of action of an antimicrobial biomaterial for use in hydrocephalus shunts
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2004; 53(5): 778 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Kadurugamuwa, L. V. Sin, J. Yu, K. P. Francis, R. Kimura, T. Purchio, and P. R. Contag
Rapid Direct Method for Monitoring Antibiotics in a Mouse Model of Bacterial Biofilm Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2003; 47(10): 3130 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Z. Zheng and P. S. Stewart
Penetration of Rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2002; 46(3): 900 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.