Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauernfeind, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauernfeind, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1993) 31, 505-522
© 1993 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


other

Comparative in-vitro activities of the new quinolone, Bay y 3118, and ciprofloxacin, sparfioxacin, tosufloxacin, CI-960 and CI-990

A. Bauernfeind

Max von Pettenkofer-Institut Pettenkoferstr. 9a, 8000 Munich 2, Germany

Received 29 September 1992; accepted 18 December 1992


The in-vitro activity of the new quinolone, Bay y 3118, was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfioxacin, CI-960 and CI-990 against 1640 isolates belonging to 117 bacterial species. Against members of the Enterobacteriaceae, Bay y 3118 was as active as CI-960 and CI-990, up to four-fold more active than ciprofloxacin and tosufloxacin and up to 16-fold more active than sparfioxacin. The majority of Enterobacteriaceae which were resistant to ciprofloxacin (MICs{succcurlyeq}2 mg/L) were sensitive to Bay y 3118. With the exception of ciprofloxacin which was less active, the activities of Bay y 3118 and the other comparator compounds were similar against Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter genospecies 3 and Acinetobacter strain 84. Bay y 3118 inhibited Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates at concentrations comparable with those of ciprofloxacin. However, non-aeruginosa Pseudomonas spp. were four times more susceptible to Bay y 3118 than to cipro floxacin. All of the agents tested were equally active against Haemophilus, Moraxella, Neisseria and Bordetella spp. Against staphylococci, Bay y 3118 was the most active compound, followed jointly by CI-990, sparfioxacin, CI-960 and tosufloxacin, and then ciprofloxacin. Bay y 3118 remained highly active against Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to ciprofloxacin; the MIC90 (0.5 mg/L) was 16-fold less than that of CI-990 and sparfioxacin, 32-fold less than that of CI-960 and 128-fold less than that of tosufloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Against haemolytic and non-haemolytic streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis, Bay y 3118 was two- to 16-fold more active than the other compounds. It had only moderate activity against Listeria spp., but this was superior to that of all the other compounds tested. Bay y 3118 was also the most active agent overall against anaerobic bacteria, although CI-960 and CI-990 had slightly better activity against Gardnerella vaginalis. It inhibited Mycobacterium spp. other than Mycobacterlum tuberculosis (Mycobac teriwn kansasil, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, Mycobacteriwn gordonae, Mycobacterium xenopi, Mycobacterium fiavescens, Mycobacteriwn avium and Mycobacterlum fortuitwn) at concentrations ≤0·06–4 mg/L and was between two- and 128-fold more active than the other compounds against these isolates; the two strains each of Mycobacterium terrae and Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum were resistant to Bay y 3118. In this study, Bay y 3118 was shown to be the most active and most broad-spectrum of the new quinolone and naphthyridine derivatives.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Peric, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum
Antianaerobic Activity of a Novel Fluoroquinolone, WCK 771, Compared to Those of Nine Other Agents
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2004; 48(8): 3188 - 3192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Liebetrau, A. C. Rodloff, J. Behra-Miellet, and L. Dubreuil
In Vitro Activities of a New Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone, Garenoxacin, against Clinical Anaerobic Bacteria
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2003; 47(11): 3667 - 3671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. B. Hoellman, L. M. Kelly, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum
Comparative Antianaerobic Activity of BMS 284756
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2001; 45(2): 589 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Ball
Quinolone generations: natural history or natural selection?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2000; 46(90003): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. L. Williams, N. B. Harris, and R. G. Barletta
Development of a Firefly Luciferase-Based Assay for Determining Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 1999; 37(2): 304 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. M. Ednie, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum
Activities of Gatifloxacin Compared to Those of Seven Other Agents against Anaerobic Organisms
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 1998; 42(9): 2459 - 2462.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
X. Zhao, J.-Y. Wang, C. Xu, Y. Dong, J. Zhou, J. Domagala, and K. Drlica
Killing of Staphylococcus aureus by C-8-Methoxy Fluoroquinolones
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 1998; 42(4): 956 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
M. Denton and K. G. Kerr
Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Infection Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 1998; 11(1): 57 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.