Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Klingeren, B.
Right arrow Articles by Verheuvel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Klingeren, B.
Right arrow Articles by Verheuvel, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1988) 21, 737-744
© 1988 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Surveillance of the antibiotic susceptibility of non-penicillinase producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Netherlands from 1983 to 1986

B. van Klingerena, M. C. Ansink-Schipperb, L. Doornbosc, A. D. Lamped, J. H. T. Wagenvoorte, M. Dessens-Kroona and M. Verheuvela

aNational Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven bMunicipal Health Service P.O. Box 20244, 1000 ME Amsterdam cWesteinde Hospital Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA The Hague dLeijenburg Hospital Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague eUniversity Hospital Rotterdam/Dijkzigt Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 26 November 1987; accepted 9 February 1988


From 1983 to 1986 more than 2000 non-pènicillinase producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae from Amsterdam, The Hague and Rotterdam were auxotyped and screened for susceptibility to 10 antibiotics by MIC determination. By far the commonest auxotypes were N.R. (non-requiring; 40%) and Pro (proline requiring; 30%). During that period there was a substantial shift in the ratio of both auxotypes-roughly from 1:2 to 2:1—in The Hague.

Pro isolates were generally less susceptible than N.R. isolates, and there was a strong positive correlation between the MICs of the different drugs. The prevalence of isolates with a penicillin MIC equal to or above 0·5 IU/ml amounted to 14%, while in only 1% was the MIC above 1 IU/ml. Comparing our results with an earlier study by Stolz, Zwarte & Michel (1975, British Journal of Venereal Diseases 51, 257–64), the level of resistance to penicillin among non-PPNG has not significantly increased in The Netherlands since 1972.

The prevalence of isolates showing relative resistance towards tetracycline and thiamphenicol (MIC 2–4 mg/l) decreased from approximately 20% in 1983/84 to approximately 10% in 1985/86, coinciding with a drop in the prevalence of Pro isolates. All strains were susceptible to cefuroxime and spectinomycin and highly susceptible to cefotaxime and riprofloxacin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Tanaka, H. Nakayama, M. Haraoka, T. Saika, I. Kobayashi, and S. Naito
Antimicrobial Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and High Prevalence of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Isolates in Japan, 1993 to 1998
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2000; 38(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. C. Roberts, W. O. Chung, D. Roe, M. Xia, C. Marquez, G. Borthagaray, W. L. Whittington, and K. K. Holmes
Erythromycin-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Oral Commensal Neisseria spp. Carry Known rRNA Methylase Genes
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 1367 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.