Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access first published online on August 5, 2008
This version published online on September 5, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn322
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/973    most recent
dkn322v3
dkn322v2
dkn322v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Echenique, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Echenique, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin increase the mutation rate to optochin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Paulo R. Cortes, Germán E. Piñas, Andrea G. Albarracin Orio and José R. Echenique*

Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, CIBICI (CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Medina Allende esq. Haya de la Torre, Ciudad Universitaria, X5000HUA Córdoba, Argentina


* Corresponding author. Tel: +54-351-4344973 ext. 112; Fax: +54-351-4333048; E-mail: jeche{at}fcq.unc.edu.ar

Received 8 April 2008; returned 23 June 2008; revised 4 July 2008; accepted 15 July 2008


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
Objectives: The aim of this work was to study the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin, chloramphenicol and erythromycin on the mutation rate of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Methods: The mutation rate to rifampicin and optochin resistance was estimated using fluctuation analysis in three capsulated S. pneumoniae strains, cultured both with and without different subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. The atpAC and rpoB mutations that conferred optochin and rifampicin resistance, respectively, were identified by DNA sequencing.

Results: The exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin increased the mutation rate (expressed as mutation per cell division) to optochin resistance between 2.1- and 3.1-fold for all three strains studied. In contrast, the rifampicin resistance assay showed no significant variations. To analyse the putative cause of the different responses between the optochin and rifampicin tests, mutations that conferred resistance in both cases were analysed. The difference may be explained by the genetic nature of the atpAC mutations, mostly transversions, which are not efficiently repaired by the HexAB mismatch repair system.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin significantly increased the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae, suggesting that exposure to this antibiotic could help this pathogen to acquire mutations that confer resistance to other antibiotics. The optochin test was useful to detect this phenomenon and it should be considered for further mutability analysis in S. pneumoniae.

Key Words: mismatch repair system , mutability , rifampicin


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
Streptococcus pneumoniae is not only a normal inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract of humans, but it is also the most common cause of invasive bacterial infections in children after the neonatal period, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since the 1980s, a worrying increase in pneumococci resistant to β-lactams and macrolides has been reported. Despite this alarming therapeutical situation, these antibiotics are still the first-line empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia.

After administration, antibiotics reach concentrations higher than those required for bacterial inhibition in the various host tissues. Nevertheless, the antibiotic concentration frequently decreases in some body compartments, both during treatment and after removal, thereby exposing the pathogens to subinhibitory antibiotic levels over long periods of time. It has been noted that exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics produces multiple effects on bacterial cells, such as a decrease in biofilm formation, secretion of virulence factors, flagellin expression, toxin secretion, as well as an increase in bacterial adhesion, gene transfer, colicin synthesis and, in particular, mutation frequency.1 The hypermutator phenotype described in several bacterial pathogens is due to permanent mutations in genes that encode the DNA repair systems, such as hexA and hexB genes in S. pneumoniae.2,3 Under stress conditions, hypermutator strains have the advantage of rapid adaptation. Antibiotic-induced mutability is a transient physiological state, which allows bacteria to generate mutations and to survive a specific stress situation.

In this work, our main objective was to investigate the effects of the subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin, erythromycin and chloramphenicol on the mutation frequency of S. pneumoniae, using the optochin and rifampicin resistance tests to evaluate this phenomenon.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
Bacterial strains

The following reference strains were used in this study: S. pneumoniae D39 NCTC 7466 (capsulated virulent strain, serotype 2), S. pneumoniae R6 ATCC BAA-255 (uncapsulated derivate from D39) and S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (capsulated strain, serotype 19F). We also used S. pneumoniae CBA7, a clinical serotype 14 strain.

Fluctuation analysis

The fluctuation analysis was performed as described previously.4 The antibiotic concentrations used corresponded to 75% of the MIC determined for each compound and strain analysed [Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)]. The mutation rate to rifampicin and optochin resistance was determined for at least 20 replicas by spreading the entire 0.4 mL of each culture on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates containing 2 mg/L rifampicin and 6 mg/L optochin, respectively. The mutation rate determinations and the statistical analysis from the fluctuation assays were carried out as described by Gould et al.,4 using the FT program created by the Sniegowski laboratory (available at http://www.bio.upenn.edu/faculty/sniegowski/#software).

Construction of the hexB mutant

PCR-ligation mutagenesis was used for the construction of the hexB insertion–deletion mutant. The hexB 5'-flanking region was amplified with primers FhexB1 (5'-TAAGCGGTTGCCAAAGTTGAAGAGC-3') and RhexB1 (5'-GCGAATTCAGGAAAAGCTGATTGTCCAAGCACC-3') and the 3'-flanking region was amplified with primers FhexB2 (5'-GCGAATTCTGTTCAAAAACCTTGATTTTATGCG-3') and RhexB2 (5'-AACAAAGAAAAATCGAATGGGTCAC-3'). Both DNA fragments were digested with EcoRI and ligated to the kanamycin resistance gene, aphA3, excised with the same restriction enzyme from the plasmid pGEM-{Omega}Km. This plasmid contains the aphA3 gene, which was amplified with primers FKmMeg (5'-CCGGGCCCAAAATTTGTTTGATTTTAGCTTCTGGTGTATAATTAAATACTGTAGAAAAGAGGAAGG-3') and RKmMeg (5'-GGACAGTTGCGGATGTACTTC-3'), cloned in pGEM-T easy®. The ligation mixture was used to transform strain D39, and the selection of mutants was made in BHI 5% sheep-blood agar plates supplemented with kanamycin at 250 mg/L. The presence of the desired mutation was confirmed by PCR.

Transformation assays

The R6 and D39 strains were genetically transformed using a procedure described previously.5 Cells were transformed with PCR-amplified atpAC or rpoB genes, and transformants were selected on Mueller–Hinton agar plates supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood, containing 6 mg/L optochin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) or 2 mg/L rifampicin (Sigma), respectively.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The nucleotide sequence data were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers: EU256624 [GenBank] -30 and EU256632 [GenBank] -36.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
Antibiotic effects on the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae

Based on previous reports describing antibiotics inducing a transient mutability increase in bacteria,1 we investigated whether this phenomenon could also occur in S. pneumoniae, by testing antibiotics that are frequently used for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, such as penicillin and erythromycin, and also chloramphenicol, which is a non-related antibiotic. Rifampicin resistance testing (or rifampicin test) is the most common assay used to assess the mutation frequency in bacteria, which has also been tested on S. pneumoniae.6

Here, we evaluated the antibiotic effects on the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae by using an additional test, an optochin resistance assay, where optochin resistance is conferred by point mutations in the atpAC genes that encode subunits of F0.F1-ATPase.7 Optochin is a quinine derivate with antimicrobial activity against S. pneumoniae, and the optochin disc test is used in clinical laboratories for its identification. Three capsulated strains (D39, ATCC 49619 and CBA7) were exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics, corresponding to 75% of each MIC value [Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)], and the mutation rate to optochin resistance was estimated. The results obtained (Figure 1 and Table S1) showed that erythromycin and chloramphenicol did not alter this mutation rate. However, when we compared the exposed and unexposed cells for penicillin, this antibiotic increased the average rate of the optochin-resistant mutants 2.6-fold for the D39 strain (3.4 x 10–8 versus 1.3 x 10–8 mutations per cell division), 3.1-fold for the ATCC 49619 strain (2.2 x 10–7 versus 7.2 x 10–8 mutations per cell division) and 2.1-fold for the CBA7 strain (2.9 x 10–8 versus 1.4 x 10–8 mutations per cell division). In parallel, the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae was also estimated by the rifampicin test, but the differences found between cells either with or without penicillin treatment were not significant (D39, 3.1 x 10–8 versus 3.2 x 10–8 mutations per cell division; ATCC 49619, 1.6 x 10–7 versus 1.9 x 10–8 mutations per cell division; and CBA7 strain, 1.0 x 10–8 versus 1.2 x 10–8 mutations per cell division), indicating a different sensitivity between both tests in determining the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Effect of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations on the mutation rate of three pneumococcal strains. The pneumococcal strains were grown in BHI alone or with the addition of antibiotics. The mutation rates corresponding to optochin and rifampicin resistance were calculated as described in the Materials and methods section. The corresponding values and the confidence limits are indicated in Table S1 [available as Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)]. Each distribution corresponds to the analysis of at least 20 replicates for each strain and condition analysed. PEN, penicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; ERY, erythromycin.

 
Analysis of the penicillin-induced mutation types that conferred optochin and rifampicin resistance

The differing results obtained between the optochin and rifampicin tests raised the question about the putative cause of this difference. Thus, we investigated the penicillin-generated mutation types in the atpAC (encodes subunits of the F0.F1 ATPase) and rpoB (encodes the β subunit of the RNA polymerase) genes that conferred optochin and rifampicin resistance, respectively. To characterize the penicillin-induced atpAC mutations, 20 OptR colonies were randomly picked from plates containing a total of 40–50 OptR colonies, which were plated from a pool of penicillin-induced OptR mutants generated in vitro from the D39 strain. The atpAC genes of these OptR mutants were amplified and transformed into the optochin-susceptible R6 strain. Then, those PCR products able to confer optochin resistance were sequenced, and we found the G14S, A49T, A49S, F45V and F50L atpC mutations, which have been reported7,8 (Table 1). A similar protocol was used to characterize the penicillin-induced rpoB mutations. We analysed only cluster I of the rpoB gene9 from 20 RifR colonies, and we found three mainly conserved substitutions in the rifampicin-resistant strains, S482F, H486Y and H486N, and two new mutations, Q473R and R500H (Table 1). The amino acid positions were assigned according to the GenBank accession no. NC_008533 [GenBank] , corresponding to the genome sequence of strain D39. Following the search for putative causes that could explain the differences found between the optochin and rifampicin tests, we then focused our attention on the kind of mutations, and we found 60% transversions and 40% transitions for the OptR mutations and 35% transversions and 65% transitions for the RifR mutations (Table 1 and Table S1). The incidence of transversions/transitions between both populations showed opposite trends, and we proposed that the genetic nature of the genes studied may explain the differences in mutation rates assessed by the optochin and rifampicin tests.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. rpoB and atpAC mutations identified in rifampicin- and optochin-resistant strains obtained from strain D39

 
Effect of the mismatch repair system (MRS) on the penicillin-induced mutation rate

It has been shown previously that the MRS of S. pneumoniae has a lower repair efficiency for transversions.10 Considering that the OptR mutations showed a predominance of transversions compared with the RifR mutations, we hypothesized that this fact could explain the increased mutability detected only by the optochin resistance assays. To analyse the putative effect of the MRS on the penicillin-induced mutator phenotype, we constructed the hexB mutant by insertion–deletion mutagenesis in the D39 strain. This mutant was exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin (75% MIC) and the mutation rate to optochin resistance was determined. The mutation rate was higher than the wild-type strain, increasing 11- and 26-fold by rifampicin and optochin resistance assays, respectively (Figure 1d). When the hexB mutant was exposed to penicillin, we detected no differences in the mutation rates to optochin and rifampicin resistance compared with the data obtained from the unexposed cells, suggesting that the lesser ability of the MRS to repair transversions could be how penicillin-induced mutator phenotypes are detected by the optochin resistance assays in wild-type strains (Figure 1a–c).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
In this work, we found that subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin increased the mutation rate to optochin resistance between 2.1- and 3.1-fold for the three strains studied. This rise was detected by the optochin resistance assay, but not by the classical rifampicin resistance assay. We estimated the mutation rate (as mutation per cell division) using fluctuation analysis because it is more accurate and reproducible than mutation frequencies (ratio of mutants/total cells in the population), which have a reduced level of reliability as demonstrated by Luria and Delbruck.11

The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of different antibiotics on the frequency of mutation in S. pneumoniae has been reported.12 The authors found that ciprofloxacin and streptomycin increased the mutation frequency to rifampicin resistance between 2- and 5-fold for three isolates, but neither erythromycin nor ampicillin had any effects on any isolate. These findings were consistent with our results, because when the rifampicin test was used to evaluate erythromycin and penicillin, we did not find any modification in the mutation rate to rifampicin resistance.

To explain the different mutation rates obtained by optochin and rifampicin resistance assays, we explored the possibility that the MRS was less efficient due to the genetic nature of the OptR mutations. Comparing the mutations that confer optochin and rifampicin resistance, we observed a predominance of transversions over transitions among the OptR mutations, which could explain the increased mutation rate. We propose that the predominance of transversions among the OptR mutations could explain the increase in mutation rate to optochin resistance due to repair inefficiency of the MRS. In this sense, the hexB mutant showed no differences in its mutation rate when cells were exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin, suggesting that the MRS is involved in this phenomenon.

Here, we demonstrated that the optochin test was more useful for the analysis of the mutability state of pneumococcus, and we propose that this test should also be considered in future studies of adaptive mutability for S. pneumoniae. Coincidently with this proposition, mutation rate to optochin resistance was recently used to identify mutator phenotypes of clinical strains of S. pneumoniae.4

Penicillin is an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of pneumococcal infections. Because antibiotic concentrations frequently diminish during the treatment or removal, we propose that the penicillin effect on the mutation rate of S. pneumoniae should have multiple consequences caused by mutations acquired during this transient mutator state. It is known that bacteria could transiently increase their mutation rate in response to stress conditions, thus generating a hypermutator subpopulation of cells containing multiple mutations.13 This subpopulation would be able to acquire specific phenotypes to allow survival and proliferation by increasing its mutation rate or its transformability. In this sense, Prudhomme et al.14 reported that S. pneumoniae stressed with aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone antibiotics induces transformation, favouring genetic exchange that could increase antibiotic-resistant clones.

Because the penicillin effect on the mutation rate is transitory, maintaining a low mutation rate is an advantage because mutation accumulation produces detrimental effects in bacteria.13 In this work, we have demonstrated that penicillin is able to induce a transient mutator state. We hypothesized that penicillin is a putative factor generating mutations that S. pneumoniae could exploit to enable survival in host tissues. Our results suggest that penicillin exposure could facilitate the appearance of mutations that confer resistance to other antibiotics.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCYT; grant PICT 05-10894 BID 1728 OC-AR), CONICET and SECYT-UNC.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
None to declare.


    Supplementary data
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
Table S1 is available as Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/).


    Footnotes
 
The original version of this paper was incorrect. There was an error in Table 1: column 4, final row should have read TNS not TNV.

The previous version was incorrect. On page 3, right-hand column, line 5, it shoud have read ‘35%’ and ‘65%’


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Jose L. Barra and Carlos Argaraña (Facultad Cs. Químicas-UNC) for their critical reviews of this article, Mariana Martina (Facultad Cs. Químicas-UNC) for their participation in the construction of the hexB mutant, Casilda Ruperez and Patricia Bertolotto (Facultad de Astronomía, Matemática y Física-UNC) for statistical support and native English speaker Dr Paul Hobson (Asoc. Argentina de Cultura Británica) for revising this manuscript. G. E. P. is a PhD fellow of CONICET and A. G. A. O. is a PhD fellow of ANPCYT. J. R. E. is a member of the Research Career of CONICET.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 Supplementary data
 References
 
1 . Davies J, Spiegelman GB, Yim G. The world of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Curr Opin Microbiol (2006) 9:445–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 . Prudhomme M, Mejean V, Martin B, et al. Mismatch repair genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae: HexA confers a mutator phenotype in Escherichia coli by negative complementation. J Bacteriol (1991) 173:7196–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 . Prats H, Martin B, Claverys JP. The hexB mismatch repair gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterisation, cloning and identification of the product. Mol Gen Genet (1985) 200:482–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

4 . Gould CV, Sniegowski PD, Shchepetov M, et al. Identifying mutator phenotypes among fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae using fluctuation analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:3225–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 . de la Campa AG, Garcia E, Fenoll A, et al. Molecular bases of three characteristic phenotypes of pneumococcus: optochin-sensitivity, coumarin-sensitivity, and quinolone-resistance. Microb Drug Resist (1997) 3:177–93.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 . Morosini MI, Baquero MR, Sanchez-Romero JM, et al. Frequency of mutation to rifampin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains: hexA and hexB polymorphisms do not account for hypermutation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2003) 47:1464–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 . Fenoll A, Munoz R, Garcia E, et al. Molecular basis of the optochin-sensitive phenotype of pneumococcus: characterization of the genes encoding the F0 complex of the Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus oralis H(+)-ATPases. Mol Microbiol (1994) 12:587–98.[Web of Science][Medline]

8 . Cortes PR, Albarracín Orio AG, Regueira M, et al. Characterization of in vitro-generated and clinical optochin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from Argentina. J Clin Microbiol (2008) 46:1930–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 . Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, et al. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell (2001) 104:901–12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 . Gasc AM, Sicard AM, Claverys JP. Repair of single- and multiple-substitution mismatches during recombination in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Genetics (1989) 121:29–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 . Luria SE, Delbruck M. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics (1943) 28:491–511.[Free Full Text]

12 . Henderson-Begg SK, Livermore DM, Hall LM. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on mutation frequency in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother (2006) 57:849–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 . Foster PL. Stress responses and genetic variation in bacteria. Mutat Res (2005) 569:3–11.[Web of Science][Medline]

14 . Prudhomme M, Attaiech L, Sanchez G, et al. Antibiotic stress induces genetic transformability in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science (2006) 313:89–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/973    most recent
dkn322v3
dkn322v2
dkn322v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Echenique, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Echenique, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?