Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on August 9, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn320
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/1053    most recent
dkn320v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Woodford, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Woodford, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

NXL104 combinations versus Enterobacteriaceae with CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases

David M. Livermore1,*, Shazad Mushtaq1, Marina Warner1, Christine Miossec2 and Neil Woodford1

1 Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, UK 2 Novexel SA, Romainville, France


* Correspondence address. Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring and Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK. Tel: +44-20-8327-7223; Fax: +44-20-8327-6264; E-mail: david.livermore{at}hpa.org.uk

Received 29 April 2008; returned 12 June 2008; revised 7 July 2008; accepted 14 July 2008


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Background: The β-lactamase landscape is changing radically, with CTX-M types now the most prevalent extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) worldwide, except maybe in the USA. In addition, there are growing numbers of Enterobacteriaceae with KPC and metallo-carbapenemases. We examined whether combinations of oxyimino-cephalosporins with NXL104, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, overcame these resistances.

Methods: NXL104 was tested at 4 mg/L in combination with cefotaxime and ceftazidime versus: (i) Escherichia coli transconjugants and wild-type Enterobacteriaceae with CTX-M ESBLs; (ii) Enterobacteriaceae with ertapenem resistance contingent on combinations of impermeability and ESBLs or AmpC; and (iii) Enterobacteriaceae with KPC, SME, metallo- or OXA-48 carbapenemases.

Results: MICs of cefotaxime + NXL104 were ≤1 mg/L for most Enterobacteriaceae with CTX-M, KPC or OXA-48 enzymes and were ≤2 mg/L for those that also had ertapenem resistance contingent on combinations of β-lactamase and impermeability. MICs of the ceftazidime + NXL104 combination were ≤4 mg/L, except for a single Enterobacter aerogenes with KPC and AmpC enzymes together with porin loss, which required an MIC of 32 mg/L. The major gap was that NXL104 could not potentiate cephalosporins against Enterobacteriaceae with IMP or VIM metallo-enzymes.

Conclusions: Oxyimino-cephalosporin + NXL104 combinations have potential against strains with the prevalent ESBLs and non-metallo-carbapenemases.

Key Words: β-lactamase inhibitors , ESBLs , KPC carbapenemase , metallo-β-lactamases


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
NXL104 (Novexel) is a novel-structure β-lactamase inhibitor (Figure 1). It was shown previously to inhibit AmpC and TEM/SHV-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), potentiating cephalosporins against producers.1


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Structure of NXL104.

 
However, the β-lactamase landscape is now changing radically. CTX-M enzymes, rather than TEM and SHV mutants, are increasingly the predominant ESBLs in Europe and Asia,2,3 with this replacement perhaps now beginning also in North America.4 Other ESBLs are locally frequent, for example, PER enzymes in Turkey and Argentina5,6 and VEB types in the East Asia. In addition, there is a slow emergence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Some of this is due to porin loss—often unstable—in ESBL- and AmpC-producing strains,7 more worryingly, though, true carbapenemases are also gradually accumulating. Specifically, (i) Klebsiella pneumoniae clones with KPC carbapenemases are spreading across the USA, Colombia and Israel8,9 with scattered reports from Europe and China; (ii) there are clusters of Enterobacteriaceae isolates with metallo-carbapenemases in southern Europe and Asia; and (iii) there are multiple reports of Enterobacteriaceae with OXA-48, a weak carbapenemase in Turkey.

We assessed the activity of NXL104 combined with cefotaxime and ceftazidime against these increasingly important resistance types.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The organisms tested comprised: (i) Escherichia coli transconjugants with CTX-M enzymes or carbapenemases (n = 5); (ii) carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates with CTX-M enzymes, mostly CTX-M-15, collected in a recent UK survey (n = 57); (iii) Klebsiella spp. isolates substantially resistant to ertapenem (MICs ≥4 mg/L) owing to combinations of ESBLs with impermeability and Enterobacter spp. resistant to ertapenem owing to combinations of ESBL or AmpC and impermeability (n = 17); and (iv) Enterobacteriaceae isolates with KPC, SME, IMP, VIM and OXA-48 carbapenemases, collected worldwide (n = 23).

MICs of cefotaxime and ceftazidime (both Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) were mostly determined in combination with 4 mg/L NXL104 by the CLSI (formerly the NCCLS) method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK).10 Anomalous results were re-checked with cefotaxime and ceftazidime Etests® (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) on Mueller–Hinton agar with or without 4 mg/L NXL104; this method was also used for all tests with metallo-β-lactamase producers, undertaken subsequently to the main batch of organisms. The agar dilution and Etest methods gave identical results, ±one doubling dilution, when applied to the same isolate.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
MICs for Enterobacteriaceae transconjugants with the three most prevalent CTX-M ESBLs in Europe (i.e. CTX-M-9, 14 and -15, also PER-1) are shown in Table 1, whereas those for carbapenem-susceptible clinical isolates with various CTX-M enzymes are shown in Table 2, sorted by the enzyme group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. MICs (mg/L) for E. coli transconjugants with CTX-M and PER enzymes

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. MIC distributions of cefotaxime and ceftazidime and their combinations with NXL104 for clinical isolates

 
The potentiation of cefotaxime by NXL104 generally exceeded 1000-fold for isolates with CTX-M enzymes, with MICs reduced from ≥128 to 0.03 to 0.12 mg/L. MICs of ceftazidime for isolates with CTX-M-15 enzyme were reduced from (generally) ≥64 to 0.25–1 mg/L; those for isolates with other CTX-M types, which generally confer lower levels of ceftazidime resistance than CTX-M-15, were reduced from 2–8 to 0.12–1 mg/L.

When tested against ertapenem-resistant (MIC >2 mg/L) Enterobacteriaceae isolates that had combinations of CTX-M or AmpC enzymes together with impermeability, NXL104 reduced cefotaxime MICs to ≤2 mg/L and those of ceftazidime to ≤4 mg/L. Imipenem MICs ranged up to 64 mg/L for these organisms (Table 2).

MIC data for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and transconjugants with carbapenemases are shown in Table 3. NXL104 reduced cefotaxime MICs from >128 to ≤0.5 mg/L for most isolates with KPC enzymes and those of ceftazidime from ≥128 to ≤4 mg/L. The sole exception was Enterobacter aerogenes E624, which had KPC-4 enzyme, derepressed AmpC and porin loss, where the cefotaxime and ceftazidime MICs were reduced to 1 and 32 mg/L, respectively. In view of the good activity of the cefotaxime + NXL104 combination, it seems likely that the high MIC of ceftazidime + NXL104 reflected this combination of factors, rather than any specific trait of the KPC-4 enzyme.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. MIC distribution of NXL104 combination for isolates with carbapenemases

 
A Serratia marcescens isolate with SME-1 carbapenemase was not substantially resistant to cefotaxime and ceftazidime, as is typical of the phenotype; nevertheless, the cefotaxime MIC was reduced 4-fold in the presence of NXL104. Good synergy was seen for four Turkish isolates with OXA-48 enzyme—one E. coli and three K. pneumoniae—in which MICs of cefotaxime and ceftazidime generally were reduced from >64 to ≤2 mg/L. NXL104 achieved no significant reduction of the MICs of cefotaxime and ceftazidime for metallo-β-lactamase producers with IMP and VIM enzymes.

Taken as a whole, the activity of cephalosporin + NXL104 combinations against isolates and transconjugants with ESBLs and non-metallo-carbapenemases was impressive. Such combinations may provide a future alternative to carbapenems in infections due to ESBL, which are growing problems worldwide, and may also provide a route to overcoming isolates with carbapenem resistance contingent on KPC β-lactamases—another growing problem. The utility of these combinations depends, of course, on satisfactory pharmacokinetics, where phase I data show that a single 500 mg dose of NXL104 gave a Cmax of 10 mg/L with a t1/2 of 1.8 h.11 The lack of activity against metallo-β-lactamase producers is a limitation but might be overcome by combining NXL104 with a monobactam, as these compounds are stable to class B enzymes.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
We are grateful to Novexel for financial support of these studies.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
C. M. is an employee of Novexel and has stock options in the company. D. M. L. has acted as an advisor to Novexel and has received research finance from them and from numerous other pharmaceutical companies. He has shareholdings in GlaxoSmithKline, who were the original manufacturer of ceftazidime and other companies including Schering-Plough, Dechra, Pfizer and AstraZeneca and, as Enduring Attorney, manages shareholdings for a close relative in GlaxoSmithKline and Eco Animal Health. The remaining authors have none to declare.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 . Robbins M, Cassettari M, Dencer C, et al. In vitro activity of NXL 104(NXL), a new β-lactamase inhibitor, in combination with cefpodoxime (CPD) and cefixime (CFM) against 3rd generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates of species of the Enterobacteriaceae. In: Abstracts of the Forty-fifth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, DC, 2005. Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology. Abstract F-1161, p. 187.

2 . Livermore DM, Hawkey PM. CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother (2005) 56:451–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 . Livermore DM, Canton R, Gniadkowski M, et al. CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother (2007) 59:165–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 . Lewis JS, Herrera M, Wickes B, et al. First report of the emergence of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) as the predominant ESBL isolated in a U.S. health care system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:4015–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 . Naas T, Bogaerts P, Bauraing C, et al. Emergence of PER and VEB extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother (2006) 58:178–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 . Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev (2001) 14:933–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 . Woodford N, Dallow JW, Hill RL, et al. Ertapenem resistance among Klebsiella and Enterobacter submitted in the UK to a reference laboratory. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2007) 29:456–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8 . Woodford N, Tierno PM, Young K, et al. Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing a new carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A β-lactamase, KPC-3, in a New York Medical Center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 48:4793–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 . Bradford PA, Bratu S, Urban C, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella species possessing the class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing KPC-2 and inhibitor-resistant TEM-30 β-lactamases in New York City. Clin Infect Dis (2004) 39:55–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically—Sixth Edition: Approved Standard M7-A6 (2003) Villanova, PA, USA: NCCLS.

11 . Merdjan H, Tarral AM, Gerard PLP, et al. Safety, single dose pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibitor NXL104 in healthy young male adults. In: Abstracts of the Forty-seventh Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2007. Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology. Abstract A-809, p. 26.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Endimiani, J. M. DePasquale, S. Forero, F. Perez, A. M. Hujer, D. Roberts-Pollack, P. D. Fiorella, N. Pickens, B. Kitchel, A. E. Casiano-Colon, et al.
Emergence of blaKPC-containing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a long-term acute care hospital: a new challenge to our healthcare system
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2009; 64(5): 1102 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Has the era of untreatable infections arrived?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(suppl_1): i29 - i36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Stachyra, P. Levasseur, M.-C. Pechereau, A.-M. Girard, M. Claudon, C. Miossec, and M. T. Black
In vitro activity of the {beta}-lactamase inhibitor NXL104 against KPC-2 carbapenemase and Enterobacteriaceae expressing KPC carbapenemases
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2009; 64(2): 326 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Endimiani, Y. Choudhary, and R. A. Bonomo
In Vitro Activity of NXL104 in Combination with {beta}-Lactams against Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Producing KPC Carbapenemases
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2009; 53(8): 3599 - 3601.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Vidaillac, S. N. Leonard, H. S. Sader, R. N. Jones, and M. J. Rybak
In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens, Including {beta}-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2009; 53(6): 2360 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Woodford, D. W. Wareham, and on behalf of the UK Antibacterial Antisense Study
Tackling antibiotic resistance: a dose of common antisense?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2009; 63(2): 225 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/1053    most recent
dkn320v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Woodford, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Woodford, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?