Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on July 30, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn314
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/1156    most recent
dkn314v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenoll, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tarragó, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenoll, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tarragó, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research letter

In vitro activity of ME1036 versus other β-lactams against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes exhibiting higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC

Asunción Fenoll1, Lorenzo Aguilar2,*, Olga Robledo1, María-José Giménez2, Juan-José Granizo3, Donald Biek4 and David Tarragó1

1 Spanish National Reference Pneumococcal Laboratory, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, ctra. Majadahonda-Pozuelo Km. 2, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain 2 Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, University Complutense, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain 3 Grana Datos SL, c/Demetrio de la Guerra 4, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain 4 Cerexa, Inc., 1751 Harbor Bay Parkway, Alameda, CA 94502, USA


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-91-3941505; Fax: +34-91-3941511; E-mail: laguilar{at}med.ucm.es

Key Words: carbapenems , amoxicillin resistance , serotype 14 , serotype 6B , serotype 9V , serotype 19A

Sir,

It has been postulated that pneumococcal infections should be considered among the severe nosocomial diseases,1 and that Streptococcus pneumoniae should be covered by empirical therapy of hospital-acquired pneumonia together with methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the other principal Gram-positive, nosocomial respiratory pathogen. In a retrospective study carried out in Spain over the period 1995–2002, serotypes 14, 23F and 19 were those most frequently isolated in nosocomial S. pneumoniae bloodstream infections.1 These serotypes, together with 6B and 9V, have been reported as some of the most troublesome with regard to antimicrobial resistance.2 An additional problem is the reported spread of clones with higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC.2 The emergence of resistance to amoxicillin within existing penicillin-resistant clones is also related to macrolide and ciprofloxacin resistance,2 with levofloxacin non-susceptibility rates of 34% among the serotype 14 Spanish multiresistant clone.2 The genetic relatedness of these multidrug-resistant isolates, which suggests possible clonal expansion, raises the concern that it may be increasingly difficult to find adequate therapies for S. pneumoniae infections.

ME1036 is a novel parenteral carbapenem active against MRSA, β-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.35 The aim of this study was to explore the in vitro activity of ME1036 against recent penicillin-resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae showing higher amoxicillin versus penicillin MIC.

From the S. pneumoniae isolates received in the Spanish Pneumococcal Reference Laboratory (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) in the period January 2005 to September 2007, 220 penicillin-resistant isolates showing higher amoxicillin versus penicillin MIC were tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the agar dilution method6 using Mueller–Hinton agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) as culture media supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Biomedics, Madrid, Spain), with final inocula of 105 cfu/mL, and incubating under 5% CO2 atmosphere. S. pneumoniae ATCC 6303, S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and five clinical isolates were used as quality control strains as in all determinations carried out in the Spanish Reference Laboratory for Pneumococci. Minimum concentrations (mg/L) tested in the plates were 0.001 for ME1036, 0.007 for imipenem and meropenem, 0.015 for penicillin, ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime, 0.03 for cefuroxime, 0.06 for amoxicillin, 0.12 for erythromycin and 1 for levofloxacin. For all compounds, the maximum concentration tested in the plates was 32 mg/L, except for ampicillin (16 mg/L). Susceptibility breakpoints (mg/L) defined by CLSI were penicillin ≤0.06, amoxicillin ≤2, cefuroxime sodium ≤0.5, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime ≤1, imipenem ≤0.12, meropenem ≤0.25, erythromycin ≤0.25 and levofloxacin ≤2. CLSI breakpoints are not defined for ampicillin and ME1036. Serotyping was performed by the Quellung reaction and/or dot blot assay.

Of the 220 strains, 69 belonged to serotype 9V, 65 to serotype 14, 33 to serotype 6B, 27 to serotype 19A, 7 to serotype 19F, 5 were non-typeable and the other 14 strains belonged to other serotypes with less than five isolates. Table 1 shows susceptibility to study drugs for serotypes with more than 25 isolates. Susceptibility rates for penicillin, amoxicillin and cefuroxime were 0% and that for cefepime was <28%. Susceptibility rates to cefotaxime ranged from 26.2% for serotype 14 to 82.6% for serotype 9, whereas susceptibility rates to ceftriaxone were >88% for all serotypes. Susceptibility rates for imipenem and meropenem were ≤6.2% in all cases. The MIC90 value for ME1036 was 0.12 mg/L for all serotypes, which was at least 4-fold lower than imipenem, meropenem and ceftriaxone. Our findings suggest that against these multidrug-resistant pneumococcal isolates, the ranking of in vitro activity based on MIC90 for the β-lactams would be ME1036 (0.12 mg/L) (most active)>imipenem (0.5 mg/L)> meropenem (1 mg/L)>ceftriaxone (1 mg/L)>cefotaxime (2 mg/L)>penicillin=cefepime (4 mg/L)>amoxicillin (8–16 mg/L)>cefuroxime (16 mg/L)>ampicillin (≥16 mg/L) (least active).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. MIC50, MIC90 (mg/L) and percentage of susceptibility to study drugs for penicillin-resistant strains exhibiting higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC for serotypes with more than 25 isolates with this resistance phenotype

 
A previous study that employed agar dilution testing against a smaller number of non-selected penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates reported an MIC90 value of 0.03 mg/L for ME1036,4 a value two dilutions lower than the MIC90 value determined in this study against multidrug-resistant strains belonging to troublesome serotypes exhibiting higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC. MIC90 values determined for ME1036 by broth microdilution against a small number (11 strains) of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates in a previous study showed values similar to those in the present study.3

In conclusion, ME1036 exhibited excellent intrinsic activity against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae belonging to serotypes 9V, 14, 6B and 19A, exhibiting higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC. The spread of multidrug resistance that includes β-lactams (including penicillins, second- and third-generation cephalosporins and previous carbapenems) may challenge empirical hospital treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. The high intrinsic activity of ME1036 against resistant strains of S. pneumoniae may represent an advantage when broad-spectrum activity is required.


    Funding
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Forest Laboratories, Inc.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
D. B. is an employee of Cerexa Inc. Others authors: none to declare.


    References
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 . Bouza E, Pintado V, Rivera S, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Infect (2005) 11:919–24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 . Pérez-Trallero E, Marimón JM, Ercibengoa M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of amoxicillin non-susceptible versus susceptible isolates among penicillin non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Infect (2007) 13:937–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3 . Sahm D, Draghi D, Thornsberry C. Activity of ME1036, a novel anti-MRSA carbapenem, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. In: Abstracts of the 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2006. Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology. Abstract F1-236, p. 201.

4 . Kurazono M, Ida T, Yamada K, et al. In vitro activities of ME1036 (CP5609), a novel parenteral carbapenem, against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 48:2831–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 . Sader HS, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activities of ceftaroline and ME1036 tested against clinical strains of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2008) 52:1153–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 . Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically—Seventh Edition: Approved Standard M7-A7 (2006) Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
I. Morrissey, D. Biek, and R. Janes
ME1036, a novel carbapenem, with enhanced activity against clinical isolates causing bacteraemic community-acquired pneumonia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2009; 64(1): 209 - 210.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/5/1156    most recent
dkn314v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenoll, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tarragó, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenoll, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tarragó, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?