Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on February 6, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/651    most recent
dkn006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darouiche, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madhyastha, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darouiche, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madhyastha, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Efficacy of combination of chlorhexidine and protamine sulphate against device-associated pathogens

Rabih O. Darouiche1,*, Mohammad D. Mansouri1, Purushottam V. Gawande2 and Srinivasa Madhyastha2

1 Center for Prostheses Infection and Infectious Disease Section, Michael E. Debakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA 2 Kane Biotech Inc., 5-1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 6C6


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-713-799-5088; Fax: +1-713-799-5058; E-mail: rdarouiche{at}aol.com

Received 21 August 2007; returned 20 December 2007; revised 27 December 2007; accepted 31 December 2007


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine: (i) the potential in vitro synergy of combining protamine sulphate (PS) with chlorhexidine (CHX); (ii) the in vitro spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters; and (iii) the in vivo efficacy of CHX + PS-coated catheters in comparison with silver-hydrogel-coated and uncoated catheters.

Methods: The potential synergistic antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of CHX and PS were investigated in vitro by the MIC and biofilm assays. The spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters were studied in vitro by using a serial plate transfer method. The in vivo efficacy of CHX + PS-coated catheters was assessed in a rabbit model against Escherichia coli.

Results: In vitro studies showed that the combination of CHX + PS has a synergistic inhibitory effect on E. coli and provides a significant synergistic antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity against E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Furthermore, catheters coated with CHX + PS provided a broad-spectrum and enduring in vitro antimicrobial activity over a 10 day period. The in vivo efficacy study demonstrated that subcutaneously implanted CHX + PS-coated catheters in rabbits are significantly less likely to become colonized (2/28 = 7%) than either silver-hydrogel-coated (25/28 = 89%; P < 0.001) or uncoated catheters (18/28 = 64%; P < 0.001) by E. coli.

Conclusions: The synergistic, broad-spectrum and durable in vitro activity of the CHX + PS combination and the robust in vivo efficacy of catheters coated with this unique composition encourage clinical evaluation of this innovative approach.

Key Words: device-related infections , antimicrobial activity , Escherichia coli


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Medical devices constitute an increasingly essential component of modern healthcare. Infection is generally the most common serious complication of these devices. The escalating use of long-established and new medical devices has further magnified the problem of device-associated infections, particularly in patients at inherently high risk of infection.1 Device-associated infections are generally cumbersome to manage, have great impact on the quality of life, result in excessive prolongation of hospital stays and are expensive to treat.25 The serious medical complications, problematic management and economic sequelae of device-related infections have prompted a keen interest in exploring innovative preventive approaches.6

Bacterial colonization of the medical devices is a prelude to device-related infection. Antimicrobial modification of the surface of medical devices has the potential of resisting bacterial adherence to the device and, possibly, preventing device-related infection. Although the lack of in vitro efficacy usually indicates the absence of in vivo efficacy, not all antimicrobial-coated surfaces that repel bacterial adherence in vitro can prevent device colonization and device-related infection in vivo. This variable in vivo efficacy could be attributed, at least in part, to the type of antimicrobial agents used for surface treatment of the device. We elected to explore the efficacy of the unique combination of chlorhexidine plus protamine sulphate (CHX + PS) because: (i) CHX possesses broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity7 that is partly attributed to disruption of the cellular plasma membrane,8 and the cationic polypeptide PS increases the permeability of cell membrane, thereby facilitating the transport of antimicrobial compounds to the cytoplasm;9,10 and (ii) both CHX11 and PS12 have been separately reported to be active in vivo against biofilm-associated infections.

The objectives of this study were to examine: (i) the potential in vitro synergy of combining CHX and PS; (ii) the in vitro antimicrobial activity and durability of CHX + PS-coated catheters; and (iii) the in vivo anti-infective efficacy of CHX + PS-coated catheters in comparison with silver-hydrogel-coated and uncoated catheters. Since urinary catheters are the most commonly utilized medical devices and are associated with a relatively high rate of colonization and infection,13,14 we used bladder catheters in this study.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Chemicals, microorganisms and culture conditions

All used chemicals (including media ingredients) were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) or BD Diagnostic Systems (Sparks, MD, USA). We tested eight device-associated clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and Candida albicans, plus one American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) isolate of Staphylococcus epidermidis. All strains were maintained at –80°C in 15% glycerol and recovered onto Luria–Bertani (LB) agar or tryptic soy agar (TSA). The assay for zone of inhibition and microbiological assessment of catheter segments explanted from animals were performed using Mueller–Hinton agar and trypticase sheep agar, respectively. For inoculum preparation, an isolated colony was inoculated into LB broth or tryptic soy broth (TSB) and incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h.

MIC assay

The MICs of CHX, PS and the CHX + PS combination for nine organisms including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. faecalis, VRE and C. albicans were determined by using a broth microdilution assay in 96-well microtitre plate as described previously.15 Briefly, bacterial strains and C. albicans were grown overnight at 37°C with 100 rpm shaking in TSB and diluted to ~105 cfu/mL. A 100 µL aliquot of bacterial or fungal suspension was added to each well. Aliquots (100 µL) of 2x CHX (100 mg/L) and PS (400 mg/L) alone and in combination were then added to the first column of wells of the microtitre plate. The content of the microtitre plate wells was mixed with a multipipettor and 2-fold serial dilutions were performed to achieve the desired concentrations of CHX (50–0.098 mg/L) and PS (200–0.195 mg/L) alone and in combination. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and read at 600 nm using a microtitre plate reader (Multiskan Ascent, Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). The MIC was assessed as the lowest antimicrobial concentration that completely inhibited growth. The MIC assay was repeated two times with consistent results. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) of CHX and PS was calculated as the MIC of each agent when used in combination with the other agent divided by its MIC when used alone. Each antimicrobial combination produced two fractions, which were summated to produce the FIC index (FICI). Synergy was defined by an FICI value of ≤0.5, no interaction was defined by an FICI value of >0.5–4.0 and antagonism was defined by an FICI value of >4.

Biofilm assay

The biofilm was assayed using a modified quantitative method that had been described previously.16 The overnight cultures of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis and C. albicans were diluted to 5% in TSB. Bacterial and fungal biofilms were designed to form at 37°C in 12-well tissue culture polystyrene plates (Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA). The 100-fold concentrated aqueous stock solutions of CHX and PS were prepared individually and in combination. To achieve the desired tested concentrations, 20 µL aliquots were added to each well of the 12-well plates. The total volume of each well was brought up to 2 mL (thereby resulting in 100-fold dilution of antimicrobial agents) with sterile distilled water. The wells without antimicrobial agents served as control. After incubation for 24 h, the medium containing planktonic cells in each well was removed and the biofilm was rinsed with PBS. After adding 2 mL of PBS to each well, the plate was sonicated for 1 min and the dislodged biofilm was mixed well with the pipette tip, as previously reported.16 The 1 mL suspension from each well was then diluted 10-fold and 100 µL aliquots from each dilution were inoculated onto TSA plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and colonies were enumerated.

Catheters

We tested three groups of 14 French urinary catheters: (i) sterile uncoated silicone catheters (Rusch, Inc., GA, USA); (ii) silicone catheters (Rusch, Inc.) that we coated with CHX + PS by dipping in a solution that contained CHX (400 mg/mL) and PS (100 mg/mL)17 and then gas sterilized with ethylene oxide; and (iii) sterile silver-hydrogel-coated catheters (Bardex I.C.® foley catheter, C.R. Bard, Inc., Covington, GA, USA), the most commonly utilized surface-modified urinary catheter in North America.

In vitro spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of coated catheters

The in vitro spectrum and durability of CHX + PS-coated catheters in comparison with control uncoated catheters were assessed by using a modified Kirby–Bauer technique.18 One centimetre long segments of uncoated and CHX + PS-coated silicone catheters (4 mm external diameter) were pressed onto the centre of the agar plate that had been freshly inoculated with one of the six tested organisms. After incubating the agar plate at 37°C for 24 h, the overall zone of inhibition was determined by measuring the diameter of the clear zone of inhibition perpendicular to the long axis of the catheter segment. The actual zones of inhibition were recorded by subtracting the external diameter of the catheter (4 mm) from each measurement. The catheter segments were transferred daily to fresh lawns on Mueller–Hinton agar. The diameter of the zone of inhibition (in mm) is expressed as the mean value from three tested samples.

In the clinical setting, coated urinary catheters would be in constant contact with urine, thereby allowing for detachment of the antimicrobial coating agents. To simulate this process, CHX + PS-coated and uncoated control catheter segments were placed in separate 500 mL flasks and soaked in 100 mL of sterile artificial urine medium.19 The flasks were incubated at 37°C with 100 rpm shaking. Half of the artificial urine medium was replaced by fresh medium every 2 days, as described previously.20 Catheter segments were removed from the flask after 1, 3, 5 and 7 days to perform adhesion assay against E. coli and S. epidermidis.21 The catheter segments were rinsed in 1 mL PBS and placed in 10 mL BHI broth. The tubes were inoculated with 100 µL of bacterial suspension (107 cfu/mL) and incubated in a water bath for 3 h at 37°C with gentle shaking. After incubation, the catheter segments were washed three times in sterile normal saline and transferred to 1 mL of sterile normal saline. Adherent bacteria were removed by sonication for 30 s, followed by vortexing for 1 min. Bacterial cells were serially diluted in saline and then plated onto LB agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and colonies were counted.

In vivo efficacy of coated catheters in rabbit model of E. coli infection

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Baylor College of Medicine. A previously described rabbit model of Gram-negative bacterial infection of subcutaneously inserted devices was used.21 Female New-Zealand White, specific pathogen-free rabbits (body weight 2–3 kg) were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection (0.5 mL/kg body weight) of a mixture of ketamine (70 mg/kg body weight) and acepromazine (2 mg/kg body weight). To simulate the practice of administering per-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in human patients, each animal received immediately after induction of anaesthesia an intramuscular injection of vancomycin (20 mg/kg), which is active against Gram-positive organisms but not E. coli. The backs of rabbits were shaved, then prepared and draped in a sterile fashion. Six 2 cm long catheter segments, including two CHX + PS-coated, two silver-hydrogel-coated and two uncoated, were subcutaneously inserted 4 cm lateral to the spine and away from each other. A total of 84 catheter segments were placed in 14 rabbits. Based on the findings of a pilot trial that was initially performed to determine the optimal bacterial inoculum required for colonization of most uncoated catheter segments, a 50 µL aliquot of 2 x 106 cfu/mL (absolute inoculum of 105 cfu) of a clinical strain of E. coli was inoculated onto the surface of inserted catheter segments. After suturing the wounds and achieving sternal recumbence, the rabbits were monitored daily for signs of local infection, sepsis or major distress.

Bacteriological assessment

Rabbits were sacrificed 1 week after surgery. Blood samples were collected from rabbits prior to euthanasia and inoculated onto trypticase sheep agar plates containing 10% sheep blood. To prevent possible contamination of the catheter segment during explantation by organisms at and around the surgical site, an incision was made 2 cm medial to the surgical wound to remove the catheter segment utilizing an electrosurgical cutter. All retrieved catheter segments were quantitatively cultured by using the sonication technique, with a detectability limit of 20 cfu.21 After explanting the catheter segments, qualitative swab cultures of the site adjacent to the catheter segments were obtained. Bacterial growth was assessed after incubating the inoculated agar plates at 37°C for 48 h.

The two primary outcomes of the animal study were catheter colonization and catheter-related infection. Catheter colonization was defined as isolation of the inoculated strain of E. coli from sonication cultures of explanted catheter segment. The diagnosis of catheter-related infection was made in the presence of E. coli colonization of explanted catheter segments plus growth of E. coli from swab cultures of subcutaneous tissue adjacent to the catheter segment. A secondary outcome of the mean bacterial cfu retrieved from the explanted catheter segments was also compared among the three study groups.

Statistical analysis

The rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related infection were compared between the different groups by using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test (STATA, version 8; Stata-Corp., College Station, TX, USA). The mean bacterial counts retrieved from the explanted catheter segments were compared among the three groups by using the two-tailed Student’s t-test with unequal variance. A P value of <0.05 indicated significant differences.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Antimicrobial activity of CHX and PS

The MICs of CHX, PS and the CHX + PS combination for bacterial and fungal organisms are shown in Table 1. The MICs of CHX ranged from 0.195 (for S. epidermidis) to 12.5 mg/L (for P. aeruginosa) and were generally lower than the MICs of PS which ranged from 3.25 (for S. epidermidis) to >200 mg/L (for K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis). The FICI for CHX + PS combination varied from 0.5 to 1.25 with an appreciable synergistic inhibitory effect on E. coli.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. MICs (mg/L) and FICIs of chlorhexidine (CHX) and protamine sulphate (PS) alone and the CHX + PS combination for catheter-associated pathogensa

 
Antibiofilm activity of CHX and PS

As Figure 1 shows, the combination of CHX + PS significantly inhibited biofilm formation due to E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis as compared with either no antimicrobial agent or individual antimicrobial agents (P < 0.05), thereby indicating possible synergistic effects between CHX and PS. The biofilm formed by P. aeruginosa was almost completely inhibited when CHX and PS were used together at a concentration of 25 mg/L each. Although synergy between CHX and PS was not observed when assessing biofilm formation by K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and C. albicans, the CHX + PS combination inhibited more than 99% biofilm formation by each of these three organisms (0.0001%, 0.01% and 0.001%, respectively).


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Effect of normal saline control, chlorhexidine (CHX) and protamine sulphate (PS) alone and the CHX + PS combination on biofilm formation in E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis as determined by 12-well plate assay. Error bars are not visible where the SDs are less than the area occupied by a given symbol. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between biofilm formation in the presence of the CHX + PS combination and CHX and PS alone, and normal saline control.

 
In vitro spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters

The CHX + PS-coated catheter segments displayed zones of inhibition against all six tested organisms, with enduring antimicrobial activity after 10 days of serial plate transfer (Figure 2). No zone of inhibition was detected around the control uncoated catheter segments. Furthermore, antimicrobial coating of catheters prevented ≥80% of E. coli and S. epidermidis colonization after soaking the catheter in sterile artificial urine medium for 1, 3, 5 and 7 days (Figure 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. In vitro spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters as reflected by zone of inhibition. The zones were measured (in mm) and recorded results represent the average of three segments. The actual zones of inhibition were recorded by subtracting the external diameter of the catheter (4 mm) from each measurement.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. In vitro spectrum and durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters in synthetic urine medium. Adhesion assay was performed for 3 h in BHI broth at 37°C after soaking in synthetic urine medium for 1, 3, 5 and 7 days. Error bars are not visible where the SDs are less than the area occupied by a given symbol. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between viable cells adherent to CHX + PS-coated catheter and uncoated control catheter.

 
In vivo efficacy of CHX + PS-coated catheters

All 14 rabbits tolerated surgery well and exhibited no evidence of sepsis or failure to thrive. Blood cultures from all 14 sacrificed rabbits were sterile. Two out of 28 (7%) CHX + PS-coated catheters, 25/28 (89%) silver-hydrogel-coated catheters and 18/28 (64%) uncoated catheters became colonized with E. coli. The CHX + PS-coated catheters were significantly less likely to be colonized than either silver-hydrogel-coated catheters (P < 0.001) or uncoated catheters (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.055) in the rate of colonization of silver-hydrogel-coated versus uncoated catheters. Furthermore, 1/28 (4%) CHX + PS-coated catheters, 12/28 (43%) silver-hydrogel-coated catheters and 14/28 (50%) uncoated catheters resulted in infection due to E. coli. The CHX + PS-coated catheters were significantly less likely to cause infection than either silver-hydrogel-coated catheters (P = 0.001) or uncoated catheters (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.79) in the incidence of infection caused by silver-hydrogel-coated versus uncoated catheters.

The mean numbers of bacterial colony counts retrieved from catheter segments were 4.6 x 105 cfu in the CHX + PS-coated catheter group, 2.5 x 106 cfu in the silver-hydrogel group and 8.3 x 106 cfu in the uncoated group. The mean number of bacterial colony counts retrieved from uncoated catheter segments was significantly higher than those originating from CHX + PS-coated (P = 0.028) or silver-hydrogel-coated catheters (P = 0.023). There were, however, no significant differences in the mean number of bacterial colony counts retrieved from CHX + PS-coated catheters versus silver-hydrogel-coated catheters (P = 0.23).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
We assessed the potential antimicrobial enhancing effect of PS on the antimicrobial activity of CHX against planktonic catheter-associated organisms and found either synergy or no interaction between CHX and PS. The CHX + PS combination was notably synergistic against E. coli, a very common uropathogen, and was not antagonistic against any of the other tested pathogens.

Because of the relatively slow bacterial growth within the biofilm, inhibition of antimicrobial activity by biofilm substances and poor penetration of some antimicrobials into the biofilm, the MICs for biofilm-embedded organisms can be up to 100–1000-fold higher than those for planktonic counterparts.2026 The results of this study reaffirm the patterns of resistance to antimicrobial agents by biofilm-embedded organisms. For instance, a CHX concentration of 12.5 mg/L CHX, which is 64-fold higher than its MIC (0.195 mg/L) for planktonic S. epidermidis organisms, failed to completely inhibit the growth of biofilm-embedded S. epidermidis. Although one option to counteract this clinical quandary would be to use antibiotics at supratherapeutic concentrations as is the case with antibiotic lock solutions,27 the use of high concentrations of CHX poses safety concerns in the clinical setting. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the impact of combining PS with CHX in an attempt to enhance the antimicrobial activity of CHX. The CHX + PS combination was significantly more active against E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis biofilms than either agent alone. These results support previous reports describing the synergistic antimicrobial and antibiofilm impact of combining PS with either antibiotics (rifampicin, ciprofloxacin or vancomycin) or non-antibiotic compounds (N,N-[1,2 phenylene]dimaleimide, EDTA or ovotransferrin) both in vitro and in vivo.12,2832 Furthermore, PS has been reported to bind firmly to surfaces such as stainless steels and to inhibit surface colonization by Staphylococcus spp.33

CHX + PS-coated devices are intended to inhibit bacterial presence both on the device surface and within the biofilm layer surrounding the implanted devices. The biofilm layer contains a variety of host-derived adhesins to which different organisms variably adhere. For instance, S. aureus adheres tightly to fibronectin, fibrinogen, collagen and, to a lesser extent, laminin, whereas S. epidermidis adheres only to fibronectin but not to the other host-derived adhesins.34,35 Gram-negative bacilli, enterococci and Candida account for about two-thirds, one-quarter and one-tenth, respectively, of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, whereas staphylococci, Gram-negative bacilli and Candida account for almost three-quarters, one-fifth and one-tenth, respectively, of infections associated with central venous catheters.1,36 The results of this study indicate that devices coated with the combination of CHX and PS provide in vitro durability against a variety of Gram-negative bacilli (E. coli and K. pneumoniae) and Gram-positive cocci (E. faecalis, S. epidermidis and S. aureus) as well as C. albicans. In addition, coated catheters exhibited significantly less colonization (P < 0.05) by E. coli and S. epidermidis compared with uncoated control catheters after being soaked in sterile artificial urine medium for 1, 3, 5 and 7 days. Retention of antimicrobial activity for 7–10 days showed that the antimicrobial agents were not burst released into the medium at the very beginning. Thus, the combination of CHX + PS may prove to be active against many pathogens responsible for infections associated with urinary or vascular catheters.

Lower numbers of E. coli organisms adhered in vivo to both the silver-hydrogel-coated and the CHX + PS-coated catheters as compared with uncoated catheters. Even more importantly, this study demonstrated that devices whose surfaces were modified with CHX + PS, but not with silver-hydrogel, reduced in vivo the incidence of device colonization and device-related infection by E. coli. This superior in vivo efficacy of CHX + PS-coated versus silver-hydrogel-coated catheters against infection by E. coli may be attributed to three factors: (i) production of appreciable zones of inhibition by the former but not the latter catheters (because silver molecules are relatively tightly bound to the surface of the catheter) taking into consideration that the production of no or small zone of inhibition in vitro by other types of antimicrobial coatings can predict the lack of anti-infective efficacy in vivo;37 (ii) the relatively long in vitro durability of antimicrobial activity of CHX + PS-coated catheters against catheter-associated pathogens, in comparison with the previously reported findings on silver-hydrogel-coated catheters;38 and (iii) the in vitro synergistic antibiofilm activity of the CHX + PS combination that could be attributed to the ability of PS to increase the permeability of microbial cell membrane and dilate the ion channels, thereby facilitating the transport of other antimicrobial compounds to the cytoplasm.9

In summary, this study indicated that the CHX + PS combination may provide a strong and synergistic antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity in vitro and, more importantly, demonstrated a robust in vivo protection against E. coli that is afforded by incorporating this unique antimicrobial composition onto devices. It would be prudent to further evaluate the potential of using the CHX + PS composition as an anti-infective coating to prevent infections associated with medical devices, particularly those that are primarily infected by Gram-negative bacteria as is the case with urological and intra-abdominal devices. As with other types of antimicrobial-coated devices, it is essential to judiciously limit the use of such anti-infective approaches to patients who either have an unacceptably high risk of infection or in whom infection can lead to serious medical consequences and/or economic sequelae.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Kane Biotech Inc., Winnipeg, MB, Canada provided funds for conducting this study.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The right to the coating method that was used to incorporate the combination of CHX and PS onto the surfaces of devices was assigned by Dr Darouiche and Mr Mansouri to their employer Baylor College of Medicine. Dr Darouiche has served as a consultant for Kane Biotech Inc.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported by Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 . Darouiche RO. Device-associated infections: a macroproblem that starts with microadhesion. Clin Infect Dis (2001) 33:1567–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 . Boxma H, Brekhuizen T, Patka P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: The Dutch Trauma Trial. Lancet (1996) 347:1133–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3 . Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med (2004) 350:1422–9.[Free Full Text]

4 . Haley RW. Estimating the extra charges and prolongation of hospitalization due to nosocomial infections: a comparison of methods. J Infect Dis (1980) 141:248–57.[Web of Science][Medline]

5 . Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthropedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol (2002) 23:183–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6 . Darouiche RO. Antimicrobial approaches for preventing infections associated with surgical implants. Clin Infect Dis (2003) 36:1284–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

7 . Steinberg D, Heling I, Daniel I, et al. Antibacterial synergistic effect of chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide against Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. J Oral Rehabil (1999) 26:151–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8 . Kuyyakanond T, Quesnel LB. The mechanism of action of chlorhexidine. FEMS Microbiol Lett (1992) 79:211–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

9 . Antohi S, Popescu A. Lethal effect of protamine and histone on competent Bacillus subtilis cells. Mol Gen Genet (1979) 170:345–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

10 . Aspedon A, Groisman EA. The antibacterial action of protamine: evidence for disruption of cytoplasmic membrane energization in Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiology (1996) 142:3389–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 . Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med (1997) 127:257–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 . Teichman JMH, Abraham VE, Stein PC, et al. Protamine sulfate and vancomycin are synergistic against Staphylococcus epidermidis prosthesis infection in vivo. J Urol (1994) 152:213–6.[Medline]

13 . Nickel JC. A practical approach to urinary tract infections. Can J Diag (1993) 10:64–80.

14 . Stamm WE. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Am J Med (1991) 91:65–71.[CrossRef]

15 . Amsterdam D. Susceptibility testing of antimicrobials in liquid media. In: Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine—Loman V, ed. (1996) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 52–111.

16 . Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, et al. Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol (2002) 184:290–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 . Mansouri MD, Darouiche RO. Method for treating medical devices using glycerol and an antimicrobial agent. (2003) US patent number 6,589,591.

18 . Sherert RD, Forman DM, Solomon DD. Efficacy of dicloxacillin-coated polyurethane catheters in preventing subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1989) 33:1174–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 . Brooks T, Keevil CW. A simple artificial urine for the growth of urinary pathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol (1997) 24:203–6.[CrossRef][Medline]

20 . Cormio L, Forgia PL, Forgia DL, et al. Bacterial adhesion to urethral catheters: role of coating materials and immersion in antibiotic solution. Eur Urol (2001) 40:354–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

21 . Darouiche RO, Mansouri MD, Meade R. In vitro and in vivo activity of antimicrobial-coated prosthetic heart valve sewing cuffs. J Heart Valve Dis (2002) 11:99–104.[Medline]

22 . Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science (1999) 284:1318–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23 . Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev (2002) 15:167–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24 . Farber BF, Kaplan MH, Okuma A. Staphylococcus epidermidis extracted slime inhibits the antimicrobial action of aminoglycocide antibiotics. J Infect Dis (1988) 161:37–40.

25 . Nickel JC, Ruseska I, Wright JB, et al. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1985) 27:619–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26 . Widmer AF, Frei R, Rajacic Z, et al. Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections. J Infect Dis (1990) 162:96–102.[Web of Science][Medline]

27 . Krishnasami Z, Carlton D, Bimbo L, et al. Management of hemodialysis catheter-related bacteremia with an adjunctive antibiotic lock solution. Kidney Int (2002) 61:1136–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

28 . Burton E, Gawande PV, Yakandawala N, et al. Antibiofilm activity of GlmU enzyme inhibitors against catheter-associated uropathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2006) 50:1835–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29 . Hansen LT, Austin JW, Gill TA. Antibacterial effect of protamine in combination with EDTA and refrigeration. Int J Food Microbiol (2001) 15:149–61.

30 . Richards GK, Prentis J, Gagnon RF. The effect of protamine on antibiotic action against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. ASAIO Trans (1990) 36:M296–9.[Medline]

31 . Soboh F, Khoury AE, Zamboni AC, et al. Effects of ciprofloxacin and protamine sulfate combinations against catheter-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1995) 39:1281–6.[Abstract]

32 . Yakandawala N, Gawande PV, LoVetri K, et al. Effect of ovotransferrin, protamine sulfate and EDTA combination on biofilm formation by catheter-associated bacteria. J Appl Microbiol (2007) 102:722–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

33 . Matsumura Y, Yamada K, Takahashi M, et al. Properties of bacterial corrosion of stainless steel and its inhibition by protamine coating. Biocontrol Sci (2007) 12:21–9.[Medline]

34 . Hermann M, Vaudaux PE, Pittet D, et al. Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material. J Infect Dis (1988) 158:693–701.[Web of Science][Medline]

35 . Vaudaux P, Pittet D, Haeberli A, et al. Host factors selectively increase staphylococcal adherence on inserted catheters: a role for fibronectin and fibrinogen or fibrin. J Infect Dis (1989) 160:865–75.[Web of Science][Medline]

36 . Tunney MM, Gorman SP, Patrick S. Infection associated with medical devices. Rev Med Microbiol (1996) 7:195–205.

37 . Sherertz RJ, Heard SO, Raad II, et al. {gamma}-Radiation-sterilized, triple-lumen catheters coated with low concentration of chlorhexidine were not efficacious at preventing catheter infections in intensive care unit patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1996) 40:1995–7.[Abstract]

38 . Johnson JR, Delavari P, Azar M. Activities of a nitrofurazone-containing urinary catheter and a silver hydrogel catheter against multidrug-resistant bacteria characteristic of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1999) 43:2990–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
T. Nuryastuti, H. C. van der Mei, H. J. Busscher, S. Iravati, A. T. Aman, and B. P. Krom
Effect of Cinnamon Oil on icaA Expression and Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2009; 75(21): 6850 - 6855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. J. Opperman, S. M. Kwasny, J. D. Williams, A. R. Khan, N. P. Peet, D. T. Moir, and T. L. Bowlin
Aryl Rhodanines Specifically Inhibit Staphylococcal and Enterococcal Biofilm Formation
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4357 - 4367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/651    most recent
dkn006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darouiche, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madhyastha, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darouiche, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madhyastha, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?