Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on November 30, 2007

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkm463
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/2/411    most recent
dkm463v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asano-Mori, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kurokawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asano-Mori, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kurokawa, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

False-positive Aspergillus galactomannan antigenaemia after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Yuki Asano-Mori1,2, Yoshinobu Kanda1, Kumi Oshima1, Shinichi Kako1, Akihito Shinohara1, Hideki Nakasone1, Makoto Kaneko1, Hiroyuki Sato1, Takuro Watanabe1, Noriko Hosoya3, Koji Izutsu1, Takashi Asai1, Akira Hangaishi1, Toru Motokura1, Shigeru Chiba3 and Mineo Kurokawa1,*

1 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 2 Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan 3 Department of Cell Therapy and Transplantation Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan


* Corresponding author. Tel: +81-3-5800-9092; Fax: +81-3-5840-8667; E-mail: kurokawa-tky{at}umin.ac.jp

Received 2 September 2007; returned 2 November 2007; revised 8 October 2007; accepted 4 November 2007


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: Although Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) antigen detection is widely applied in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA), false-positive reactions with fungus-derived antibiotics, other fungal genera or the passage of dietary GM through injured mucosa are a matter of concern. The aim of this study was to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia.

Patients and methods: The records of 157 adult allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients were retrospectively analysed. Episodes of positive GM antigenaemia, defined as two consecutive GM results with an optical density index above 0.6, were classified into true, false and inconclusive GM antigenaemia by reviewing the clinical course.

Results: Twenty-five patients developed proven or probable IA with a 1 year cumulative incidence of 12.9%, whereas 50 experienced positive GM antigenaemia with an incidence of 32.2%. Among the total 58 positive episodes of the 50 patients, 29 were considered false-positive. The positive predictive value (PPV) was lower during the first 100 days than beyond 100 days after HSCT (37.5% versus 58.8%). Gastrointestinal chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was identified as the only independent significant factor for the increased incidence of false-positive GM antigenaemia (PPV 0% versus 66.7%, P = 0.02).

Conclusions: GM antigen results must be considered cautiously in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures including computed tomography scans, especially during the first 100 days after HSCT and in patients with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD.

Key Words: fungal infections , invasive aspergillosis , chronic GVHD , gastrointestinal tract , mucosal damage


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains one of the leading infectious causes of death after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), despite new antifungal agents that have become available in recent years.1 The high mortality rate of IA was mainly attributed to the difficulty of diagnosis at the early stage of the disease, because histopathological examinations require invasive procedures and fungal cultures have low specificity and sensitivity in detecting IA.

Monitoring of the circulating Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) antigen by the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a feasible non-invasive biological method for early diagnosis of IA.2 The GM ELISA test has sensitivity of 67% to 100% and specificity of 81% to 99% in neutropenic patients and allogeneic transplant recipients,36 and was introduced as microbiological evidence in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria for opportunistic invasive fungal infection.7 However, a concern is the false-positive reactions, which may lead to inappropriate invasive investigation or overtreatment with antifungal agents. Previous studies have reported various risk factors for the false-positive results, including early childhood,3 the development of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD),8 the passage of GM of food origin9,10 and certain exoantigens from other fungal genera11 or fungus-derived antibiotics.12,13 However, little is known about the exact mechanism of false-positive reactions with these factors.

To clarify the cause of false-positive results, we retrospectively analysed the incidence and risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia in allogeneic HSCT recipients.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Study population

GM ELISA became available at the University of Tokyo Hospital as a routine diagnostic test in February 2000. During a 5 year period (February 2000 to May 2005), 163 consecutive adult patients (>16 years old) underwent allogeneic HSCT at the University of Tokyo Hospital. The medical records of 157 patients who had at least two GM ELISA tests after HSCT were available for a retrospective analysis of positive GM antigenaemia. The median follow-up was 519 days (range, 15–2090 days) after HSCT. The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Acute leukaemia in first remission, chronic myelogenous leukaemia in first chronic phase, myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anaemia or refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts, and aplastic anaemia were defined as low-risk diseases, whereas others were considered high-risk diseases. Donors other than human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors were defined as alternative donors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Patients' characteristics

 
Transplantation procedure

The conventional preparative regimen for leukaemia/lymphoma was mainly performed with either cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens or busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens. In cyclophosphamide/TBI-based regimens, the dose of cyclophosphamide was decreased and etoposide was added instead in patients with impaired cardiac function. Fludarabine-based regimens were used as reduced-intensity regimens for elderly or clinically infirm patients.14 Cyclosporin A or tacrolimus was administered combined with short-term methotrexate for prophylaxis against GVHD. Alemtuzumab was added for patients who received a graft from an HLA-mismatched donor.15 Methyl-prednisolone or prednisolone at 1 or 2 mg/kg was added for patients who developed grade II–IV acute GVHD, whereas prednisolone at 0.5 mg/kg or more was added for patients who developed extensive chronic GVHD. Prophylaxis against bacterial, herpes simplex virus and Pneumocystis jirovecii infections consisted of tosufloxacin, aciclovir and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.

Antigen detection

GM assay was performed at least every other week after HSCT until discharge from the hospital in the majority of patients. In the outpatient setting, the monitoring of GM was continued at each visit in patients who were receiving immunosuppressive therapy, at the discretion of attending physicians. Circulating Aspergillus GM was detected using a sandwich immunocapture ELISA (Platelia Aspergillus, Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) using a rat anti-GM monoclonal antibody.2 The technique was performed as recommended by the manufacturer. The optical absorbance of specimens and controls was determined with a spectrophotometer set at 450 and 620 nm wavelengths. The optical density (OD) index for each sample was calculated by dividing the optical absorbance of the clinical sample by that of the threshold control. Two consecutive serum samples with an OD index of 0.6 or more were considered positive.16

Antifungal prophylaxis and treatment for IA

As antifungal prophylaxis, fluconazole at 200 mg was principally given daily from day –14 until the end of immunosuppressive therapy. For patients with a history of IA, intravenous micafungin at 150–300 mg or oral itraconazole at 200 mg was administered instead. All patients were isolated in high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered rooms from the start of the conditioning regimen to engraftment. Febrile neutropenia was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics in accordance with the published guidelines.17 Antifungal treatment was started when febrile neutropenia persisted for at least 3–4 days or when IA was confirmed or suspected with clinical or radiological signs.

Diagnosis procedures and definitions

Diagnostic procedures included routine cultures of urine and stools, repeated cultures of blood and sputum, weekly chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and nasal sinus and, when possible, bronchoscopic examinations and open biopsy. CT scans were principally obtained for patients with (i) clinical signs and/or symptoms suggestive of IA, (ii) persistent or recurrent febrile neutropenia while on broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, (iii) infiltrates or nodules on chest X-ray or (iv) positive GM antigenaemia. In patients with clinical suspicion of IA, bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and/or tissue biopsy were also performed whenever feasible. A diagnosis of IA was classified as proven or probable on the basis of the EORTC/MSG definitions.7 True-positive GM antigenaemia was defined as two consecutive positive results with the established diagnosis of proven or probable IA. Positive GM antigenaemia in episodes that did not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for proven or probable IA was considered as inconclusive-positive if (i) sufficient examinations including chest and/or sinus CT scans were not performed despite the presence of compatible clinical signs and symptoms of IA or (ii) the possibility that the radiological abnormalities on the CT scans were due to IA could not be denied because of the use of empirical antifungal therapy or targeted antifungal therapy for other definite fungal infections at the time of positive antigenaemia. Alternatively, positive antigenaemia without sufficient evidence to diagnose proven or probable IA was considered as false-positive in any of the following: (i) no radiological abnormalities were detected on chest and/or sinus CT scans; (ii) non-specific abnormalities on CT scans improved without any antifungal treatments for IA or culture results for specimens from radiologically abnormal sites including BAL fluid or sinus aspirate were negative; or (iii) CT scans were not performed because of no evidence meeting clinical minor criteria in EORTC/MSG definitions. Positive antigenaemia recurring after the negative conversion at least 3 months apart was considered an independent episode.

Statistical analysis

Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the GM ELISA were calculated on the basis of the clinical diagnosis of proven or probable IA. The cumulative incidences of positive GM antigenaemia and IA were evaluated using Gray's method, considering death without each event as a competing risk.18 Probabilities in two groups were compared using Fisher's exact test. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Transplantation outcome

One hundred and fifty-seven allogeneic transplant recipients were included in the study. Neutrophil engraftment was obtained at a median of 17 days (9–43 days) after HSCT in 156 patients. Grade II–IV acute GVHD was observed in 69 and chronic GVHD in 87 of 134 who survived more than 100 days. Seventy patients died, the causes being haematological relapse (n = 29), infection (n = 14), non-infectious pulmonary complications (n = 15), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 6) or other reasons (n = 6).

Diagnosis of IA

Twenty-five patients developed proven (n = 8) or probable (n = 17) IA at a median of 204 days (range 21–1527 days) after HSCT, with a 1 year cumulative incidence of 12.9% (Figure 1). Twenty-two patients (88%) had pulmonary disease, two of whom showed dissemination. The remaining three had tracheobronchitis, sinusitis and gastrointestinal involvement, respectively. IA was the direct cause of death in five patients. Positive GM antigenaemia was observed in 22 patients with proven or probable IA. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 88% (22 of 25) and 79% (104 of 132), respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Cumulative incidences of IA and positive GM antigenaemia after HSCT.

 
Episodes with positive GM antigenaemia

A total of 3296 serum samples were analysed from 157 patients (mean, 21 samples/patient; range, 2–109 samples/patient). Overall, 50 patients (31.9%) developed positive GM antigenaemia at a median of 107 days (range 12–1193 days) after HSCT, with a 1 year cumulative incidence of 32.2% (Figure 1). Five patients had second positive episodes at a median interval of 358 days (range 119–1103 days) between the first and second episodes. Four positive episodes occurred in one patient.

A total of 58 positive episodes of the 50 patients were therefore analysed (Table 2). Twenty-two episodes were diagnosed true-positive based on the diagnosis of proven or probable IA. In these patients, the microbiological criterion was fulfilled with pathological findings and/or culture results in 10 and GM antigen test in 12. Seven were considered inconclusive-positive. In all the seven episodes, we could not conclude whether the abnormalities on CT scans were attributed to IA or not, because antifungal agents were administered empirically (n = 5) or for the treatment of documented candidiasis (n = 2) at the time of positive GM antigenaemia.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Incidence of false-positive GM antigenaemia

 
Twenty-nine episodes were considered false-positive, in all of which piperacillin/tazobactam or amoxicillin/clavulanate was not given at the time of positive GM antigenaemia. Penicillium and Paecilomyces were not detected in these false-positive episodes. At the time of false-positive antigenaemia, antifungal prophylaxis was given in 23 episodes (fluconazole, 20; itraconazole, 3), and no antifungal agents at all in the remaining 6. Empirical or targeted antifungal therapy was not performed in these episodes. CT scans were performed in 22 episodes, in which no radiological abnormalities were seen in 12, and non-specific abnormalities in the remaining 10 were caused by P. jirovecii infections (n = 2), bacterial infections (n = 2), pulmonary involvement of cancer (n = 1), heart failure (n = 1), bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) (n = 1) or unknown aetiology (n = 3). All three unexplained radiological abnormalities disappeared spontaneously.

Incidence and risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia

Of the 58 positive episodes, 29 satisfied the criteria of false-positive antigenaemia, with a false-positive rate of 50% (Table 2). During the first 100 days after HSCT, 15 of 24 positive episodes were considered false-positive, with a false-positive rate of 62.5% (Table 2). PPV was 33.3% or 37.5% when we included the inconclusive episode into the false-positive group or the true-positive group, respectively, in the 24 positive episodes. PPV was 55.6% or 66.7% even in nine with grade II–IV acute GVHD at the time of positive GM antigenaemia. In contrast, 14 of 34 positive episodes beyond 100 days were considered false-positive, with a rate of 41.2%, and PPV was 41.2% or 58.8%. False-positive antigenaemia occurred more frequently and therefore PPV was lower during the first 100 days.

There were no significant parameters that increased the incidence of false-positive GM antigenaemia over the entire period and during the first 100 days (Tables 3 and 4). The incidence was rather decreased in the presence of active GVHD (at any grade) and liver GVHD over the entire period, and grade II–IV GVHD, grade III–IV GVHD and liver GVHD during the first 100 days. In contrast, gastrointestinal chronic GVHD was identified as the only significant risk factor for increased false-positive GM antigenaemia beyond 100 days (Table 5). Twenty of the 30 episodes of positive GM antigenaemia without gastrointestinal chronic GVHD were true-positive, whereas all 4 positive GM antigenaemia episodes in patients with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD were false-positive (PPV 66.7% versus 0%, P = 0.02). Gastrointestinal chronic GVHD in these patients was associated with more than 500 mL of diarrhoea at the time of positive GM antigenaemia, the diagnosis of which was pathologically confirmed with colon biopsy. In thorough examinations for aspergillosis, no radiological abnormalities were seen in two patients, non-specific abnormalities on CT scan were observed but spontaneously disappeared without clinical symptoms suggestive of IA in one, and radiological findings compatible with BOOP were observed and promptly improved with systemic corticosteroids in one. There was another false-positive episode probably associated with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD, which was included in the ‘no gastrointestinal chronic GVHD’ group because GVHD was absent at the detection of positive GM antigenaemia, but gastrointestinal chronic GVHD developed soon thereafter. Among these five episodes, the GM levels became normal with the improvement of gastrointestinal chronic GVHD in four, whereas GM antigen monitoring was discontinued because of death from haematological relapse in the remaining one.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia after HSCT

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia before day 100

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia after day 100

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This study demonstrated that the sensitivity of the GM ELISA test was 88% in patient-based analysis and PPV was 38% to 50% in episode-based analysis, which were comparable with those in previous reports.36 However, false-positive GM antigenaemia frequently occurred during the first 100 days after HSCT, and PPV was lower even among patients with grade II–IV acute GVHD, in whom the pre-test probability of IA was considered to be much higher than patients without acute GVHD.

A significant correlation between the occurrence of false-positive GM antigenaemia and the presence of gastrointestinal chronic GVHD was observed in this study. GM ELISA results were false-positive in all four episodes with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD at the time of positive GM antigenaemia, and there was another false-positive episode in which GVHD was absent at the detection of positive GM antigenaemia, but gastrointestinal chronic GVHD developed soon thereafter. During these episodes, piperacillin/tazobactam or amoxicillin/clavulanate was not given, and occult infections by some fungi reacting with GM ELISA were not detected, both of which were previously reported as important risk factors for false-positive GM antigenaemia.1113 Meanwhile, our results were consistent with the conclusions of other studies that concurrent mucositis in HSCT recipients or immature intestinal mucosa in neonates allows the translocation of GM contained in foods, leading to frequent false-positive GM antigenaemia.35,810 These findings suggested the possibility that passage of dietary GM into the blood from the disrupted intestinal mucosal barrier might result in false-positive antigenaemia in patients with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD.

In contrast, the development of gastrointestinal acute GVHD was not significantly associated with the occurrence of false-positive GM antigenaemia in our series. This was probably because the overall false-positive rate during the first 100 days after HSCT was higher than that beyond 100 days. Mucosal damage due to the high-dose chemotherapy or TBI in the conditioning regimen might be the cause of frequent false-positive GM antigenaemia early after HSCT.5

Pfeiffer et al.19 recently showed the significant heterogeneity of GM test performance among patients with different prevalences of IA. They demonstrated that GM assay was more useful in immunocompromised high-risk populations such as HSCT recipients or patients with haematological malignancy than in solid-organ transplant recipients. Although emphasizing the utility of GM assay only when there is a high pre-test probability of IA, they also addressed the need for further investigations of the reasons for the heterogeneity. Prior antifungal therapy and false-positive results are possible explanations for the heterogeneity, and our findings may contribute to the effective use of the assay. However, our study is a retrospective evaluation and therefore there are some potential weaknesses. In this study, regular screening of GM antigen was not rigorously performed, but on an on-demand basis. This is in contrast to the previous studies in which GM antigenaemia was evaluated more intensively.35 This fact might have affected the diagnostic performance of this assay, but the high cost of this test precluded such intensive monitoring in daily practice. In addition, we should mention that this study might lack enough statistical power to detect the other risk factors for false-positive antigenaemia than gastrointestinal chronic GVHD because of the small number of patients with positive antigenaemia. Also, the small number of patients with positive antigenaemia precludes multivariate analysis, which might be another reason for failing to find the possible impact of the other risk factors. The other major limitation is that GM antigenaemia itself was included in the microbiological criteria, which might have precluded the evaluation of true performance of this assay. In this study, however, the number of patients diagnosed with IA falls from 22 to 10, if the GM results are excluded from the criteria, which seemed too small for the statistical analysis. Therefore, we used the original EORTC/MSG definitions that include GM antigenaemia in the microbiological criteria.

In conclusion, frequent false-positive GM antigenaemia was observed in allo-HSCT recipients during the first 100 days after transplantation or in those with gastrointestinal chronic GVHD, leading to a decreased PPV of the GM ELISA test. Therefore, GM antigenaemia results should be considered cautiously in these patients in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures including CT scans.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank all the clinicians who have assisted with the provision of data for this project.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 . Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med (2002) 347:408–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 . Stynen D, Goris A, Sarfati J, et al. A new sensitive sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect galactofuran in patients with invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol (1995) 33:497–500.[Abstract]

3 . Herbrecht R, Letscher-Bru V, Oprea C, et al. Aspergillus galactomannan detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol (2002) 20:1898–906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 . Maertens J, Verhaegen J, Lagrou K, et al. Screening for circulating galactomannan as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for invasive aspergillosis in prolonged neutropenic patients and stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective validation. Blood (2001) 97:1604–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 . Maertens J, Verhaegen J, Demuynck H, et al. Autopsy-controlled prospective evaluation of serial screening for circulating galactomannan by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for hematological patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol (1999) 37:3223–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 . Wheat LJ. Rapid diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by antigen detection. Transpl Infect Dis (2003) 5:158–66.[CrossRef][Medline]

7 . Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 34:7–14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8 . Hamaki T, Kami M, Kanda Y, et al. False-positive results of Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a patient with chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant (2001) 28:633–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9 . Ansorg R, van den Boom R, Rath PM. Detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in foods and antibiotics. Mycoses (1997) 40:353–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

10 . Murashige N, Kami M, Kishi Y, et al. False-positive results of Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for a patient with gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease taking a nutrient containing soybean protein. Clin Infect Dis (2005) 40:333–4.[Web of Science][Medline]

11 . Swanink CM, Meis JF, Rijs AJ, et al. Specificity of a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan. J Clin Microbiol (1997) 35:257–60.[Abstract]

12 . Viscoli C, Machetti M, Cappellano P, et al. False-positive galactomannan Platelia Aspergillus test results for patients receiving piperacillin–tazobactam. Clin Infect Dis (2004) 38:913–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

13 . Maertens J, Theunissen K, Verhoef G, et al. False-positive Aspergillus galactomannan antigen test results. Clin Infect Dis (2004) 39:289–90.[Web of Science][Medline]

14 . Niiya H, Kanda Y, Saito T, et al. Early full donor myeloid chimerism after reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation using a combination of fludarabine and busulfan. Hematologica (2001) 86:1071–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 . Kanda Y, Oshima K, Asano-Mori Y, et al. In vivo alemtuzumab enables haploidentical HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without ex vivo graft manipulation. Transplantation (2002) 73:568–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

16 . Kawazu M, Kanda Y, Nannya Y, et al. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic potential of real-time PCR, double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for galactomannan, and a (1->3)-β-D-glucan test in weekly screening for invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological disorders. J Clin Microbiol (2004) 42:2733–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 . Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, et al. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 34:730–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

18 . Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, et al. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med (1999) 18:695–706.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19 . Pfeiffer CD, Fine JP, Safdar N. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using a galactomannan assay: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 42:1417–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
F. Suarez, O. Lortholary, S. Buland, M. T. Rubio, D. Ghez, V. Mahe, G. Quesne, S. Poiree, A. Buzyn, B. Varet, et al.
Detection of Circulating Aspergillus fumigatus DNA by Real-Time PCR Assay of Large Serum Volumes Improves Early Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in High-Risk Adult Patients under Hematologic Surveillance
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 46(11): 3772 - 3777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/2/411    most recent
dkm463v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asano-Mori, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kurokawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asano-Mori, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kurokawa, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?