Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(3):637-639; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn236
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/3/637    most recent
dkn236v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzelepi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flemetakis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzelepi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flemetakis, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research letters

Cluster of multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to the newer cephalosporins in Northern Greece

Eva Tzelepi1,*, Maria Daniilidou2, Vivi Miriagou1, Eirini Siatravani1, Efthimia Pavlidou2 and Alexandros Flemetakis3

1 Laboratory of Bacteriology of the Hellenic Pasteur Institute, National Reference Centre for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 127 Vas. Sofias Ave., 11521 Athens, Greece 2 Laboratory of Microbiology, Venereal and Skin Diseases Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Microbiology Laboratory of the ‘Andreas Sygros’ Hospital for Skin and Venereal Diseases, Athens, Greece


* Corresponding author. Tel: +30-210-64-78-810; Fax: +30-210-64-40-171; E-mail: tzelepi{at}pasteur.gr

Keywords: gonorrhoea , therapy , STD

Sir,

Therapeutic options for gonococcal infection are nowadays limited due to the spread of gonococci resistant to a wide variety of antimicrobials. The dramatic increments in the rates of quinolone-resistant gonococci and the current shortage of spectinomycin leave the newer cephalosporins as the last safe choice among the drugs that are currently recommended as first-line treatment. Therefore, increasing reports of reduced in vitro activities of expanded-spectrum cephalosporins against Neisseria gonorrhoeae are of serious concern.15

The aim of this report from the Greek National Reference Centre for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NRCNG) is to be aware of the presence, in Northern Greece, of a cluster of multiresistant gonococci that exhibit decreased susceptibility to the newer cephalosporins.

From December 2006 through January 2008, a total of 195 gonococcal strains were submitted to the NRCNG, and all were characterized by serovar identification with the GC serotyping panel (BACTUS AE, Sweden) and tested for susceptibility to various antimicrobials using the Etest (AB Biodisk, Sweden). By analysing the results, a group of 17 isolates showed cefotaxime MICs 0.25–1 mg/L, as opposed to ≤0.002–0.125 mg/L for the remaining gonococci. By extending susceptibility testing to other cephalosporins, these isolates were found to exhibit raised MICs to cefixime and ceftriaxone also, while being highly resistant to cefuroxime and non-susceptible to cefoxitin, ceftazidime and cefepime. Cefalotin and aztreonam MIC50 values were increased up to 8-fold when compared with the ATCC 49266 strain, which was tested in parallel. This group of cephalosporin decreased susceptibility (CEDS) isolates consisted of non-penicillinase-producing, fluoroquinolone-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains with low-level resistance to penicillin G, tetracycline, erythromycin and chloramphenicol (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of 17 CEDS gonococcia

 
CEDS isolates were allocated to a distinct serovar, Bpyut, not exhibited by any other strain isolated during the study period. Additionally, all shared the same plasmid content, harbouring only the cryptic gonococcal plasmid, and showed highly similar PFGE-generated SpeI restriction patterns, 14 of them being identical. CEDS strains were also of the same origin, all submitted from the Skin and Venereal Disease Hospital located in Thessaloniki. They accounted for 63% of 27 viable gonococci that were received from this setting and represented 39% of all 43 gonorrhoea cases reported from Northern Greece during the 14 month period running from December 2006 through January 2008.

We conclude that CEDS gonococci were disseminated in Northern Greece by clonal spread of a single strain. Epidemiological data were obtained through a standard questionnaire answered by the patients, including demographic and sexual behaviour data, previous sexually transmitted disease history and area of acquisition of infection. No relation between the CEDS strains and any particular group of the population was apparent. Data were available for all CEDS strains apart from the first one isolated in December 2006. The second strain was isolated in the same month from a Spanish–English heterosexual contact, while the remaining 15 isolates were obtained after February 2008 from Greek heterosexual men who affirmed contacts with casual female partners in Thessaloniki.

Due to only slight reductions in susceptibility to cefotaxime, which is the cephalosporin regularly tested, CEDS strains passed unnoticed. As a consequence, patients were given the standard regimen used for gonorrhoea in the Venereal Hospital of Thessaloniki since 2002, which included cefuroxime sodium (single intramuscular dose of 1.5 g), plus tetracycline (100 mg twice daily for 8 days). Although therapeutic failures were not reported, the fact that the CEDS strains were subsequently found resistant to both agents does not guarantee this treatment's outcome, and this could be a cause for the persistence of these strains.

The susceptibility profile of the CEDS cluster of gonococci resembles those of N. gonorrhoeae strains with reduced susceptibility to newer β-lactams reported previously from Japan13 and elsewhere.4,5 Cephalosporin susceptibility reductions have been associated with various types of mosaic penicillin-binding protein 2, occurring via homologous recombination between penA genes of N. gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species.2,5 Most of the strains with decreased susceptibility to the newer cephalosporins reported so far, including CEDS in this study, exhibited multidrug resistance indicating the operation of non-specific mechanisms, such as alterations in penB and mtrR genetic loci. Furthermore, strains with these characteristics are most often resistant to fluoroquinolones.15 Apart from its apparent clinical impact, the uniform multiply resistant pattern of cephalosporin non-susceptible strains from distant geographical areas suggests that they may have emerged from a limited number of strains, which were subsequently disseminated worldwide.4 Nevertheless, studies on isolates separated in time and place indicated a considerable degree of heterogeneity among gonococci with these characteristics.5

For Greece, with established high rates of resistance to traditional anti-gonococcal agents and an estimated frequency of quinolone-resistant strains that reached a peak of 56% in 2007 (unpublished data of the NRCNG), the emergence of strains with diminished susceptibility to cephalosporins is threatening. From a global point of view as well, increasing reports of such non-susceptible gonococci since the 1990s is most alarming.


    Funding
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Surveillance of N. gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility continuously contacted in the NRCNG is supported by the Hellenic Pasteur Institute.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
For their contributions to gonorrhoea surveillance, we thank Helen Avgerinou (Microbiology Laboratory of the ‘Andreas Sygros’ Hospital, Athens), Olga Paniara and Athena Argyropoulou (Microbiology Laboratory of the ‘Evangelismos’ General Hospital, Athens), Evangelos Papafrangas and Maria Martsoukou (‘Sismanogleion’ General Hospital, Athens) and Alkiviadis Vatopoulos (National School for Public Health). We also thank Prof. Leonidas Tzouvelekis (Athens University Medical School) for helpful comments on the manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Muratani T, Akasaka S, Kobayashi T, et al. Outbreak of cefizopran (penicillin, oral cephems, and aztreonam)-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2001) 45:3603–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Ameyama S, Onodera S, Takahata M, et al. Mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 gene (penA) in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2002) 46:3744–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Ito M, Deguchi T, Mizutani K-S, et al. Emergence and spread of Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical isolates harboring mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 in Central Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2005) 49:137–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Lindberg R, Fredlund H, Nicholas R, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefixime ceftriaxone: association with genetic polymorphisms in penA, mtrR, porB1b and ponA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:2117–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Whiley DM, Limnios EA, Ray S, et al. Diversity of penA alterations and subtypes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains from Sydney, Australia, that are less susceptible to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:3111–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: informational supplement M100-S15 (2005) Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/3/637    most recent
dkn236v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzelepi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flemetakis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzelepi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flemetakis, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?