Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 10, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(2):428-429; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn220
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/428    most recent
dkn220v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters to the Editor

Concerns of using sialidase fusion protein as an experimental drug to combat seasonal and pandemic influenza—author's response

Hong Zhang*

Z-BioMed Inc., 15725 Crabbs Branch Way, Rockville, MD 20855, USA


* Tel: +1-301-258-8968; Fax: +1-301-260-0622; E-mail: hzhang{at}zbiomed.com

Keywords: neuraminidase , pathogenic factor , S. pneumoniae

Sir,

In my Leading article, I discussed 12 papers that studied bacterial infection.1 In their commentary on my article, Nicholls et al.2 chose to address only one of them. Studies by several groups using different animal models have demonstrated that influenza virus infection contributes significantly to secondary bacterial pneumonia and that neuraminidase activity in influenza viruses is a predictor of mortality from secondary bacterial pneumonia.36 Peltola et al.4 concluded in one of their papers ‘This action of NA also promotes adherence and invasion of Streptococcus pneumoniae, because cleavage of sialic acid from the surface of host cells exposes cryptic receptors for S. pneumoniae. Bacteria that can successfully invade the lower respiratory tract typically express NA for this purpose’.

The fact that influenza A viruses, including recent H3N2 clinical isolates, can infect desialylated cells clearly demonstrates that sialic acid-independent entry can occur,7 but this should not be misconstrued as ‘influenza virus (IFV) receptors may be different from sialic acids (SA)’.

Nicholls et al.2 provided data on sialidase treatment and bacterial adherence to address some of the concerns I raised. However, I have some specific concerns regarding this. Figure 1 in their comment has no quantification and there is a clear increase of DSA and PNA binding after DAS181 treatment. To describe each of these as a ‘modest’ increase is subjective and debatable; indeed, the MALDI-MS data are not quantitative and the relative amounts were not disclosed. The statement by Nicholls et al.2 that DAS181 treatment did not affect S. pneumoniae binding ‘over a broad range of bacterial input’ is inaccurate as their Figure 2 shows that at lower bacterial doses there was an apparent increase (P < 0.05).

I believe that the concerns raised in my original article remain and warrant further consideration and investigation to determine their ramifications.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
H. Z. has shares in Z-BioMed Inc., which is involved in the area of influenza research.


    References
 Top
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Zhang H. Concerns of using sialidase fusion protein as an experimental drug to combat seasonal and pandemic influenza. J Antimicrob Chemother (2008) 62:219–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Nicholls JM, Aschenbrenner LM, Paulson JC, et al. Comment on: Concerns of using sialidase fusion protein as an experimental drug to combat seasonal and pandemic influenza. J Antimicrob Chemother (2008) 62:426–8.[Free Full Text]

3 McCullers JA, Bartmess KC. Role of neuraminidase in lethal synergism between influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect Dis (2003) 187:1000–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

4 Peltola VT, Murti KG, McCullers JA. Influenza virus neuraminidase contributes to secondary bacterial pneumonia. J Infect Dis (2005) 192:249–57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5 LeVine AM, Koeningsknecht V, Stark JM. Decreased pulmonary clearance of S. pneumoniae following influenza A infection in mice. J Virol Methods (2001) 94:173–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6 Braun LE, Sutter DE, Eichelberger MC, et al. Co-infection of the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) with Staphylococcus aureus and influenza A virus results in synergistic disease. Microb Pathog (2007) 43:208–16.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7 Stray SJ, Cummings RD, Air GM. Influenza virus infection of desialylated cells. Glycobiology (2000) 10:649–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/428    most recent
dkn220v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?