Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 21, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(2):345-348; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn178
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/345    most recent
dkn178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bucar, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bucar, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Plant phenolic compounds as ethidium bromide efflux inhibitors in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Doris Lechner1, Simon Gibbons2 and Franz Bucar1,*

1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 4/I, A-8010 Graz, Austria 2 Centre for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK


* Corresponding author. Tel: +43-316-3805531; Fax: +43-316-3809860; E-mail: franz.bucar{at}uni-graz.at

Received 27 November 2007; returned 30 January 2008; revised 28 February 2008; accepted 1 April 2008


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Background: One-third of the world's population is infected with the dormant tuberculosis bacillus, and there have been no new antimycobacterial compounds with new modes of action for over 30 years. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis is resistant to first- and second-line drugs, which can have severe side effects, and requires the breakthrough of new antituberculotics and resistance-modifying agents. Efflux pumps can cause multidrug resistance and have recently evoked much interest as promising new targets in antimicrobial therapy.

Objectives: The study was performed to set up an ethidium bromide (EtBr) efflux assay in Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 for testing plant natural compounds as mycobacterial efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs).

Methods: After determining the MICs of the putative EPIs, they were tested for synergistic effects with EtBr prior to the efflux assay.

Results: We established an EtBr efflux assay in M. smegmatis mc2155. The isoflavone biochanin A exhibited efflux pump inhibiting activity comparable to that of verapamil. The flavone luteolin and the stilbene resveratrol were less active.

Conclusions: A new assay was established to observe the EtBr efflux in M. smegmatis and was applied to evaluate plant phenolic compounds. Our results highlighted that the isoflavonoid biochanin A exhibited better EPI activities than other flavonoids in mycobacteria.

Keywords: isoflavonoids , biochanin A , efflux pumps , mycobacteria


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Mycobacterial infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis as well as fast-growing strains are increasing globally. The additional prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis1 stimulates an urgent need for the development of new drugs for the treatment of mycobacterial infections. The mycobacterial cell wall barrier and active multidrug efflux pumps are involved in intrinsic and acquired resistance of these pathogens to many commonly used antibiotics.2 Efflux pumps can be specific for a class of antibiotics or responsible for MDR.3 They are attractive antibacterial targets, and the co-administration of an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) with an antibiotic has progressed to human clinical trials.4 Effective bacterial EPIs should decrease the intrinsic resistance of bacteria to antibiotics, reverse acquired resistance and reduce the frequency of emergence of resistant mutant strains.5 According to Stavri et al.,6 there have been no natural EPIs for mycobacteria identified so far.

Every class of the five existing families of efflux pumps is present in M. tuberculosis.2 Reserpine is an inhibitor of ATP-dependent pumps, verapamil inhibits P-glycoprotein and bacterial efflux pumps in general,2 and chlorpromazine affects potassium flux across the membrane in Staphylococcus aureus and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.7 A feature of all of these compounds is their ability to inhibit potassium transport processes.8 These inhibitors were used as reference substances to evaluate the extent of possible efflux inhibition in Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155, which expresses many putative efflux pumps.9 In this paper, we present for the first time plant natural products with inhibiting effects on ethidium bromide (EtBr) efflux of M. smegmatis mc2155.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Chemicals

EtBr (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was dissolved in water. Isoniazid (Sigma-Aldrich) and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP; Fluka/Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in DMSO (Merck Darmstadt, Germany). The following test compounds were dissolved in DMSO: Biochanin A, daidzein and formononetin (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich). Baicalin 95%, baicalein 98%, resveratrol, chlorpromazine hydrochloride, verapamil hydrochloride 98% and reserpine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Luteolin was acquired from Carl RothKG, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

M. smegmatis mc2155 ATCC 700084 (LGC Promochem, Teddington, Middlesex, UK) was used throughout the study. Bacterial cells were grown on Columbia Blood Agar (CBA; Oxoid, Basingstoke, England, UK) supplemented with 7% defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid) at 37°C under aerobic conditions for 2–3 days prior to assays. MIC and modulation assays were performed in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB; Oxoid).

DifcoTM Middlebrook 7H9 Broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Le Pont de Claix, France) supplemented with 10% BBLTM Middlebrook OADC Enrichment (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Shannon, Ireland) and 0.05% Tween 80 (for molecular biology, Sigma-Aldrich) or 0.4% DifcoTM Glycerol (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MI, USA) was used for efflux experiments.

MIC assay and modulation assay

MICs were determined as described previously.10 Briefly, a standard MIC determination of serially diluted test compounds in Ca2+- and Mg2+-adjusted MHB using bacterial inocula with a density of 5 x 105 cfu/mL was conducted. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Isoniazid was used as a positive control.

Test compounds were further screened for their synergistic effects with EtBr prior to efflux assays. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted in MHB at subinhibitory concentrations. The concentration of the modulators remained the same throughout the experiment, whereas the antibiotics were serially diluted for MIC determination with and without modulator, respectively. A ‘modulation factor’ (MF) was used to express the modulating effects of compounds on MIC (EtBr).



Formula

The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI)11 expressed the effect of the combination of antibacterial agents:



Formula



Formula



Formula

Synergism, FICI ≤ 0.5; antagonism, FICI ≥ 4.0; and no interaction, FICI > 0.5–4.0.

EtBr efflux assay

This assay was adapted for M. smegmatis mc2155 following a method by Kaatz et al.12 for inhibitors of the proton motive force driven multidrug pump NorA in S. aureus.

M. smegmatis mc2155 was cultivated on CBA under aerobic conditions at 37°C for 2–3 days, which was then used for inoculating an overnight culture13 in Tween 80-containing Middlebrook 7H9 broth. This culture was incubated overnight at 37°C, 160 rpm in sterile 50 mL centrifugal tubes and diluted 1:100 in the same medium. Large-scale cultures were grown to mid-exponential phase (OD600 ~ 0.8–1.0) at 37°C, 80 rpm for 16–24 h.

Cells were loaded with 100 µM of the proton conductor CCCP and 5 µM EtBr and further incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The inoculum was adjusted to OD600 = 0.40 (0.39–0.41) with EtBr- and CCCP-containing Middlebrook 7H9 (with OADC and Tween 80), 4 mL aliquots were spun down with 5000 g for 10 min at 20°C and the pellets were put on ice immediately. Cell pellets were resuspended in 2 mL of glycerol-containing Middlebrook 7H9. EtBr efflux from the cells was monitored at room temperature with a spectrofluorimeter (Perkin Elmer LS50B Luminescence Spectrometer) under constant stirring. The excitation and emission wavelengths used were 530 nm (slit width = 5.0 nm) and 600 nm (slit width = 10.0 nm), respectively, and readings were taken every minute for 10 min. The loss of fluorescence indicated efflux activity. The low background fluorescence of the medium was subtracted from sample and control measurements. Controls without the test compounds were carried out at the beginning and end of the assay, showing that the bacteria did not loose EtBr while stored on ice. Each concentration of the test compounds and the controls was measured at least in duplicate (active compounds at least in triplicate). Mean results were expressed as the percentage reduction of total efflux, which was observed for test strains in the absence of inhibitors for 10 min. Fluorescence levels of all controls and samples had to be within a coefficient of variation of maximal 20%.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Minimum inhibitory concentrations

The majority of the compounds exhibited weak antimycobacterial activities (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. MICs and modulation factors of compounds for M. smegmatis mc2155

 
Modulating activities

All compounds were further tested for modulating activities of EtBr at subinhibitory concentrations. Biochanin A was shown to be the best modulator and could decrease the MIC of EtBr 4- to 8-fold at 10 mg/L and 16- to 32-fold at 32 mg/L. The FICI between biochanin A and EtBr showed synergism (FICI = 0.25).11

With the exception of baicalin, formononetin, daidzein and myricetin, all tested compounds could modulate the MIC of EtBr at least to a small extent.

EtBr efflux inhibition experiments

We validated the EtBr efflux assay using reserpine, which demonstrated efflux inhibition of 91.31 ± 9.36% at 160 µM. Each known EPI tested showed efflux inhibition in M. smegmatis mc2155 cells. From all compounds tested, only biochanin A achieved inhibition levels comparable to the standard EPI controls. Luteolin and resveratrol were much less active and myricetin was inactive (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Ethidium efflux inhibition assay from M. smegmatis mc2155 cells. Standard EPIs (broken lines): chlorpromazine, bars; reserpine, filled diamonds; verapamil, filled triangles. Test compounds (continuous lines): biochanin A, filled squares; resveratrol, filled triangles; luteolin, filled circles. Values represent means ± SD, n = 2–6.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The modulation assay with EtBr as an antibiotic seems to be an appropriate pre-screening for flavonoids as EPIs. Therefore, compounds that are able to decrease the MIC of EtBr (MIC = 16 mg/L) in M. smegmatis mc2155 should be further tested in the efflux assay. This can be illustrated by comparison of biochanin A, luteolin and myricetin, which show decreasing modulation factors as well as decreasing efflux-inhibiting activities.

The modulation assay also appears to be suitable for bioassay-guided isolation for mycobacterial EPIs, for example from crude plant extracts. As we did not utilize an overexpressing strain, this might explain the quite high concentrations of EPIs to achieve efflux inhibition.

Luteolin exhibited the same antimycobacterial activity as myricetin, but stronger synergism with EtBr. This showed that the hydroxy group at C-3 as well as the number of hydroxyl groups in ring B of flavones influenced EtBr-modulating but not antimycobacterial activity.

The free hydroxyl group in ring B of daidzein slightly increased the modulating activity when compared with formononetin with a para-methoxy group in ring B. In contrast, the para-methoxy group of biochanin A strongly enhanced the modulating activity when compared with its parent compound genistein. Comparison of biochanin A and formononetin illustrated the relevance of a hydroxy group at C-5 for EtBr-modulating and efflux-inhibiting activities of isoflavones. Comparing baicalin and its aglycone baicalein showed that glycosylation of the hydroxy group at C-7 of flavones reduced antimycobacterial as well as modulating activities, respectively.

Biochanin A showed comparable efflux inhibitory effects to the reference EPIs. The isoflavone biochanin A and its metabolite genistein are potentiators of the antibacterial activities of norfloxacin and berberine in wild-type S. aureus,14 and the authors assumed an inhibiting effect on MDR pumps. Biochanin A might also reverse MDR by inhibiting the P-glycoprotein function in human breast cancer cells and was shown to increase [3H]daunomycin accumulation much more than the positive control verapamil.15 Combining our results with those of previous literature, biochanin A can override efflux mediated resistance in mammalian as well as bacterial cells.

The experiments of this study were performed on a fast-growing mycobacterial strain, and we emphasize that conclusions on the effects on M. tuberculosis should be drawn with care. However, the results obtained with the isoflavonoid biochanin A should stimulate investigations of this class of compounds as inhibitors of mycobacterial efflux pumps.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The Austrian Academy of Sciences awarded a studentship for D. L. (Doc-Fforte 22076). Financial support was provided by the Karl-Franzens-University of Graz.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
We would like to thank Dr José A. Aínsa (Grupo de Genetica de Micobacterias, Departamento de Microbiologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain) for helpful discussions. Many thanks to Professor Klaus Groschner and members of the Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacology, University of Graz for discussion and technical assistance. The Austrian Academy of Sciences is thanked for the award of a studentship for D. Lechner.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 WHO. XDR-TB Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. http://www.who.int/tb/challenges/xdr/en/index.html (9 April 2008, date last accessed).

2 De Rossi E, Ainsa JA, Riccardi G. Role of mycobacterial efflux transporters in drug resistance: an unresolved question. FEMS Microbiol Rev (2006) 30:36–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3 Cattoir V. Efflux-mediated antibiotics resistance in bacteria. Pathol Biol (Paris) (2004) 52:607–16.[Medline]

4 Lynch AS. Efflux systems in bacterial pathogens: an opportunity for therapeutic intervention? An industry view. Biochem Pharmacol (2006) 71:949–56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5 Marquez B. Bacterial efflux systems and efflux pumps inhibitors. Biochimie (2005) 87:1137–47.[Medline]

6 Stavri M, Piddock LJV, Gibbons S. Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources. J Antimicrob Chemother (2007) 59:1247–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Kaatz GW, Moudgal VV, Seo SM, et al. Phenothiazines and thioxanthenes inhibit multidrug efflux pump activity in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2003) 47:719–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Amaral L, Martins M, Viveiros M. Enhanced killing of intracellular multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by compounds that affect the activity of efflux pumps. J Antimicrob Chemother (2007) 59:1237–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Li X-Z, Zhang L, Nikaido H. Efflux pump-mediated intrinsic drug resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 48:2415–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Stavri M, Schneider R, O'Donnell G, et al. The antimycobacterial components of hops (Humulus lupulus) and their dereplication. Phytother Res (2004) 18:774–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

11 European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Terminology relating to methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Infect (2000) 6:503–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

12 Kaatz GW, Seo SM, O'Brien L, et al. Evidence for the existence of a multidrug efflux transporter distinct from NorA in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2000) 44:1404–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Parish T, Stoker NG. Electroporation of mycobacteria. Methods Mol Biol (1995) 47:237–52.[Medline]

14 Morel C, Stermitz FR, Tegos G, et al. Isoflavones as potentiators of antibacterial activity. J Agric Food Chem (2003) 51:5677–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

15 Chung SY, Sung MK, Kim NH, et al. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by natural products in human breast cancer cells. Arch Pharmacal Res (2005) 28:823–8.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/345    most recent
dkn178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bucar, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bucar, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?