Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on April 10, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(1):153-155; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn160
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/1/153    most recent
dkn160v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cateau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Imbert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cateau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Imbert, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

In vitro efficacies of caspofungin or micafungin catheter lock solutions on Candida albicans biofilm growth

Estelle Cateau*, Marie-Hélène Rodier and Christine Imbert

Université de Poitiers, UMR CNRS 6008, Equipe de Microbiologie Fondamentale et Appliquée, 6 Rue de la Milètrie, BP 199, 86034 Poitiers Cedex, France


* Corresponding author. Tel: +33-5-49-44-37-47; Fax: +33-5-49-44-39-08; E-mail: estelle.cateau{at}chu-poitiers.fr

Received 10 December 2007; returned 21 January 2008; revised 7 March 2008; accepted 17 March 2008


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: Caspofungin and micafungin belong to the echinocandins; the mechanism of action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of (1,3)-β-D-glucan synthase. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the optimal antifungal lock treatment details against a Candida albicans biofilm.

Methods: An in vitro model of a C. albicans (ATCC 3153 or ATCC 66396) biofilm associated with 100% silicone catheters was used. The effectiveness of the antifungal treatment was assayed against biofilms aged 12 h or 5 days, after exposure to caspofungin (2 mg/L) or micafungin (5 mg/L) for 12 h. The durability of the reduction in the biofilm metabolic activity was investigated (1–3 days after echinocandin treatment). The efficacy of caspofungin and micafungin was determined by evaluating a significant decrease (P < 0.0001) in the metabolic activity of biofilm yeasts.

Results: The results showed that the tested antifungal agents used as lock solution significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced the metabolic activity of C. albicans, whatever the biofilm maturation stage (12 h or 5 days old biofilms). The reduction in the metabolic activity of biofilm yeasts was maintained, even after 48 h.

Conclusions: These data suggest that caspofungin (2 mg/L) and micafungin (5 mg/L) could represent good candidates for the reduction or control of fungal biofilms associated with silicone medical devices, as part of an antifungal lock. They were able to induce a significant and persistent reduction in the yeast metabolic activity of intermediate and mature biofilms, 12 h and 5 days old, respectively, when used as catheter lock solutions.

Keywords: echinocandins , yeasts , silicone , susceptibility


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Candidaemia is frequently associated with intravascular catheter-related infection that causes increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. These infections are associated with the formation of a biofilm consisting of sessile fungi, a hyphal layer and an extracellular matrix. The fungal biofilm alters the susceptibility to antifungal agents,1 and once infected, the current clinical procedure is the removal of the catheter and the administration of systemic antifungals.2 Conservative strategy of the catheter in candidaemia, including lock and systemic therapies, could be adopted in clinically stable patients to avoid intravascular catheter replacement.3 This hypothesis proceeds from investigations carried out in the case of the evaluation of lock technique for the treatment of catheter-related bacteraemia.4 The antibiotic-lock technique involves the static instillation of a concentrated solution of antibiotic into the catheter lumen and allowing it to remain for an extended period, usually 12 h.4

Echinocandins have been recently approved for use in the treatment of candidiasis and their mechanism of action is based on the inhibition of (1,3)-β-D-glucan synthase, which is responsible for forming glucan polymers in the cell wall. The in vitro anti-biofilm activity of echinocandins has been previously demonstrated.1,57 However, the potential of echinocandins used as lock therapy is very poorly documented.

This study deals with the in vitro anti-biofilm potential of two echinocandins, caspofungin and micafungin, used as a lock solution to manage Candida albicans biofilms.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
In this study, biofilms of C. albicans strains ATCC 66396 and 3153, 12 h and 5 days old, respectively, were formed in microtitre plates, as described previously, using sections of 100% silicone catheters (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA, USA).6 The tested concentrations of caspofungin and micafungin were about 100 times MIC and so were compatible with a lock therapy strategy.4 Antifungal solutions were diluted in YNB-Glc (6.7 g of YNB, 5 g of Glc and 1 L of water). Aliquots (300 µL) of 2 mg/L caspofungin (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, USA) or 5 mg/L micafungin (Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were then added to the biofilms, and plates were incubated for 12 h at 37°C. For controls, biofilms were incubated for 12 h with 300 µL of YNB-Glc. All the silicone pieces were then moved into new wells of the plate and incubated with YNB-Glc without antifungal, at 37°C for 24, 48 or 72 h, to evaluate the persistence of the anti-biofilm activity of echinocandins.

Echinocandin effects were monitored by a previously described metabolic assay based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt (XTT).6,8 Briefly, each catheter section coated with biofilm and treated or not with antifungal was incubated for 3 h at 37°C with XTT (300 mg/L) and menadione (0.13 mM) in 150 µL of PBS. Absorbance was then measured at 492 nm (microplate reader LP400, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) and correlated with the yeast metabolic activity within the biofilm. All experiments were performed twice with eight replicates. An analysis of variance and a Scheffe's test were conducted to determine the statistical differences between groups.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The biofilm growth inhibition observed after such a lock treatment was represented on a bar chart showing the percentage of biofilm inhibition induced by the antifungal function of the time of incubation after the end of the treatment for each type of biofilm: intermediate phase (12 h) or maturation phase (5 days).

For the strain C. albicans 3153, for a young biofilm (12 h), the growth inhibition induced by a 12 h lock therapy and observed after a 24 h culture without antifungal was ~91% (control: A492 = 0.54 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.050) for 2 mg/L caspofungin and ~67% (micafungin: A492 = 0.180) for 5 mg/L micafungin (Figure 1a). For strain 66396, the results observed were, respectively, ~70% (control: A492 = 0.606 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.182) for caspofungin and ~92% (micafungin: A492 = 0.050) for micafungin (Figure 1b). These results showed that caspofungin and micafungin used in our experimental conditions demonstrated an inhibitory activity of ~70% on a 12 h old biofilm development, 24 h after the lock therapy, for the two studied strains. Furthermore, this anti-biofilm efficacy was maintained after the end of the lock, suggesting a persistence of the activity. To confirm and investigate this persistence, the 12 h old biofilm (strain 3153 or 66396) growth inhibition was also evaluated 48 or 72 h after the end of each echinocandin lock.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Biofilm growth inhibition (CA 3153) observed after the end of a 12 h antifungal treatment. The catheter was incubated with YNB-Glc without antifungal for 24, 48 or 72 h after the lock therapy. (a) C. albicans ATCC 3153 biofilm and (b) C. albicans ATCC 66396 biofilm. For these bar charts the results obtained were significantly different from the controls (P < 0.0001; Scheffe's test). CAS, caspofungin; MICAF, micafungin.

 
For the 3153 strain, even 48 h after the end of the lock, caspofungin and micafungin demonstrated a significant activity on the development of a 12 h old biofilm, ranging from 54% (micafungin) to 85% (caspofungin), as shown by absorbance values: control: A492 = 0.536; caspofungin: A492 = 0.082 and micafungin: A492 = 0.245 (Figure 1a). Whereas 72 h after the end of the lock, the inhibition observed was ~40% with caspofungin or micafungin (control: A492 = 0.517; caspofungin: A492 = 0.312 and micafungin: A492 = 0.309; Figure 1a).

For the 66396 strain, the anti-biofilm activity also seemed to be maintained. Our investigations have shown that 48 h after the end of the treatment, the observed growth inhibition was ~60% with caspofungin (control: A492 = 0.735 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.292) and 93% with micafungin (micafungin: A492 = 0.054). Three days after the end of the antifungal contact, the inhibition percentages were ~57% and 52%, respectively, control: A492 = 0.670; caspofungin: A492 = 0.286 and micafungin: A492 = 0.319 (Figure 1b).

In conclusion, these results confirmed that the anti-biofilm activity of the two echinocandins on intermediate C. albicans biofilms is persistent, even if 72 h post-lock, the inhibition seemed to decrease: echinocandin locks did not manage to induce more than a reduction by half of the metabolic activity of the biofilms 72 h after the end of the antifungal contact.

In the second part of this work, we investigated the efficiency of these locks on the development of a mature C. albicans biofilm, i.e. 5 days old. The activity persistence was tested 24 or 48 h after the end of each lock. The persistence 72 h after the treatment was not evaluated because we hypothesized that the activity decrease observed with an intermediate biofilm would have been intensified on older biofilms.

On a 5-day-old C. albicans 3153 biofilm, the inhibition observed 24 h after the end of the lock was ~87% for caspofungin (control: A492 = 0.608 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.079) and 58% for micafungin (micafungin: A492 = 0.230) (Figure 1a). For the 66396 strain, in the same conditions, the inhibition was 90% for caspofungin (control: A492 = 0.667 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.067) and 89% for micafungin (micafungin: A492 = 0.075) (Figure 1b). Therefore, the anti-biofilm activity described for the intermediate biofilm treated by the studied echinocandins used as lock solutions was verified on older biofilms whatever the studied strain.

The results obtained from these mature biofilms 48 h after the end of the contact corroborated the hypothesis that the activity of echinocandins used as lock solutions was persistent. For the 3153 strain, the inhibition was 88% for caspofungin (control: A492 = 0.617 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.073) and 54% for micafungin (micafungin: A492 = 0.283) (Figure 1a). For C. albicans 66396, the observed inhibition was 47% for caspofungin (control: A492 = 0.693 and caspofungin: A492 = 0.366) and 91% for micafungin (micafungin: A492 = 0.059) (Figure 1b).

Conclusions

Our results underlined the in vitro ability of lock solutions to reduce the metabolic activity of a C. albicans biofilm, whatever the echinocandin used and whatever the biofilm maturation stage, within the limits of the experimental conditions of this study. In addition, our results showed no acquisition of resistance, suggesting that echinocandins could be of interest in the management of candidiasis associated with catheters. Our results agreed with previous investigations that had already shown that caspofungin and aminocandin, another echinocandin, were capable of anti-adherent and anti-biofilm activity.6,9 These experiments were different from the presented lock methodology because the metabolic activity of the biofilm was evaluated as soon as the antimicrobial treatment was over.

In conclusion, our results showed that in vitro, caspofungin and micafungin managed at least to reduce by half the metabolic activity of C. albicans growing as a biofilm. However, all results corroborated the hypothesis that echinocandins would have a real anti-biofilm potential and could become important factors in the lock approach. The tested concentrations corresponded to the lowest concentrations that can be used as a lock strategy, if we consider antibiotic lock therapy data.4 The use of higher echinocandin concentrations could be considered, but Melo et al.10 have recently described an in vitro paradoxical effect using supra-MIC concentrations of caspofungin, suggesting that experimental conditions have to be monitored carefully. Our study suggests that the lock therapy strategy could be extended to fungal infections.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This study was supported by internal funding.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
We wish to thank Astellas and Merck Laboratories for supporting this work by providing standard antifungal powders of micafungin and caspofungin, respectively.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Tortorano AM, Biraghi E, Astolfi A, et al. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective survey of candidaemia: report from one Italian region. J Hosp Infect (2002) 51:297–304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis (2001) 32:1249–72.[CrossRef][Medline]

3 Gallien S, Sordet F, Enache-Angoulvant A. Treatment of catheter-related candidemia. J Mycol Med (2007) 17:42–9.

4 Carratala J. The antibiotic-lock technique for therapy of ‘highly needed’ infected catheters. Clin Microbiol Infect (2002) 8:282–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5 Choi HW, Shin JH, Jung SI, et al. Species-specific differences in the susceptibilities of biofilms formed by Candida bloodstream isolates to echinocandin antifungals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:1520–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Cocuaud C, Rodier MH, Daniault G, et al. Anti-metabolic activity of caspofungin against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother (2005) 56:507–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Seidler M, Salvenmoser S, Muller FM. In vitro effects of micafungin against Candida biofilms on polystyrene and central venous catheter sections. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2006) 28:568–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8 Soustre J, Rodier MH, Imbert-Bouyer S, et al. Caspofungin modulates in vitro adherence of Candida albicans to plastic coated with extracellular matrix proteins. J Antimicrob Chemother (2004) 53:522–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Cateau E, Levasseur P, Borgonovi M, et al. The effect of aminocandin (HMR 3270) on the in-vitro adherence of Candida albicans to polystyrene surfaces coated with extracellular matrix proteins or fibronectin. Clin Microbiol Infect (2007) 13:311–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 Melo AS, Colombo AL, Arthington-Skaggs BA. Paradoxical growth effect of caspofungin observed on biofilms and planktonic cells of five different Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2007) 51:3081–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. A. G. Ferreira, J. H. Carr, C. E. F. Starling, M. A. de Resende, and R. M. Donlan
Biofilm Formation and Effect of Caspofungin on Biofilm Structure of Candida Species Bloodstream Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4377 - 4384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. L. Lazzell, A. K. Chaturvedi, C. G. Pierce, D. Prasad, P. Uppuluri, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot
Treatment and prevention of Candida albicans biofilms with caspofungin in a novel central venous catheter murine model of candidiasis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(3): 567 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. P. Pai
Antifungal Combinations against Simulated Candida albicans Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2009; 53(6): 2629 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. J. Jacobson, K. E. Steckelberg, K. E. Piper, J. M. Steckelberg, and R. Patel
In Vitro Activity of Micafungin against Planktonic and Sessile Candida albicans Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2009; 53(6): 2638 - 2639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. M Bland and S. Thomas
Micafungin plus Fluconazole in an Infected Knee with Retained Hardware due to Candida albicans
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2009; 43(3): 528 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/1/153    most recent
dkn160v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cateau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Imbert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cateau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Imbert, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?