Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 15, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 61(6):1394-1396; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn105
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/6/1394    most recent
dkn105v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hidron, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hidron, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research letters

Daptomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis prosthetic valve endocarditis

Alicia I. Hidron1, Audrey N. Schuetz2, Frederick S. Nolte3, Carolyn V. Gould1,4 and Melissa K. Osborn1,*

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA 3 Pathology and Lab Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA


* Correspondence address. 550 Peachtree St NE, 7th Floor Medical Office Tower, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA. Tel: +1-404-686-8114; Fax: +1-404-686-4841; E-mail: mkosbor{at}emory.edu

Keywords: emerging resistance , treatment failure , non-susceptible

Sir,

Daptomycin resistance is unusual. We report a case of clinical and bacteriological failure in a patient with Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis treated with daptomycin and review available data on daptomycin resistance.

A 53-year-old male was hospitalized for native mitral valve endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Treatments with nafcillin and then vancomycin were discontinued due to a severe rash with both agents. Daptomycin was initiated followed by mitral valve replacement. The patient had a complicated, 2 month hospital course during which he developed a stage IV decubitus ulcer colonized with vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. He completed 8 weeks of daptomycin at 6 mg/kg/day.

One month after discharge, the patient was diagnosed with prosthetic mitral valve endocarditis caused by vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. A transoesophageal echocardiogram showed multiple vegetations on the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Owing to penicillin allergy, treatment with daptomycin was initiated.

Blood cultures on day 1 grew three different strains of E. faecalis, including a vancomycin-resistant daptomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC >512 and 4 mg/L, respectively), a vancomycin-susceptible daptomycin-non-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC 2 and >8 mg/L, respectively), and a vancomycin-resistant daptomycin-non-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC >512 and >8 mg/L, respectively). Susceptibility testing was performed using MicroScan broth microdilution (Dade Behring Inc., West Sacramento, CA, USA). Daptomycin MICs were performed using Etest strips (AB Biodisk North America Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA) on Mueller–Hinton plates and were confirmed at the CDC. Daptomycin susceptibility methods were supplemented with additional calcium, as recommended by the CLSI.1

Blood cultures on hospital days 2 and 4 again grew vancomycin-resistant, daptomycin-non-susceptible E. faecalis. Penicillin desensitization was attempted unsuccessfully. Linezolid was started on hospital day 7 and blood cultures cleared on day 9. Because he had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, repeat valve replacement presented a high risk of stroke while on cardiac bypass. The patient therefore elected medical management. He was discharged on hospital day 16 on oral linezolid therapy for palliation. Ten days after discharge, bacteraemia returned. He elected hospice care and expired shortly thereafter.

Antibacterial agents with activity against emerging multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens are limited. Daptomycin is a novel cyclic lipopeptide that binds the cell membrane in a calcium-dependent fashion causing depolarization and release of intracellular ions with arrest in macromolecular synthesis and cell death.2 It is bactericidal against both susceptible and resistant Gram-positive organisms and has a low toxicity profile.2 However, it is not approved for use in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infections. Little is known about the potential emergence of daptomycin resistance among these species and there are no defined MIC breakpoints for a resistant category for Enterococcus according to the USA-FDA and CLSI.

Case reports of clinical failures with daptomycin in S. aureus infections emerged shortly after approval.3 However, resistance among Enterococcus species has been reported in only seven published cases (Table 1).410 Currently, there are no studies on mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in enterococcal species. For S. aureus, changes in membrane structure and function correlate with in vivo development of daptomycin non-susceptibility,11,12 and mutations in proteins involved in cell permeability have been implicated in daptomycin MIC increases.13 Daptomycin, a large molecule, may get trapped in the cell wall, unable to bind its target in the cell membrane. Supporting this hypothesis, elevated daptomycin MICs have been found to correlate with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin in >90% of the S. aureus isolates,14 and the level of resistance for both drugs has been found to correlate positively with cell wall thickness in glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus isolates.15


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Daptomycin non-susceptible Enterococcus species isolates: case reports

 
More recently, emergence of daptomycin heteroresistance was demonstrated for a vancomycin-heteroresistant E. faecium after exposure to vancomycin, suggesting the same underlying resistance mechanism.16 During therapy with daptomycin for S. aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis, 16% of the patients failed with a persistent or relapsing infection with increasing isolate MICs. Most of these failures were in deep-seated infections for which a necessary surgical intervention was not performed.17 In the case of Enterococcus, either a chronic indwelling line or persistent focus of infection was reported for all but two of the seven reported cases of daptomycin clinical treatment failures, and non-susceptibility developed on treatment after an average of 19 days.410

The mechanisms of non-susceptibility to daptomycin are thus diverse and not completely understood. Increasing MICs in the setting of pre-exposure to either vancomycin or daptomycin and/or evidence of a persistent focus of infection seem to be a frequent occurrence for clinical failures among both S. aureus and Enterococcus species. Despite lack of experimental data, it is plausible that the mechanisms that explain enterococcal non-susceptibility parallel those for S. aureus. The use of daptomycin in patients with prior prolonged vancomycin or daptomycin therapy, or with a focus of infection that cannot be removed, should be undertaken with caution, as clinical failure can occur.


    Funding
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
No specific funding was received for this study.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    References
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically—Seventh Edition: Approved Standard M7-A7 (2006) Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.

2 Steenbergen JN, Alder J, Thorne GM, et al. Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother (2005) 55:283–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Mangili A, Bica I, Snydman DR, et al. Daptomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis (2005) 40:1058–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

4 Munoz-Price LS, Lolans K, Quinn JP. Emergence of resistance to daptomycin during treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis infection. Clin Infect Dis (2005) 41:565–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5 Long JK, Choueiri TK, Hall GS, et al. Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc (2005) 80:1215–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Green MR, Anasetti C, Sandin RL, et al. Development of daptomycin resistance in a bone marrow transplant patient with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus durans. J Oncol Pharm Pract (2006) 12:179–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Lewis JS II, Owens A, Cadena J, et al. Emergence of daptomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium during daptomycin therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2005) 49:1664–5.[Free Full Text]

8 Kanafani ZA, Federspiel JJ, Fowler VG Jr. Infective endocarditis caused by daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: a case report. Scand J Infect Dis (2007) 39:75–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9 Lesho EP, Wortmann GW, Craft D, et al. De novo daptomycin nonsusceptibility in a clinical isolate. J Clin Microbiol (2006) 44:673.[Free Full Text]

10 Fraher MH, Corcoran GD, Creagh S, et al. Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a patient with no prior exposure to daptomycin. J Hosp Infect (2007) 65:376–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

11 Critchley IA, Blosser-Middleton RS, Jones ME, et al. Baseline study to determine in vitro activities of daptomycin against Gram-positive pathogens isolated in the United States in 2000–2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2003) 47:1689–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Silverman JA, Oliver N, Andrew T, et al. Resistance studies with daptomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2001) 45:1799–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Friedman L, Alder JD, Silverman JA. Genetic changes that correlate with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2006) 50:2137–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Patel JB, Jevitt LA, Hageman J, et al. An association between reduced susceptibility to daptomycin and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 42:1652–3.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

15 Cui L, Tominaga E, Neoh HM, et al. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2006) 50:1079–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Arias CA, Torres HA, Singh KV, et al. Failure of daptomycin monotherapy for endocarditis caused by an Enterococcus faecium strain with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible subpopulations and evidence of in vivo loss of the vanA gene cluster. Clin Infect Dis (2007) 45:1343–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17 Fowler VG Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, et al. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med (2006) 355:653–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. E. Warren
Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii25 - iii33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Future directions with daptomycin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii41 - iii49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/6/1394    most recent
dkn105v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hidron, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hidron, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?