Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on January 31, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 61(3):751-753; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn004
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/751    most recent
dkn004v2
dkn004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flamm, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flamm, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research letters

Activity of doripenem and comparator β-lactams against US clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with defined mutations in the penicillin-binding domains of pbp1a, pbp2b and pbp2x

Todd A. Davies*, Wenchi Shang, Karen Bush and Robert K. Flamm

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C., Raritan, NJ, USA


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-908-707-3465; Fax: +1-908-707-3501; E-mail: tdavies{at}prdus.jnj.com

Keywords: carbapenems , PBPs , binding affinity

Sir,

Doripenem, a parenteral carbapenem, was recently approved in the USA for the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) including pyelonephritis. In Europe, a marketing authorization application has been filed for the treatment of cIAIs, cUTIs and nosocomial pneumonia. Doripenem has a broad spectrum of activity against clinically important pathogens including Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative non-fermenters, anaerobes and many Gram-positive cocci such as methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp., group A streptococci and pneumococci.1

β-Lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is caused by mutations in the penicillin-binding domains of one or more of its six penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) resulting from mosaic genes or point mutations.2,3 Altered PBP1a, PBP2b and PBP2x are most important for β-lactam resistance in clinical isolates.2,3

This study reports the activity of doripenem against 30 S. pneumoniae US clinical isolates. β-Lactam MICs were determined using panels from Trek Diagnostic Systems (Cleveland, OH, USA) using CLSI recommendations.4 Breakpoints (non-meningitis) for all drugs except doripenem were those approved by CLSI.5 Currently, there are no approved doripenem breakpoints for S. pneumoniae. PBP gene sequencing and competition assays were performed as described previously.6

Seven penicillin-susceptible isolates had β-lactam MICs ≤0.03 mg/L (genotype wild-type) (Table 1). These isolates had no mutations in the penicillin-binding motifs of pbp1a, pbp2b and pbp2x. Of the eight penicillin-intermediate isolates (genotypes 1 and 2), three had penicillin MICs of 0.12 mg/L and MICs for the other β-lactams were ≤0.12 mg/L (genotypes 1A and 1B) (Table 1). They had a T446A substitution in the PBP2b SSNT motif; one isolate (genotype 1B) also had PBP2x substitutions (T338A and R384G). Five penicillin-intermediate isolates with penicillin MICs of 1 mg/L additionally had PBP2x substitutions of I371T and L546V (genotype 2, Table 1). The carbapenem MICs were the lowest of the agents tested, with imipenem having 2- and 4-fold lower MICs than doripenem and meropenem, respectively (genotype 2A). One isolate (genotype 2B) had substitutions of T371S in PBP1a and D623G in PBP2b. These substitutions were associated with 2–4-fold increases in carbapenem MICs (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Doripenem and comparator β-lactam MICs and PBP affinities in S. pneumoniae clinical isolates with defined PBP mutations

 
Among the penicillin-resistant isolates (genotypes 3–5), seven had penicillin MICs of 2–4 mg/L and were non-susceptible to imipenem and meropenem, three were non-susceptible to ceftriaxone and one was non-susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; doripenem MICs were 0.5–1 mg/L (Table 1). These seven isolates (genotype 3) had PBP1a substitutions of T371A and P432T in addition to the PBP2x and PBP2b changes mentioned previously (Table 1).

Two isolates with genotype 4 had additional substitutions of A619G and D623G in or near the KTGTA motif of PBP2b and a substitution of T371S in the STMK motif of PBP1a (Table 1). These changes corresponded with increased penicillin MICs (8 mg/L) and resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem and meropenem (Table 1). Doripenem MICs were 1–2 mg/L.

Six isolates with genotype 5 had the same PBP substitutions as genotype 4 isolates, with the addition of the M339F change in PBP2x; in four isolates (genotypes 5A, 5B and 5C), there was also a Y595F substitution (Table 1). These changes were associated with a 2–16-fold increase in ceftriaxone MICs leading to resistance, whereas the MICs of the other drugs were within one doubling dilution when compared with genotype 4 isolates (Table 1).

PBP binding studies with a wild-type isolate indicated that the carbapenems had good affinity for all six PBPs with IC50s ≤0.06 mg/L (Table 1). Ceftriaxone bound tightly to all PBPs (IC50s ≤ 0.1 mg/L) except PBP2b (Table 1) as expected, as cephalosporins do not use PBP2b as a primary target.2 In a genotype 5C isolate, the carbapenem binding affinities for all PBPs were reduced: PBP2b and PBP2x had the highest increase in IC50s (2–4 and 3.7–8 mg/L, respectively) (Table 1). The ceftriaxone IC50 for PBP2x was increased at least 200-fold when compared with strain 8865 (Table 1).

β-Lactam MIC increases correlated with increases in the number of PBP1a, 2x and 2b substitutions. In this study, the PBP1a, 2b and 2x substitutions found in, and adjacent to, the penicillin-binding motifs SXXK, SXN and KT/SG were similar to substitutions reported by others.2,3 Carbapenems, like penicillins, are thought to have PBP2b as their primary target.3 In a study examining clinical isolates from Japan, a T624G PBP2b substitution was associated with carbapenem resistance.3 No isolates in our study had this mutation; however, a substitution at the adjacent amino acid (D623G) was found in seven of the eight genotype 4 and 5 isolates, all of which had elevated β-lactam MICs. This substitution was reported in a β-lactam-resistant S. pneumoniae recombinant that resulted from transformation with DNA from a β-lactam-resistant Streptococcus mitis strain.2

In summary, doripenem and imipenem (MIC90 1 mg/L) were 2-fold more active than meropenem (MIC90 2 mg/L) against the pneumococcal isolates in this study, including ceftriaxone-resistant isolates. The carbapenems had high affinity for all PBPs in a penicillin-susceptible isolate but had reduced binding affinity, particularly to PBP2x and PBP2b, in a penicillin-resistant isolate.


    Funding
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This work was supported by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
T. A. D., W. S., K. B. and R. K. F. own shares in Johnson & Johnson and are employees of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C.


    Acknowledgements
 
This work was presented in part at the Forty-sixth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 2006 (Abstract C1-38).


    References
 Top
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ, et al. Doripenem (S-4661), a novel carbapenem: comparative activity against contemporary pathogens including bactericidal action and preliminary in vitro methods evaluations. J Antimicrob Chemother (2004) 54:144–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Hakenbeck R, Konig A, Kern I, et al. Acquisition of five high-Mr penicillin-binding protein variants during transfer of high-level β-lactam resistance from Streptococcus mitis to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol (1998) 180:1831–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Sanbongi Y, Ida T, Ishikawa M, et al. Complete sequences of six penicillin-binding protein genes from 40 Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates collected in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 48:2244–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically—Seventh Edition: Approved Standard M7-A7 (2006) Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.

5 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Seventeenth Informational Supplement M100-S17 (2006) Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.

6 Davies TA, Shang W, Bush K. Activities of ceftobiprole and other β-lactams against Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates from the United States with defined substitutions in penicillin-binding proteins PBP 1a, PBP 2b, and PBP 2x. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2006) 50:2530–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Yamada, T. Watanabe, N. Baba, Y. Takeuchi, F. Ohsawa, and S. Gomi
Crystal Structures of Biapenem and Tebipenem Complexed with Penicillin-Binding Proteins 2X and 1A from Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2008; 52(6): 2053 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/751    most recent
dkn004v2
dkn004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flamm, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flamm, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?