Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 60(5):1080-1084; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm328
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/5/1080    most recent
dkm328v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Efficacy of posaconazole and amphotericin B in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in dexamethasone immunosuppressed rats

Andrew J. Ullmann1,*, Erik Krammes1, Sita Sommer1, Ines Buschmann1, Bernhard Jahn-Muehl2, Anthony Cacciapuoti3 and Heinz-Josef Schmitt4

1 3rd Medical Department, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany 2 Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany 3 Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ, USA 4 Paediatric Department, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany


* Corresponding author. Tel / Fax: +49-6131-17-6564; E-mail: ullmann{at}uni-mainz.de

Received 8 May 2007; returned 27 June 2007; revised 6 July 2007; accepted 25 July 2007


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is associated with high mortality. To assess new antifungal therapy options, animal models have to be developed to assess, in an appropriate setting, the activity of new drugs.

Methods: Male albino CD rats (125–150 g) were fed with a protein-free diet and received dexamethasone thrice weekly subcutaneously during the whole experiment. After 2 weeks, an inoculum of 106 conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus (H11-20) was injected intratracheally. Antifungal treatment was initiated and continued for a total of 7 days. Animals were grouped in numbers of 10. One group of animals served as untreated control, whereas the others were treated with amphotericin B intraperitoneally (2 and 4 mg/kg) and posaconazole via gavage (2, 4, 10 and 20 mg/kg). Survival and log10 cfu/g of the lungs were the endpoints. The strain H11-20 was tested for susceptibility in vitro to amphotericin B and posaconazole, respectively. Fungal burden of the lungs was expressed as log10 cfu/g. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences in fungal burden were assessed by the Mann–Whitney test.

Results: All untreated animals died within a week. Amphotericin B and posaconazole at 2 mg/kg demonstrated survival benefits over control (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04). Dosages of 4 mg/kg were superior to 2 mg/kg for amphotericin B (P = 0.02) and posaconazole (P < 0.05), respectively. No further survival benefits were demonstrated beyond dosages of 10 mg/kg. Rats treated with 20 mg/kg posaconazole, however, had a lower fungal burden than all the other treatment groups (P = 0.0002).

Conclusions: Posaconazole and amphotericin B are effective in a dosage-dependent manner in this pulmonary aspergillosis model in immunocompromised rats.

Keywords: animal models , Aspergillus fumigatus , azoles , polyenes


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is associated with a high mortality rate in humans.1,2 No reliable in vitro testing is available that could make predictions on the efficacy of various therapy options in humans and breakpoints are not yet identified especially for newer antifungal agents. Due to these limitations, animal models must be developed to assess the activity of these drugs in appropriate disease and host settings. Frequently antifungal agents are evaluated in disseminated fungal diseases of animal models.

Therefore, animal models are crucial for the preclinical evaluation of new antifungal agents. Further, the advantages of animal models are their potential for pharmacological and biological evaluation. Additionally, different disease models are accessible.

Posaconazole is an extended-spectrum triazole that demonstrates a broad in vitro antifungal spectrum. Posaconazole has shown in vitro, in vivo and clinical activity against various fungal pathogens, including Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Coccidioides immitis, Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, zygomycetes and Fusarium.35 Amphotericin B has broad activity against numerous fungi, however, its clinical use is frequently limited by an unfavourable safety profile, most notably dose-limiting nephrotoxicity in humans.6,7

An animal model with continuously immunocompromised rats was established to study antifungal agents (posaconazole and amphotericin B) in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The original model consisted of Sprague–Dawley rats which were treated with cortisone acetate, infected intratracheally with 106 conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus and followed daily for survival.8 A modification of this model was used, since in our hands, not all rats became ill within the preset time of 7 days when the original dosage of cortisone acetate was administered.

Preparation of inocula

A. fumigatus, strain H11-20, was used for the experiments. H11-20 was isolated from a rat dying of spontaneously acquired pulmonary aspergillosis while on steroid treatment.9 The isolate was incubated on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates at 35°C for 4–5 days to form conidia. The conidia were harvested in 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 in saline and filtered through several layers of sterile gauze. Conidia were counted with a haemocytometer. The final suspension was diluted in normal saline to a concentration of 107 conidia/mL. The conidial suspension was used within 24 h and stored until application at 4°C.

Rats

Male albino CD rats (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany; 125–150 g) received doxycycline (200 mg dissolved in 750 mL of drinking water) ad libitum for the entire duration of the experiment. All animals were housed in groups of three rats per cage. Cages were inspected daily during the entire experiment. This animal experiment had an approval by the local authorities and was in accordance with laws for animal housing and care.

Immunosuppression

Rats were fed a protein-free diet and additionally given 12 mg/kg dexamethasone subcutaneously three times weekly during the whole experiment. After 2 weeks of this pretreatment, the rats were infected with A. fumigatus (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Scheme of the immunocompromised rat model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

 
Infection

Rats were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine. The trachea was revealed by surgery. The appropriate number of conidia in a volume of 0.1 mL of normal saline was slowly administered into the trachea by a 27 gauge needle with a syringe. Rats had fully recovered within 1 h of the procedure, and no deaths resulted from the inoculation procedure. Antifungal treatment was initiated within 1 h after infection and continued for 7 days. Ten rats were in each group; one untreated group served as a control. Rats appearing moribund or surviving 2 weeks after the end of treatment were sacrificed.

Antifungal treatment

Posaconazole (Noxafil®; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) was made available by Schering-Plough. The suspension had a concentration of 40 mg/mL and is stable at room temperature. The suspension was diluted in sterile water to a concentration of 1 mg/mL and was stored at room temperature in the dark until use. Posaconazole was administered at doses of 2, 4, 10 and 20 mg/kg via gavage. Amphotericin B was purchased as the sodium deoxycholate formulation (Bristol–Myers Squibb, Germany) and was dissolved in 5% dextrose to produce a stock solution of 5 mg/mL. The drug stock was diluted in sterile water to produce the required concentration of 1 mg/mL. The stock solution was stored at 4°C in the dark. Amphotericin B was administered at doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally. All dilutions were newly prepared for each experimental therapy cycle (1 week).

Fungal cultures

The main organ of interest for this experiment was the lung. Organs used for fungal culture were removed using a sterile technique and mechanically homogenized in sterile saline. Homogenates were further diluted in normal saline and quantitatively cultured for 48 h on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates at 35°C. Colonies visible on plates were counted to calculate the remaining fungal burden of the lung. Plates without any visible colonies were kept for an additional 5 days before they were discarded. Fungal burden was expressed as log10 cfu/g of lung tissue.

Susceptibility testing

Portions of 0.1 mL of each spore suspension were added to microdilution tray wells that contained no drug (control wells) or amphotericin B. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 h. The lowest concentration of test drug that prevented visible growth was considered the MIC. Strain H11-20 was tested at least twice against amphotericin B on at least 2 days. Distinct endpoints for amphotericin B were visible after 48 h of incubation.10 An Etest® (AB Biodisk, Solana, Sweden) was used for testing susceptibility to posaconazole. This test was utilized due to its easier procedure and was performed twice. The Etest is considered consistent with the standard testing by CLSI.11

Statistical analysis

Survival was evaluated by log-rank analysis and compared pairwise by the Log-Rank test. Tissue fungal burden results were compared by non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were performed with GraphPad Prism Version 5.0.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
MICs of amphotericin B and posaconazole for A. fumigatus strain H11-20 were 0.4 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively. All untreated and infected animals died within 1 week. The median survival time (days) after infection for the treated groups was longer compared with the untreated control group (Figure 2). Amphotericin B and posaconazole both administered at 2 mg/kg demonstrated survival benefits over controls (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively); 4 mg/kg amphotericin B or posaconazole was superior to 2 mg/kg of the same drug (P = 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively; Log-Rank). No further survival benefit was demonstrated beyond 10 mg/kg posaconazole.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Survival curves comparing various groups of immunocompromised rats treated with (a) amphotericin B or (b) posaconazole. Ordinate indicates survival probabilities. P values by Log-Rank test.

 
Rats receiving 20 mg/kg posaconazole had a lower fungal burden than all other treatment groups (control versus 20 mg/kg posaconazole: P = 0.0002; Mann–Whitney test) (Figure 3). All other groups showed no significant difference compared with the control group with regard to fungal burden of the lung. No disseminated disease of aspergillosis was seen in this model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (Figure 4).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Fungal burden (A. fumigatus) of the lung at the death of the immunocompromised rats of different treatment groups and the control group (P values by Mann–Whitney test).

 


Figure 4
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Histopathology of different organs of interest indicating the non-dissemination of fungal disease. Periodic acid-Schiff staining of lung tissue (a), spleen (b), kidney (c) and liver (d). Only in the lung are hyphae detectable; indicated by the arrow.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This study developed a rat animal model of non-disseminated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in a non-neutropenic immunosuppressed state. The purpose of this model was to mimic invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, which is the most frequent manifestation of invasive aspergillosis in humans.

The majority of murine and rodent models for invasive aspergillosis use neutropenia and disseminated disease, which seldom occurs in humans as compared with invasive pulmonary disease. These animal models were usually developed to study the activity of antifungal drugs.12,13 So far there is no consensus on which model can be used ideally. Nevertheless, risk factors for invasive aspergillosis have been identified in various host groups including allogeneic stem cell recipients. Such risk factors for this specific risk group are prolonged neutropenia, graft failure, graft versus host disease and steroid exposure.14,15 This animal model was intended to mimic the immune state caused by steroid therapy in such patients. Dexamethasone was chosen since the corticosteroid potency is the highest. Important to that matter was the continuous immunosuppression with steroids since their withdrawal would allow the immune system to rapidly recover.16

The intratracheal model used in this study provided a fixed spore count to each animal, in contrast to the application of conidia by intranasal aspiration which may be unreliable, or by use of inhalation chambers which have the disadvantage of possible differences in the quantity of conidia inhaled, due to variations in the respiratory rates of the animals. The invasiveness of the intratracheal procedure was well tolerated and no procedural deaths occurred.

Formal pharmacokinetic analyses were not performed in this study, but those results have been reported previously and were used for the treatment range in our model.17 Both posaconazole and amphotericin B do not immediately achieve high and effective tissue levels allowing immediate application of the agents within the hour of conidia application. The results from this animal model confirmed previously published results with posaconazole but in a different immunocompromised setting and disease model.1821 In our study, posaconazole at the highest dosage tested was able to nearly sterilize the lungs of most rats from A. fumigatus. The non-significant difference in survival rate might be attributable to the low numbers of animals in the group (underpowered study). The comparison of the fungal load in the lower dosage range might be misleading since no fixed time point was set for organ removal.

This model of experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompromised outbred rats mimicked an immune situation similar to that of patients treated with corticosteroids. Infection without therapy resulted in death within 7 days. Pulmonary infection did not spread to other organs, although this was not studied thoroughly (data not shown). This model could be useful to study disease mechanism and various different therapeutic options. Posaconazole and amphotericin B in this model were effective in a dose-dependent manner.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ, USA and a donation from the Biermann Familie, Wörrstadt, Germany.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
A. J. U. was supported by an unrestricted grant from Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ, USA; he was also an advisor to Astellas Pharma Inc., Basilea Pharmaceutica, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer and Schering-Plough Corporation (including Essex Pharma, Germany), and has served on speakers' bureaux for Astellas Pharma Inc., Gilead, MSD, Pfizer and Schering-Plough Corporation (including Essex Pharma, Germany). A. C. is a full-time employee of Schering-Plough Research Institute. The other authors have nothing to disclose.


    Acknowledgements
 
This paper was presented in part at the Forty-fifth Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. This project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and a donation from the Biermann Family, Wörrstadt, Germany, for which we are deeply indebted. The histopathology pictures were made by Andreas Kreft, Pathology Institute of the University Mainz.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Funding
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Denning DW. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis. J Infect (1994) 28(Suppl 1):25–33.[Web of Science][Medline]

2 Lin SJ, Schranz J, Teutsch SM. Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis (2001) 32:358–66.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3 Espinel-Ingroff A. Comparison of In vitro activities of the new triazole SCH56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J Clin Microbiol (1998) 36:2950–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, et al. Clinical evaluation of a frozen commercially prepared microdilution panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of seven antifungal agents, including the new triazoles posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole. J Clin Microbiol (2002) 40:1694–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Sabatelli F, Patel R, Mann PA, et al. In vitro activities of posaconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against a large collection of clinically important molds and yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2006) 50:2009–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Ullmann AJ, Sanz MA, Tramarin A, et al. Prospective study of amphotericin B formulations in immunocompromised patients in 4 European countries. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 43:e29–38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7 Yang DJ, Rankin GO. Nephrotoxicity of antifungal agents. Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev (1985) 4:37–47.[Medline]

8 Schmitt HJ, Andrade J, Edwards F, et al. Inactivity of terbinafine in a rat model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (1990) 9:832–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9 Schmitt HJ, Bernard EM, Hauser M, et al. Aerosol amphotericin B is effective for prophylaxis and therapy in a rat model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1988) 32:1676–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Schmitt HJ, Bernard EM, Andrade J, et al. MIC and fungicidal activity of terbinafine against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1988) 32:780–1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, et al. In vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi: comparison of Etest and reference M38-A microdilution methods for determining posaconazole MICs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis (2003) 45:241–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

12 Latge JP. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev (1999) 12:310–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Fothergill AW, et al. Efficacy of SCH56592 in a rabbit model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2000) 44:780–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Marr KA, Carter RA, Crippa F, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of mould infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 34:909–17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

15 Martino R, Subira M. Invasive fungal infections in hematology: new trends. Ann Hematol (2002) 81:233–43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

16 Niki Y, Bernard EM, Edwards FF, et al. Model of recurrent pulmonary aspergillosis in rats. J Clin Microbiol (1991) 29:1317–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 Nomeir AA, Kumari P, Hilbert MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of SCH 56592, a new azole broad-spectrum antifungal agent, in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and cynomolgus monkeys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2000) 44:727–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 Cacciapuoti A, Loebenberg D, Corcoran E, et al. In vitro and in vivo activities of SCH 56592 (posaconazole), a new triazole antifungal agent, against Aspergillus and Candida. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2000) 44:2017–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Graybill JR, Bocanegra R, Najvar LK, et al. SCH56592 treatment of murine invasive aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother (1998) 42:539–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20 Oakley KL, Morrissey G, Denning DW. Efficacy of SCH-56592 in a temporarily neutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis with an itraconazole-susceptible and an itraconazole-resistant isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1997) 41:1504–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 Patera AC, Menzel F, Jackson C, et al. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor combination therapy on efficacy of posaconazole (SCH56592) in an inhalation model of murine pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 48:3154–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/5/1080    most recent
dkm328v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?