Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 59(2):305-308; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl473
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/2/305    most recent
dkl473v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanguinetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fadda, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanguinetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fadda, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

In vitro activity of Citrus bergamia (bergamot) oil against clinical isolates of dermatophytes

M. Sanguinetti1,*, B. Posteraro1, L. Romano2, F. Battaglia3, T. Lopizzo1, E. De Carolis1 and G. Fadda1

1 Institute of Microbiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome, Italy 2 Laboratory of Clinical Pathology and Microbiology, Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Campobasso, Italy 3 Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital of San Filippo Neri Rome, Italy


*Corresponding author. Tel: +39-06-30154964; Fax: +39-06-3051152; E-mail: msanguinetti{at}rm.unicatt.it

Received 4 May 2006; returned 5 July 2006; revised 26 October 2006; accepted 29 October 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: Recently, bergamot oil was shown to be a potent antifungal agent in vitro against clinically important Candida species. In this study, the activities of bergamot natural essence and its furocoumarin-free and distilled extracts on dermatophytes such as Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton species were investigated.

Methods: In vitro susceptibility testing assays on 92 clinical isolates of dermatophytes (Trichophyton mentagrophytes n = 20, Trichophyton rubrum n = 18, Trichophyton interdigitale n = 15, Trichophyton tonsurans n = 2, Microsporum canis n = 24, Microsporum gypseum n = 1 and Epidermophyton floccosum n = 12) were performed using the CLSI M38-A broth microdilution method, except for employing an inoculum of 1–3 x 103 cfu/mL. MICs were determined at a visual endpoint reading of 80% inhibition compared with the growth control.

Results: MICs (v/v) of all fungi ranged from 0.156% to 2.5% for the natural essence, from 0.02% to 2.5% for the distilled extract, and from 0.08% to 1.25% for the furocoumarin-free extract. The three isolates of T. tonsurans and M. gypseum exhibited the highest MIC values.

Conclusions: Data from this study indicate that bergamot oil is active in vitro against several common species of dermatophytes, suggesting its potential use for topical treatment of dermatophytoses.

Keywords: MIC , broth microdilution , antifungal susceptibility


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Unlike other superficial fungal infections, the incidence of dermatophytoses, commonly known as ringworm or tinea, has increased considerably,1,2 and this trend has paralleled the increased number of individuals with impaired immunity following treatment with cytotoxic drugs, broad-spectrum antimicrobials, or immunosuppressive agents.3 Some of these infections are still difficult to resolve completely, and remissions and relapses are often observed.1 Clinical and mycological cure of dermatophytoses may be prevented by the inability of the antifungal drug to penetrate the site of infection or by the intrinsic resistance of the fungus. Cases of infections due to griseofulvin-resistant isolates have been described,4 as well as a high-level primary resistance to terbinafine displayed by Trichophyton rubrum isolates obtained sequentially from a single onychomycosis patient who failed oral terbinafine therapy.5,6

The poor availability of antifungals and increasing number of treatment failures have motivated current searches for therapeutic alternatives to include the testing of essential oils (e.g. from Thymus vulgaris and Melaleuca alternifolia) as potential antimicrobial agents.79 Most of them contain large amounts of phenolic monoterpenes, which are responsible for activity against viruses, bacteria and fungi.911

The essential oil of Citrus bergamia, also called bergamot oil, is primarily produced in Calabria, in southern Italy, and from this country came the first information on the antimicrobial properties of this compound.12 This oil, termed by us as ‘natural essence’, is a yellow-green liquid directly obtained from the cold-pressed peels of the fruit, and consists of c. 80 volatile (e.g. limonene, linalool and linalyl acetate) and non-volatile (e.g. bergamottin, citroptene and bergaptene) components.13 As a consequence of the phototoxic action of furocoumarins (i.e. bergaptene) present in bergamot oil, furocoumarin-free and distilled extracts are often used, instead of the natural essence, in pharmaceutical products (Bergamon S.r.l., Rome, Italy). Of note, some of these products are empirically used for prevention and treatment of mycoses.

In our previous work, we investigated the antifungal properties of the bergamot natural essence and its furocoumarin-free and distilled extracts against vaginal isolates of several Candida species in vitro.14 We established that these preparations were effective agents, mainly when tested in association with boric acid, which suggested that they are potentially active against filamentous fungi as well. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of the three compounds on dermatophytes by the use of in vitro susceptibility assays.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Fungal isolates

Ninety-two isolates belonging to seven species of dermatophytes were tested. They were chosen from the culture collection of clinical isolates maintained at the Mycology Section of the Catholic University Medical Centre, and included 20 Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates, 18 T. rubrum, 15 Trichophyton interdigitale, 2 Trichophyton tonsurans, 24 Microsporum canis, 1 Microsporum gypseum and 12 Epidermophyton floccosum. Isolates had originally been identified to the species level by standard procedures15 and stored as water suspensions at room temperature. Prior to testing, each isolate was subcultured on a potato dextrose agar (PDA) slant and incubated at 30°C for 4–5 days or until good conidiation was produced. T. rubrum isolates were subcultured on rice agar plates to induce conidium sporulation.2 Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control strains.16

Fungal inoculum preparation

For each dermatophyte isolate, a suspension of conidia was prepared in 0.85% saline by swabbing the colony surface with a sterile swab, as reported recently.17 After the settling of the larger particles, conidia were counted with a haemocytometer and diluted in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, Milan, Italy) to correspond to a final inoculum concentration of 1 x 103–3 x 103 cfu/mL, as described previously.17 Yeast control strains were subcultured on PDA and incubated at 35°C for 24 h, and the corresponding inocula were prepared to final concentrations of 0.5 x 103–2.5 x 103 cfu/mL.18

Test compounds and susceptibility testing assays

Natural essence of bergamot (NE) and its distilled (DE) and furocoumarin-free (FF) extracts, produced by the Consorzio del Bergamotto of Reggio Calabria, Italy, were supplied by Bergamon S.r.l. (Rome, Italy). The chemical composition of the three preparations, as determined by gas and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy analyses, has been reported previously.14 In particular, the furocoumarin-free extract is bergaptene-free, whereas the distilled extract is absolutely devoid of non-volatile residues.14 Standard powders of antifungal drugs, such as itraconazole (Janssen, Beerse, Belgium) and griseofulvin (Sigma), were used to prepare stock solutions.17,18 In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes to all compounds was based on a modification of the CLSI M38-A broth microdilution method.16 Each oil preparation was diluted (v/v) in RPMI 1640 (Sigma), and Tween 80 (Sigma, final concentration 0.001% v/v) was included to enhance oil solubility. At this concentration, the detergent did not show any inhibitory effect on fungal growth (data not shown). Serial 2-fold dilutions of each test compound, prepared in RPMI 1640, were placed in 96-well microtitre plates.18 The individual ranges of each substance used were as follows: bergamot oil preparations, 0.02–10% (v/v); itraconazole, 0.03–16 mg/L; and griseofulvin, 0.125–64 mg/L. Growth and sterility control wells were included in each plate. After the addition of inocula (prepared as described earlier), plates were incubated for 96 h at 35°C (yeast controls were incubated for 24 h).17 MIC was determined visually and recorded as the lowest concentration of substance that reduced growth to 80% of that of the control.17 The minimum concentration of substance that inhibited 90% of the isolates was defined as MIC90. Isolates were tested twice. For the two isolates tested with itraconazole as quality controls, MICs were within expected ranges (for C. parapsilosis, 0.25 mg/L; for C. krusei, 0.5 mg/L).18


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Table 1 shows the MIC values for all the dermatophyte isolates tested against three bergamot oil preparations (NE, DE and FF). MICs ranged from 0.156% to 2.5% for NE, from 0.02% to 2.5% for DE and from 0.08% to 1.25% for FF. Generally, MIC90s were lower for DE and FF compared with NE. Among the species with fewer than 10 isolates, T. tonsurans (two isolates) and M. gypseum (one isolate) exhibited the highest MICs to NE, DE and FF, but again the MICs of DE or FF were lower than those of NE for both species. Consistent with our previous results,14 the MICs of NE, FF and DE for C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were 1.25%, 1.25% and 0.64%, respectively; for C. krusei ATCC 6258 were 2.5%, 2.5% and 0.64%, respectively. Griseofulvin and itraconazole gave MICs in the ranges of 0.125–≥64 and 0.03–0.25 mg/L, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. In vitro activity of bergamot oils, itraconazole and griseofulvin against 92 isolates of dermatophytes, determined by the microdilution broth method

 
In recent years, proliferation of new classes of drugs, such as the allylamines (e.g. terbinafine) and orally active triazoles (e.g. itraconazole), has represented the most noteworthy trend in dermatophytosis therapy.1 Many azoles, in particular itraconazole, have been used effectively, often resulting in complete clearance of the lesions.19 However, treatment with both itraconazole and terbinafine for prolonged times requires periodic laboratory monitoring of liver function.20 Moreover, these antifungal agents may have drug interactions with other medications.21 Griseofulvin, which had been for many years the only antifungal available for the treatment of dermatophytoses, is still the long-standing drug of choice for tinea capitis, but there are concerns with resistance and toxicities with this agent.21

Even though systemic antifungal therapy is often indicated—especially for tinea unguium, the most resistant of dermatophytoses—topical agents are still frequently used to cure or speed the resolution of uncomplicated lesions.1 This is in line with the current opinion that systemic therapy should be given consideration when lesions involving a large infected area fail to clear with repeated topical treatment using different drugs.22 The topical agents, applied to the surface of the skin in the form of creams, lotions or sprays, are known to readily penetrate into the stratum corneum to kill the fungi or render them unable to grow or divide. Fungicidal drugs such as terbinafine are often preferred over fungistatic azoles (miconazole, clotrimazole and ketoconazole) for treatment of dermatophytic fungal infections, since short-term treatments (i.e. one application daily for 1 week) are associated with high cure rates.23

Taken together, the improved cure rates, reduced adverse effects, decreased drug interactions and lower cost of topical agents make therapy with these drugs a favourable choice in the management of superficial fungal infections including dermatophytoses.21 In this context, new antifungal plant derivatives could be useful alternatives for the treatment of dermatophytoses where a topical therapy is required. The advantage of using these natural compounds may be a reduced risk of side-effects and lower cost. It is thus not surprising that, in recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of medicinal plants to cure skin diseases.

In this study, we demonstrated the high in vitro activity of bergamot oil against a wide number of clinical isolates of various pathogenic dermatophytes. In general, the three preparations tested had low MICs. However, the two extracts, DE and FF, were more active than NE against all of the species tested. This is of great importance in the light of the fact that the two derivatives are devoid (in part or completely) of non-volatile residues, in particular of the phototoxic bergaptene. Although we found the activities of these compounds against dermatophytes to be superior to the anticandidal effect we observed previously,14 our data all indicate that bergamot oil can be used as an efficacious antifungal agent against dermatophytes and yeast pathogens.

These results give substantial support to popular or anecdotal beliefs in the effectiveness of treating skin and mucosal infections with bergamot oils. The only other data in the literature on the antimycotic action of bergamot oil are those of Hammer et al.,24 who investigated the susceptibility of a single isolate of Candida albicans to NE. Otherwise, in vivo and in vitro studies conducted on M. alternifolia (tea tree) oil25 have established that some of the anecdotal claims made about natural oils have a scientific basis. In an interesting review, Martin and Ernst26 critically assessed the evidence, from controlled clinical trials, of the efficacy of antifungal plant oils and extracts. As reported in that systematic review, in some of these studies, plant preparations were compared with conventional antifungal treatments, and in all cases encouraging results were reported. Four trials described the promising use of tea tree oil preparations for treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis.26 Thus, this emphasizes the need for extensive studies to understand the ways in which bergamot oils inhibit fungi, and for clinical trials to prove their effectiveness in the cure of dermatophytoses.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
We would like to thank Dr Paul Kretchmer at San Francisco Edit for his assistance in editing this manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Weitzman I and Summerbell RC. (1995) The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:240–59.[Abstract]

2 Jessup CJ, Warner J, Isham N, et al. (2000) Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: establishing a medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 38:341–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Walsh TJ and Groll AH. (1999) Emerging fungal pathogens: evolving challenges to immunocompromised patients for the twenty-first century. Transpl Infect Dis 1:247–61.[CrossRef][Medline]

4 Artis WM, Odle BM, Jones HE. (1981) Griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytosis correlates with in vitro resistance. Arch Dermatol 117:16–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Mukherjee PK, Leidichh SD, Isham N, et al. (2003) Clinical Trichophyton rubrum strain exhibiting primary resistance to terbinafine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:82–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Favre B, Ghannoum MA, Ryder NS. (2004) Biochemical characterization of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton rubrum isolates. Med Mycol 42:525–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7 Mondello F, De Bernardis F, Girolamo A, et al. (2003) In vitro and in vivo activity of tea tree oil against azole-susceptible and -resistant human pathogenic yeasts. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:1223–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. (2002) In vitro activity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil against dermatophytes and other filamentous fungi. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:195–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Pina-Vaz C, Gonçalves Rodrigues A, Pinto E, et al. (2004) Antifungal activity of Thymus oils and their major compounds. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18:73–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 Dorman HJ and Deans SG. (2000) Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J Appl Microbiol 88:308–16.[CrossRef][Medline]

11 Cowan MM. (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Pizzimenti F, Tulino G, Marino A. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of bergamot oil. Programs and Abstracts of the International Congress: ‘Bergamotto 98. Stato dell'arte’Reggio Calabria, Italy, 1998 Abstract no. 38. Laruffa, Regio Calabria, Italy.

13 Verzera A, Trozzi A, Gazea F, et al. (2003) Effects of rootstock on the composition of bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso et Poiteau) essential oil. J Agric Food Chem 5:206–10.[CrossRef]

14 Romano L, Battaglia F, Masucci L, et al. (2005) In vitro activity of bergamot natural essence and furocoumarin-free and distilled extracts, and their associations with boric acid, against clinical yeast isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:110–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Kane J and Summerbell RC. (1999) Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, and other agents of superficial mycoses. In Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolkin RH (Eds.). Manual of Clinical Microbiology(ASM Press, Washington) pp. 1275–94.

16 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (2002) Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi: Approved Standard M38-A.(NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA).

17 Ghannoum MA, Chaturvedi V, Espinel-Ingroff A, et al. (2004) Intra- and interlaboratory study of a method for testing the antifungal susceptibilities of dermatophytes. J Clin Microbiol 42:2977–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (2002) Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard M27-A2(NCCLS, Villanova, PA, USA).

19 Tejasvi T, Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, et al. (2005) Invasive dermatophytosis with lymph node involvement in an immunocompetent patient. Clin Exp Dermatol 30:506–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

20 Zapata Garrido AJ, Romo AC, Padilla FB. (2003) Terbinafine hepatotoxicity. A case report and review of literature. Ann Hepatol 2:47–51.[Medline]

21 Huang DB, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Wu JJ, et al. (2004) Therapy of common superficial fungal infections. Dermatol Ther 2:517–22.

22 Gupta AK, Einarson TR, Summerbell RC, et al. (1998) An overview of topical antifungal therapy in dermatomycoses. A North American perspective. Drugs 55:645–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

23 Kyle AA and Dahl MV. (2004) Topical therapy for fungal infections. Am J Clin Dermatol 5:443–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

24 Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. (1999) Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol 86:985–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

25 Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. (2006) Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:50–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26 Martin KW and Ernst E. (2003) Herbal medicines for treatment of fungal infections: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Mycoses 47:87–92.[CrossRef]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/2/305    most recent
dkl473v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanguinetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fadda, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanguinetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fadda, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?