Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 2, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 58(1):117-124; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl173
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/117    most recent
dkl173v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sriskandan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sriskandan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Human intravenous immunoglobulin for experimental streptococcal toxic shock: bacterial clearance and modulation of inflammation

Shiranee Sriskandan1,*, Melissa Ferguson1,{dagger}, Victoria Elliot2, Lee Faulkner1 and Jonathan Cohen1,{ddagger}

1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK 2 Department of Histopathology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK


*Corresponding author. Tel: +44-208-383-3243; Fax: +44-208-383-3394; E-mail: s.sriskandan{at}imperial.ac.uk

Received 29 December 2005; returned 7 March 2006; revised 30 March 2006; accepted 9 April 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: Polyclonal human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been advocated as an adjunct to therapy in severe invasive streptococcal toxic shock because of its ability to neutralize superantigen toxins. The aim of this study was to assess IVIG therapeutic efficacy in an experimental model of streptococcal toxic shock.

Methods: To confirm the in vitro activity of IVIG against the Streptococcus pyogenes strain used in the study, IVIG was tested for superantigen neutralizing and bacterial opsonizing activity prior to in vivo studies. To evaluate the in vivo effects of IVIG in terms of microbiological outcome and disease severity in a superantigen-sensitive transgenic model of streptococcal shock, HLA-DQ transgenic mice were treated with IVIG either at the time of infection or after infection with S. pyogenes. Antibiotics were included in some studies.

Results: The IVIG preparation neutralized superantigenicity of S. pyogenes in vitro and enhanced bacterial killing in a whole blood assay. When given to mice at the time of S. pyogenes infection, IVIG neutralized circulating superantigens and reduced systemic inflammatory response. Remarkably, IVIG-enhanced systemic clearance of bacteria and enhanced neutrophil infiltrate into the infected tissues. However, when used in combination with penicillin and clindamycin in a delayed treatment setting, IVIG did not confer additional therapeutic benefit, in terms of inflammatory response, bacterial clearance or survival.

Conclusions: IVIG monotherapy can confer benefit in experimental streptococcal shock, but extension of these findings to the clinical situation will require further evaluation.

Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes , polyclonal human intravenous immunoglobulin , septic shock , superantigen


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Trials of polyclonal human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as an adjunct to treatment of severe sepsis have failed to demonstrate a reduction in mortality. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis concluded that IVIG should only be used in the context of randomized clinical trials in sepsis.1 Nonetheless, high dose (0.5–1.0 g/kg/day) IVIG has been advocated as a useful adjunct in the specific setting of invasive group A streptococcal disease and the streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS).2,3

Invasive group A streptococcal infection is associated with a mortality of 30–60%, particularly when associated with STSS. Although Streptococcus pyogenes has good in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics such as penicillin, deaths occur even in those appropriately treated. Mortality from STSS can be reduced by early recognition and medical treatment, prompt surgical debridement and inclusion of clindamycin in the drug regimen. Evidence for these strategies stems from a mixture of retrospective case–control studies, animal data and in vitro data.49 A recent European randomized controlled trial of IVIG in invasive streptococcal disease was terminated early because of slow patient recruitment.10 The small numbers included in the study, coupled with a mortality of 30% in the placebo group precluded any definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of IVIG in STSS, although there were some indications of potential benefit.11 In an earlier comparative observational study, Kaul et al.12 suggested that IVIG may be of benefit in STSS, though analysis of the data may have been confounded by the use of historical controls who were less likely to have received clindamycin or surgical intervention than IVIG-treated patients.

Mouse models of invasive streptococcal disease are well-established and have been used previously to study experimental approaches to therapy, such as the efficacy of clindamycin in treatment,13 though only one previous study has evaluated the therapeutic potential of IVIG experimentally.14 Patel et al.14 reported that IVIG therapy started 8 h after onset of infection provided no therapeutic benefit (either alone or in combination with antibiotics) in terms of bacterial clearance from thigh muscle in S. pyogenes-infected C57BL/6 mice. This study did not examine systemic inflammatory response, and also did not report the in vitro efficacy of IVIG against the S. pyogenes isolate used in the studies, in relation to either opsonizing efficiency or neutralization of toxins, both of which may be key beneficial properties of IVIG in STSS. IVIG is specifically proposed to inhibit harmful host pro-inflammatory responses to streptococcal superantigens which underlie STSS, but can also augment opsonization of bacteria and theoretically may assist bacterial clearance.15,16 C57BL/6 mice are resistant to the pro-inflammatory effects of streptococcal superantigens such as streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SPEA) and streptococcal mitogenic exotoxin Z (SMEZ), compared with ‘humanized’ transgenic mice which express human HLA class II molecules.17,18 It is therefore possible that any anti-inflammatory effect of IVIG would be masked in the C57BL/6 strain.

In this experimental study, we evaluated whether IVIG could provide any benefit against STSS in terms of bacterial clearance and severity of disease (evaluated by IL-6 levels, superantigen levels, organ histopathology and mortality) using HLA-DQ transgenic mice which are sensitive to streptococcal superantigens and which demonstrate clear pathological responses during sepsis that are directly attributable to superantigens such as SPEA and SMEZ.17,18 Importantly, prior to commencing in vivo studies, the IVIG was evaluated in vitro for its ability to both opsonize and neutralize the superantigenicity of the strain used in the experiments. Initial in vivo evaluation involved administration of IVIG at the time of infection, followed by evaluation of delayed IVIG administration in the antibiotic-treated setting.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Bacteria and IVIG

S. pyogenes strain H305 (M1T1, toxin genotype spea+, speg+, spej+, smez+, produces SPEA and SMEZ) was grown in Todd–Hewitt broth. MICs for this strain are as follows: penicillin, 0.001 mg/L; clindamycin, 0.078 mg/L (microtitre bioassay). Endobulin S/D (Baxter) 5% solution was made up from a lyophilized preparation as per manufacturer's instructions. Preliminary in vitro tests showed that Endobulin SD could neutralize recombinant SPEA and SMEZ. Controls were human albumin for injection 5% or, in some in vitro experiments, goat IgG 5% (Sigma, Poole, UK).

Opsonophagocytosis assay

Whole blood (mouse or human) (0.5–1.0 mL) containing 10 units/mL heparin was co-incubated with 30–50 cfu S. pyogenes, rolling at 37°C with different concentrations of IVIG or control for 3 h. Aliquots of the original inoculum and the incubated blood were plated onto agar for exact quantification of viable cfu present in both the inoculum and final culture. The multiplication factor (MF) was calculated for each sample (ratio of final cfu present after 3 h of incubation to original cfu present in inoculum). In some cases, blood samples were obtained for opsonophagocytosis assays from mice pre-treated with 1.5 µg of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; Amgen, Cambridge, UK) subcutaneously daily for 3 days. All studies used blood samples from three separate donors or mice.

Superantigen bioassays

Mononuclear cells [peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)] were prepared from normal human donor blood by density gradient centrifugation and then seeded at 2 x 105 cells/well in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin and 50 µg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). To assess neutralization of superantigens present in H305, PBMCs were co-incubated with 1% H305 supernatant in the presence or absence of IVIG. To measure superantigen activity in mouse serum, PBMCs were co-incubated with 1% serum from infected mice (six per group for pre-treatment and seven or nine per group for delayed treatment), as described previously.18 Proliferation was then measured in triplicate at 72 h by incorporation of tritiated thymidine.

Mouse model of necrotizing fasciitis

An overnight culture of H305 was washed, resuspended in sterile saline and used to prepare an inoculum of 108 cfu per mouse, which, when injected intramuscularly, leads to systemic illness and bacteraemia at 24 h.19 C57BL/10.DQ8 transgenic mice (20 g; carrying genomic constructs for DQA1*0301 and DQB1*0302, kindly supplied by Dr Daniel Altmann, Imperial College)17 were used; groups were age and sex matched. For quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses (serum IL-6, bacterial counts, histology) groups of 5 were used and experiments repeated once, except where stated. For survival studies, groups of 12 were used. All animal studies were conducted in accordance with institutional and Home Office ethical guidelines.

IVIG pre-treatment (no antibiotics)

To evaluate IVIG pre-treatment, IVIG 1 g/kg was administered intraperitoneally at the time of infection (0 h), followed by a second dose of IVIG 0.5 g/kg at 22 h (Figure 1a). Controls received the same volume of 5% albumin. Doses were determined from the planned clinical study.10 Blood and tissues were collected at 24 h for bacterial quantification, histopathology and serum IL-6 levels, measured by Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK).


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dosing schedule for comparison of IVIG treatment with albumin. (a) Pre-treatment regimen, IVIG commenced at the time of infection. (b) Delayed treatment regimen, IVIG treatment plus antibiotics commenced 24 h after the onset of infection. Controls received albumin instead of IVIG. Time in hours shown on bottom line.

 
Delayed treatment with antibiotics

Studies were conducted to determine the effect of commencing antibiotic treatment at 0, 6, 24 or 36 h following infection with S. pyogenes H305. Treatment with benzylpenicillin (240 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally in 6 hourly doses) and clindamycin (40 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally in 6 hourly doses) resulted in 100% survival if started at 0 or 6 h. A delay of 36 h led to 40% mortality by the time treatment began, hence a 24 h treatment delay was chosen, which incurred only one or two deaths prior to beginning treatment with antibiotics. Clindamycin/penicillin therapy sterilized blood and spleen tissue from S. pyogenes-infected mice, even when treatment onset was delayed by 24 h.

Delayed treatment with antibiotics and IVIG

Twenty-four hour after infection with S. pyogenes H305, mice commenced 6 hourly treatment with antibiotics, as above, in addition to high dose IVIG (1 g/kg followed by 0.5 g/kg 12 hourly, Figure 1b). Controls received 5% albumin instead of IVIG or received no antibiotics. Mice were bled (for serum IL-6) at 28 and 48 h, at which point tissues (whole thigh muscle, liver, spleen, kidney) were removed. Microbiological outcome was quantified from infected thigh muscle (cfu per gram of muscle). To evaluate survival, mice were monitored for 72 h.

Comparison of tissue antibiotic penetration in infection

Serum and muscle from five H305-infected mice or non-infected controls were collected 24 h after commencement of antibiotic treatment (48 h after infection). Muscle tissue was homogenized and resuspended in sterile saline (1 g/mL). Serial dilutions of muscle extract or serum were placed into wells cut into blood agar and then overlaid with a lawn of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (penicillin MIC 0.36 mg/L and clindamycin MIC 0.64 mg/L by Etest). Muscle extracts were also plated onto blood agar to measure H305 growth.

Histopathology

Coded formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections from infected mice (five per group, 30 µm sections from each muscle sample) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Tissues were compared by a pathologist blinded as to experimental group. For enumeration of neutrophils, the two most cellular areas in each muscle section were identified and neutrophils were counted in each of two high power fields per mouse.

Statistics

In vitro bacterial killing and mitogenesis assays were analysed using a t-test. IL-6 levels and bacterial counts from in vivo studies were compared using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Survival was compared using the log rank test.20


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Human IVIG can neutralize superantigens produced by strain H305

Significant depression of S. pyogenes-induced mitogenesis was seen with 0.5 mg/mL IVIG in the bioassay for superantigens (Figure 2a), confirming that the preparation could neutralize the combination of superantigens produced by this strain. Inhibition of S. pyogenes-induced mitogenesis was more marked than inhibition of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-induced mitogenesis (Figure 2b). Goat polyclonal IgG had no inhibitory effect on H305-induced mitogenesis, even when used at 5 mg/mL (not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In vitro efficacy of IVIG against strain H305 superantigenicity and bacterial growth. (a) Neutralization of S. pyogenes (H305) supernatant-induced human PBMC mitogenesis by IVIG, measured by thymidine incorporation, counts per minute (cpm). Goat IgG 0.5 mg/mL had no inhibitory activity (data not shown). (b) Effect of IVIG on lectin (PHA)-induced PBMC mitogenesis. (c) Effect of IVIG on multiplication of S. pyogenes (H305) in human whole blood. Error bars show SD of the mean of three results from separate donors. (d) Effect of IVIG 5 mg/mL on H305 multiplication in murine whole blood: comparison of whole blood from control mice and blood from mice receiving G-CSF pre-treatment. Error bars show SD of the mean of three results from separate mice. *Significant difference by t-test (P < 0.05).

 
IVIG can assist killing of S. pyogenes H305 in human and murine whole blood

Although humans are exposed to group A streptococci throughout life, opsonizing M-type-specific antibody is not always present in blood samples drawn from healthy donors. Strain H305 grew 100-fold in non-immune human blood. Growth was inhibited when cultures were co-incubated with 2.5 mg/mL IVIG and was reduced by 90% when 5 mg/mL IVIG was used. (Figure 2c).

In-bred mice have no prior exposure to group A streptococci and are therefore non-immune, permitting growth of S. pyogenes in blood. IVIG 5 mg/mL reduced growth of H305 by only 40% in murine blood (Figure 2d) and further inhibition could not be achieved, even by increasing IVIG concentrations to 10 mg/mL (not shown). However, when blood from mice pre-treated with G-CSF was used, to improve neutrophil numbers and expression of Fc receptors (FcR)-{gamma},21 growth of H305 in murine blood was inhibited by IVIG to a greater extent compared with controls (Figure 2d). Hence, human IVIG can assist the in vitro clearance of H305 from murine blood, though activity in the whole blood assay may be limited by the lesser neutrophil number.

IVIG given at time of infection can reduce IL-6 in superantigen-sensitive mice and can reduce bacterial spread

IVIG treatment given at the start of infection (t = 0 h) reduced 24 h IL-6 levels in S. pyogenes-infected mice compared with albumin-treated controls (Figure 3a). Intriguingly, systemic spread of bacteria was also reduced by IVIG treatment, as demonstrated by significant reductions in spleen (Figure 3b) and blood colony counts (Figure 3c).


Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Box-whisker plots showing effects of IVIG-alone pre-treatment on serum IL-6 levels (a) and spleen (b) and blood (c) bacterial counts (cfu) in S. pyogenes-infected DQ8 transgenic mice. n = 5 per group, representative of two repeated experiments. All differences between albumin- and IVIG-treated mice are significant (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U-test).

 
IVIG given at time of infection can improve neutrophil recruitment to site of infection

To further investigate the mechanism of IVIG-enhanced bacterial clearance, histopathological examination of muscle from IVIG and albumin-treated S. pyogenes-infected HLA-DQ mice was undertaken. This suggested a marked difference in recruitment of neutrophils to the site of infection (Figure 4a–d). Semi-quantitative analysis showed that IVIG-treated mice had more neutrophils within muscle than albumin-treated mice (Figure 4e).


Figure 4
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. (a–d) Photomicrographs showing effect of IVIG pre-treatment on muscle tissue from four separate S. pyogenes-infected HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice. Left-hand panels (a and b) are from control (albumin)-treated mice, showing marked bacterial growth (arrows) and paucity of neutrophils; central panels (c and d) are from IVIG-treated mice, showing abundant neutrophil infiltrate (arrows) and paucity of visible bacteria. Magnification x200. (e) Enumeration of neutrophils per high power field in coded muscle sections taken from IVIG- or albumin-treated S. pyogenes-infected mice (five per group). Results representative of repeat analysis.

 
IVIG given at time of infection neutralizes circulating bioactive superantigens

To study the mechanism of IVIG-induced reduction in IL-6, we investigated the extent to which IVIG treatment had reduced circulating superantigens in infected mice using an ex vivo mitogenesis bioassay. IVIG administration significantly reduced the amount of circulating bioactive superantigen by ~60% in H305-infected mice when blood was drawn 24 h after onset of infection (Figure 5). Nonetheless, superantigenic effects were still detectable in the serum, hence the dose of IVIG was doubled to 2 g/kg on day 1, followed by 1 g/kg for subsequent studies where treatment was delayed.


Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of IVIG pre-treatment on circulating bioactive superantigen in HLA-DQ transgenic mice 24 h after onset of infection with S. pyogenes. Comparison is made with S. pyogenes-infected mice receiving albumin and with serum from uninfected mice (NMS). Error bars represent SD. Means of 6–7 observations per group. Differences between IVIG- and albumin-treated mice are significant.

 
Delayed treatment using IVIG with antibiotics does not enhance bacterial clearance from muscle

The effect of delaying treatment to 24 h and using antibiotics at the same time as IVIG was then investigated. Preliminary studies had shown that penicillin and clindamycin treatment led to sterilization of blood and spleen cultures, hence it was necessary to collect thigh muscle in order to determine whether bacterial clearance was affected by IVIG therapy. Muscle was collected 72 h after start of infection (48 h after start of treatment). Surprisingly, group A streptococci were easily cultured from muscle, despite exposure to antibiotics which had cleared bacteria from blood and spleen. Mice receiving albumin in conjunction with antibiotics had a similar level of bacterial growth in thigh muscle (median, 4.7 x 107 cfu/g tissue; range, 0.9–17 x 107 cfu/g) to mice receiving IVIG with antibiotics (median, 5.3 x 107 cfu/g tissue; range, 2.2–7.7 x 107 cfu/g). Hence, when combined with antibiotics, IVIG did not enhance bacterial clearance from muscle.

We considered the possibility that viable streptococci may persist in thigh muscle due to poor penetration of antibiotics into necrotic tissue or internalization of streptococci into host cells. However, muscle tissue antibiotic activity, as measured by inhibition zone diameter, was easily detectable and indistinguishable between infected and non-infected mice (21.3 ± 1.5 mm from neat non-infected muscle extract compared with 22.3 ± 2.8 mm from infected muscle extract; further dilution did not reveal any divergence between the study groups and activity was detected in samples diluted 1:8). Antibiotic activity could also be easily detected in serum from infected mice, even when diluted 4-fold (not shown). Histopathological examination showed that all visible bacteria were extracellular.

Delayed treatment using IVIG with antibiotics does not affect severity of infection or survival

In conjunction with antibiotic treatment, albumin-treated (control) S. pyogenes-infected mice still had significantly elevated mitogenic activity in serum 24 h after onset of treatment (25 541.2 ± 5589 cpm, n = 9). However, in conjunction with antibiotic treatment, IVIG therapy reduced mitogenicity of infected mouse serum (9872 ± 6691 cpm, n = 7) to levels seen in normal, uninfected mouse serum (8025 ± 1517 cpm, n = 7). Despite this, in conjunction with antibiotic treatment, IVIG therapy did not affect production of IL-6, a recognized marker of disease severity, when compared with albumin-treated controls 24 h after start of treatment (48 h after onset of infection). The experiment was conducted using both low (105 cfu) and high (3 x 108 cfu) inocula to achieve mild (no mortality) and moderate (40% mortality) severity of infection (Figure 6). Furthermore, IVIG treatment did not affect IL-6 levels measured at two other time points after infection in antibiotic-treated mice (28 and 36 h, not shown). IL-6 levels were much lower than those observed in the earlier studies, as antibiotic usage prevented bacteraemia. Histopathology from liver, kidney, spleen and muscle tissue in each treatment group was compared but no differences were noted.


Figure 6
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. IL-6 levels in antibiotic (Ab)-treated mice 48 h after onset of infection, treated either with albumin (albumin/Ab) or IVIG (IVIG/Ab); no differences are seen between the groups. Results are shown for two experiments: (a) low S. pyogenes inoculum (105 cfu, n = 5 per group) and (b) high S. pyogenes inoculum (inoculum 3 x 108 cfu, n = 8 per group). Error bars show SD of the mean IL-6. There are no significant differences between the groups.

 
In conjunction with antibiotic therapy, IVIG did not confer additional survival benefit when compared with albumin-treated antibiotic-exposed controls. To ensure that any possible therapeutic benefit of IVIG was not masked by low control mortality, survival experiments were repeated using a reduced dose of penicillin (100 mg/kg/day). In this setting, IVIG again did not confer additional survival benefit when compared with albumin-treated antibiotic-exposed controls (Figure 7a and b).


Figure 7
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Kaplan Meier plots showing lack of benefit of IVIG compared with albumin in antibiotic-treated S. pyogenes-infected mice. (a) Standard antibiotic dosing. (b) Reduced penicillin dose. n = 12 per group, (untreated controls, n = 7). P > 0.2 log rank test. Ab, antibiotics. For both experiments the inoculum was 3 x 108 cfu.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
This study provides evidence that IVIG can assist in bacterial clearance, neutralize circulating superantigen, and reduce illness severity in experimental streptococcal shock provided that treatment is commenced at the onset of infection. Using superantigen-sensitive mice and an IVIG preparation with known activity against S. pyogenes, delayed IVIG therapy did not confer overall therapeutic advantage in an antibiotic-treated model.

IVIG is widely considered an effective adjunctive treatment for streptococcal shock despite the lack of definitive clinical evidence.1,22 This study represents the only in-depth analysis of the efficacy and mechanism of IVIG action in experimental STSS, using an HLA-DQ transgenic model of sepsis which is highly responsive to superantigens. In contrast to an earlier study,14 the IVIG used here had demonstrable neutralizing activity against the superantigens produced by S. pyogenes and, furthermore, provided opsonizing activity in human and, to a lesser extent, murine blood. The lesser activity of IVIG in murine blood may in part explain the lack of protection seen in the earlier study. We hypothesized that in vitro opsonizing activity in murine blood may be limited by lower neutrophil counts and possible inter-species differences in FcR, though human IgG is known to successfully interact with rodent FcR.23 The in vitro opsonizing activity of IVIG in mouse blood improved following G-CSF therapy, which is known to increase neutrophil counts and FcR expression,21 confirming that the activity of human IVIG in mouse blood is limited by quantitative differences in neutrophil or FcR number rather than inter-species incompatibility. Surprisingly, IVIG administered to infected mice at 0 h markedly reduced the systemic bacterial load and systemic inflammatory response in mice infected with S. pyogenes. G-CSF and interferon-{gamma} are significantly raised in HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice compared with wild-type controls during S. pyogenes infection (S. Sriskandan, M. Ferguson and L. Faulkner, unpublished data), and the cytokine burst that accompanies infection may provide additional stimulation to murine neutrophils, facilitating the interaction with human IVIG. IVIG had no direct antibacterial activity (data not shown).

Intriguingly, histopathology showed that IVIG treatment was associated with a greater influx of neutrophils to the site of infection. Quantification of neutrophils by myeloperoxidase assay was not feasible due to high background levels of myeloperoxidase in leg tissue. We speculate that IVIG may neutralize a range of S. pyogenes virulence factors which impede neutrophil recruitment and activation, such as the IL-8 cleaving cell envelope proteinase SpyCEP,24,25 thereby improving the overall host response to infection. Importantly, this study is the first to demonstrate any benefit of polyspecific human immunoglobulin on systemic bacterial clearance in experimental S. pyogenes sepsis.

IVIG administered at time 0 h also reduced serum IL-6. IL-6 is known to be a reliable marker of disease severity in this model and high levels are associated with early mortality;19 other cytokines are difficult to detect except immediately prior to death and could not be assayed in this model using standard ELISA due to interference from the high prevailing concentrations of IVIG. IVIG-induced reduction in disease severity may relate directly to enhanced bacterial clearance or to neutralization of bacterial toxins known to cause inflammation, such as superantigens. An earlier clinical study showed that IVIG present in patient plasma has the potential to neutralize exogenous superantigens ex vivo.16 We now show for the first time that IVIG directly neutralizes systemic superantigen activity produced during experimental sepsis. Although the serum bioassay for superantigens may reflect the presence of circulating pro-mitogenic cytokines in addition to superantigens, we have previously shown that the mitogenic effects of serum from patients with STSS can be obliterated specifically with anti-superantigen antibodies, suggesting that the contribution of cytokines is small.26

Having established that IVIG pre-treatment can reduce bacterial load, superantigen activity, and illness severity in experimental S. pyogenes sepsis, the effects of delayed therapy were then evaluated in antibiotic-treated mice, to assess the likely benefits of IVIG in a model which resembled the clinical setting. The delayed dual antibiotic-treated model represents a significant advance in S. pyogenes modelling, as it reproduced the illness severity commonly encountered in clinical practice, with relatively rapid onset of sepsis, a delay in treatment of around 24 h and a mortality of 60–70%. IVIG did not reduce severity in the antibiotic-treated model, using IL-6 as a severity marker. As an alternative to IL-6, plasma lactate was also measured in groups receiving delayed treatment with antibiotics and IVIG or albumin, though no differences were seen between treatment groups (data not shown). Delayed antibiotic therapy cleared bacteria from the blood and spleen, and therefore microbiological outcome was measured by bacterial quantification from infected muscle. IVIG treatment did not reduce bacterial load in muscle in antibiotic-treated mice, however. We were surprised that viable S. pyogenes persisted in muscle despite bactericidal levels of antibiotic in both serum and muscle extract. We speculate that S. pyogenes can acquire an antimicrobial-resistant or biofilm phenotype during invasive infection in vivo if not actively growing, leading to relative resistance to antimicrobials.27 Careful histopathological examination showed that extracellular bacteria dominated, though we cannot exclude the possibility that small foci of intracellular bacteria might act as a source for waves of replication, or that the combination of antibiotics used led to a bacteriostatic effect in muscle rather than bactericidal effect.

Consistent with bacteriology and IL-6 data, mortality was unaffected by IVIG treatment in the antibiotic-treated setting. It is possible that a beneficial effect of IVIG might be revealed in settings where treatment, such as antibiotic dose, is suboptimal. Antibiotic doses used in this study were based on recommendations in the European Strep-Ig study protocol and UK formularies.

Using IVIG with defined anti-S. pyogenes activity and a superantigen-sensitive humanized murine model of invasive streptococcal disease, we have demonstrated that human IVIG has therapeutic activity when administered at the time of infection. Despite these findings, IVIG did not confer detectable additional protection when used in conjunction with standard antibiotic therapy in the delayed treatment setting. Notwithstanding the difficulties inherent in conducting clinical studies in STSS, additional clinical trial data will be required before one can confidently state that IVIG is indicated in therapy for STSS.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Imperial College was awarded a research grant from Baxter Healthcare (investigators S. S. and J. C.). The authors declare no additional competing interests.


    Footnotes
 
{dagger}Present address. Children's Hospital, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia Back

{ddagger}Present address. Dean, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Medical School Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9PX, UK Back


    Acknowledgements
 
Presented in part at the Forty-second Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), San Diego, CA, 2002 (Abstract B1435), and at the XV Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases (LISSSD), Goa, India, 2002 (Abstract O8.1). This work was partly funded by a research grant from Baxter Healthcare.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1 Pildal J and Gotzsche PC. (2004) Polyclonal immunoglobulin for treatment of bacterial sepsis: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 39:38–46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 Perez CM, Kubak BM, Cryer HG, et al. (1997) Adjunctive treatment of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome using intravenous immunoglobulin: case report and review. Am J Med 102:111–3.[Web of Science][Medline]

3 Stegmayr B, Bjorck S, Holm S, et al. (1992) Septic shock induced by group A streptococcal infection: clinical and therapeutic aspects. Scand J Infect Dis 24:589–97.[Medline]

4 Brook I, Gober AE, Leyva F. (1995) In vitro and in vivo effects of penicillin and clindamycin on expression of group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal capsule. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:1565–8.[Abstract]

5 Gemmell CG, Peterson PK, Schmeling D, et al. (1981) Potentiation of opsonization and phagocytosis of Streptococcus pyogenes following growth in the presence of clindamycin. J Clin Invest 67:1249–56.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 Sriskandan S, McKee A, Hall L, et al. (1997) Comparative effects of clindamycin and ampicillin on superantigenic activity of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Antimicrob Chemother 40:275–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Stamenkovic I and Lew PD. (1984) Early recognition of potentially fatal necrotizing fasciitis. N Engl J Med 310:1689–93.[Abstract]

8 Sudarsky LA, Laschinger JC, Coppa GF, et al. (1987) Improved results from a standardized approach in treating patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Ann Surg 206:661–5.[Web of Science][Medline]

9 Zimbelman J, Palmer A, Todd J. (1999) Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 18:1096–100.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 Darenberg J, Ihendyane N, Sjolin J, et al. (2003) Intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 37:333–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

11 Stevens DL. (1998) Editorial response: rationale for the use of intravenous gamma globulin in the treatment of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 26:639–41.[Web of Science][Medline]

12 Kaul R, McGeer A, Norrby-Teglund A, et al. (1999) Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome-a comparative observational study. Clin Infect Dis 28:800–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

13 Stevens DL, Gibbons AE, Bergstrom R, et al. (1988) The Eagle effect revisited: efficacy of clindamycin, erythromycin, and penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal myositis. J Infect Dis 158:23–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

14 Patel R, Rouse MS, Florez MV, et al. (2000) Lack of benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin in a murine model of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. J Infect Dis 181:230–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

15 Basma H, Norrby-Teglund A, McGeer A, et al. (1998) Opsonic antibodies to the surface M protein of group A streptococci in pooled normal immunoglobulins (IVIG): potential impact on the clinical efficacy of IVIG therapy for severe invasive group A streptococcal infections. Infect Immun 66:2279–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Norrby-Teglund A, Kaul R, Low DE, et al. (1996) Plasma from patients with severe invasive group A streptococcal infections treated with normal polyspecific IgG inhibits streptococcal superantigen-induced T cell proliferation and cytokine production. J Immunol 156:3057–64.[Abstract]

17 Sriskandan S, Unnikrishnan M, Krausz T, et al. (2001) Enhanced susceptibility to superantigen-associated streptococcal sepsis in human leukocyte antigen-DQ transgenic mice. J Infect Dis 184:166–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

18 Unnikrishnan M, Altmann DM, Proft T, et al. (2002) The bacterial superantigen SMEZ is the major immunoactive agent of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Immunol 169:2561–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Sriskandan S, Moyes D, Buttery LK, et al. (1996) Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SPEA) release, distribution and role in a murine model of fasciitis and multi-organ failure due to Streptococcus pyogenes. J Infect Dis 173:1399–407.[Web of Science][Medline]

20 Altman DG. (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research (Chapman & Hall, London).

21 van Spriel AB, van den Herik-Oudijk IE, van Sorge NM, et al. (1999) Effective phagocytosis and killing of Candida albicans via targeting Fc{gamma}RI (CD64) or Fc{alpha}RI (CD89) on neutrophils. J Infect Dis 179:661–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

22 Laupland KB, Boucher P, Rotstein C, et al. (2004) Intravenous immunoglobulin for severe infections: a survey of Canadian specialists. J Crit Care 19:75–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

23 Weisman LE and Lorenzetti PM. (1989) High intravenous doses of human immune globulin suppress neonatal group B streptococcal immunity in rats. J Pediatr 115:445–50.[Medline]

24 Edwards RJ, Taylor GW, Ferguson M, et al. (2005) Specific C-terminal cleavage and inactivation of interleukin-8 by invasive disease isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Infect Dis 192:783–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

25 Voyich JM, Musser JM, DeLeo FR. (2004) Streptococcus pyogenes and human neutrophils: a paradigm for evasion of innate host defense by bacterial pathogens. Microbes Infect 6:1117–23.[CrossRef][Medline]

26 Proft T, Sriskandan S, Yang L, et al. (2003) Superantigens and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis 9:1211–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

27 Conley J, Olson ME, Cook LS, et al. (2003) Biofilm formation by group A streptococci: is there a relationship with treatment failure? J Clin Microbiol 41:4043–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Trop DoctHome page
L. Doganci, E. Tanyel, H. Basibuyuk, and O. Darka
A fatal case of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome
Trop Doct, April 1, 2008; 38(2): 129 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Nooh, N. El-Gengehi, R. Kansal, C. S. David, and M. Kotb
HLA Transgenic Mice Provide Evidence for a Direct and Dominant Role of HLA Class II Variation in Modulating the Severity of Streptococcal Sepsis
J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 3076 - 3083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. Sriskandan
Human intravenous immunoglobulin for experimental streptococcal toxic shock: bacterial clearance and modulation of inflammation--author's response
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2007; 59(1): 159 - 160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. Rajagopalan, R. Patel, S. V. Kaveri, and C. S. David
Comment on: Human intravenous immunoglobulin for experimental streptococcal toxic shock: bacterial clearance and modulation of inflammation
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2007; 59(1): 157 - 159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/117    most recent
dkl173v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sriskandan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sriskandan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?