Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 13, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(4):648-653; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl033
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/4/648    most recent
dkl033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Guardabassi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hasman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Guardabassi, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Heterologous expression of glycopeptide resistance vanHAX gene clusters from soil bacteria in Enterococcus faecalis

Henrik Hasman1,*, Frank M. Aarestrup1, Anders Dalsgaard2 and Luca Guardabassi2

1 Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Bülowsvej 27, 1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark; 2 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark


* Corresponding author. Tel: +45-72-34-63-47; Fax: +45-72-34-63-41; E-mail: hha{at}dfvf.dk

Received 6 December 2005; returned 23 December 2006; revised 20 January 2006; accepted 24 January 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine whether glycopeptide resistance gene clusters from soil bacteria could be heterologously expressed in Enterococcus faecalis and adapt to the new host following exposure to vancomycin.

Methods: The vanHAX clusters from Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus PT-2B1, Paenibacillus apiarius PA-B2B and Amycolatopsis coloradensis DSM 44225 were separately cloned in an appropriately constructed shuttle vector containing the two-component regulatory system (vanRS) of Tn1546. The complete vanAPT operon (vanRSHAXY) from P. thiaminolyticus PT-2B1 was cloned in the same shuttle vector lacking enterococcal vanRS. All plasmid constructs were electroporated into E. faecalis JH2-2 and the MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin were determined for each recombinant strain before and following exposure to sublethal concentrations of vancomycin.

Results: The vanHAX clusters from P. thiaminolyticus and P. apiarius conferred high-level vancomycin resistance (MIC ≥ 125 mg/L) in E. faecalis JH2-2. In contrast, cloning of the vanHAX cluster from A. coloradensis did not result in a significant increase of vancomycin resistance (MIC = 0.7 mg/L). Resistance to vancomycin was not observed after cloning the complete vanAPT operon from P. thiaminolyticus (MIC = 2 mg/L), but this recombinant rapidly adapted to high concentrations of vancomycin (MIC = 500 mg/L) following exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of this antibiotic.

Conclusion: The results showed that vanAPT in P. thiaminolyticus is a possible ancestor of vanA-mediated glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. Experimental evidence supported the hypothesis that enterococci did not acquire glycopeptide resistance directly from glycopeptide-producing organisms such as A. coloradensis.

Keywords: vanA , Amycolatopsis coloradensis , Paenibacillus


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Vancomycin and teicoplanin are glycopeptide antibiotics of critical importance in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections caused by staphylococci and enterococci. Resistance to this class of antibiotics was initially reported in enterococci in 19881 and has recently emerged in Staphylococcus aureus.2,3 Six types of glycopeptide resistance operons have been described in enterococci (vanA to vanE and vanG).4,5 The vanA type is the most common in enterococci and the only one reported in S. aureus. This operon is associated with the transposable element Tn15466 and contains two regulatory genes (vanR and vanS), three resistance genes (vanH, vanA and vanX) and two accessory genes that are not required for glycopeptide resistance (vanY and vanZ). The minimal requirement for glycopeptide resistance is the expression of D-lactate dehydrogenase (vanH), D-Ala-D-Lac ligase (vanA) and DD-peptidase (vanX) genes, which results in the synthesis of peptidoglycan precursors with low affinity for glycopeptides and elimination of native (susceptible) precursors, therefore conferring high-level resistance to glycopeptides.4

Glycopeptide resistance operons also occur in Gram-positive bacilli. The vanF operon is associated with Paenibacillus popilliae, a biopesticide which was used in the United States for more than 50 years for suppression of Japanese beetle populations.7 Recently, operons with up to 94% gene identity to Tn1546 have been described in Paenibacillus spp. isolated from soil.8,9 Genetic elements resembling vanA operons have also been reported in clinical isolates of Bacillus circulans,10 Oerskovia turbata and Arcanobacterium haemolyticum.11 More distantly related vanHAX gene clusters are known to occur in glycopeptide-producing actinomycetes.12 The vanHAX clusters in producers have been regarded as the possible ancestors of glycopeptide resistance operons in enterococci.5,12,13 However, the lack of a two-component regulatory system and the low similarity with enterococcal vanHAX clusters (54–64% predicted amino acid identity) suggest that glycopeptide resistance operons in enterococci were not directly acquired from glycopeptide producers. Other bacteria, most probably Gram-positive endospore-forming bacilli, may have acted as donors of glycopeptide resistance to enterococci.8

In this study, the vanHAX clusters from two soil Paenibacillus strains and the glycopeptide producer Amycolatopsis coloradensis were cloned into Enterococcus faecalis to examine their ability to confer resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin. The aim of the study was to determine whether glycopeptide resistance gene clusters of soil origin could be heterologously expressed in enterococci. Such information is essential for clarifying the possible role played by different soil bacteria in the acquisition of glycopeptide resistance by enterococci.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
Bacterial strains

The avoparcin-producing strain A. coloradensis DSM 44225 was originally isolated from soil in Colorado.14 Glycopeptide-resistant Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus PT-2B1 and Paenibacillus apiarius PA-B2B were isolated from Danish soil.8 E. faecalis JH2-2, a glycopeptide-susceptible strain commonly used for gene transfer experiments in Enterococcus,15 was used as a recipient for studying heterologous expression of glycopeptide resistance. Enterococcus faecium BM4147 was the first strain in which glycopeptide resistance of the vanA type was described1 and was a positive control in the cloning experiments.

Sequencing of the vanHAX cluster in A. coloradensis DSM 44225

We sequenced the complete DNA region covering the vanHAX cluster in A. coloradensis DSM 44225, including 123 bp upstream of the start codon of vanH and 281 bp downstream of the stop codon of vanX (3113 bp). The D-Ala-D-Ala ligase from A. coloradensis was amplified and sequenced using degenerate primers designed to detect vanA and vanB homologues.8 The flanking regions were sequenced by inverse PCR.16 Chromosomal DNA was purified using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim Germany), digested with EcoRV (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA), which did not cut within the amplified fragment, and purified using a GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). Subsequently, chromosomal DNA was circularized using T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 2 µL of the ligation mix was used for PCR amplification and DNA sequencing using specific primers designed to read outwards from the initial sequence. Based on these sequencing results, additional restriction digestions of the chromosomal DNA were carried out using AluI and SalI, and the circularization of purified restricted DNA was repeated as described above. Again, the circularized DNA was amplified with primers designed to read upstream and downstream of the previously sequenced DNA. These PCR products were sequenced and new primers were designed based on this new sequence, until the complete sequence of the gene cluster was obtained. Sequencing of the PCR products was carried out using an Amplitaq dye terminator kit and a 373A automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The Vector NTI suite, v8.0 (Invitrogen), was used to assemble sequencing fragments.

Construction of pHHA223

The vanHAX genes of P. apiarius PA-B2B, P. thiaminolyticus PT-2B1 and A. coloradensis DSM 44225 were cloned in the vector pHHA223. This vector was based on the promoter probe vector pAK80, which carries an erythromycin resistance cassette for selection in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The pHHA223 vector was designed to contain the regulatory system from Tn1546 (vanRS) as well as the corresponding promoters upstream of the vanR and vanH genes, respectively.17,18 It was constructed by digesting pAK8019 with BglII and SalI to substitute the lacLM genes with a small oligo linker. This linker was created using primers 842 and 843 (all primers are listed in Table 1), containing an internal SmaI site and overhangs compatible with BglII and SalI digested DNA. The digested pAK80 and the linker were ligated to generate the plasmid pHHA214. pHHA214 was then digested with SmaI and SalI, and was ligated to a PCR-generated fragment containing the transcriptional terminator from rrnB present on the pBAD myc-his/c plasmid (Invitrogen), which was amplified using primer 1534 carrying a SmaI site, and R583 carrying a SalI site, thus generating the plasmid pHHA222. The two-component regulatory system from Tn1546 (vanRS), its promoter (PvanRS) and the vanA promoter situated downstream (PvanA) were amplified from E. faecium BM4147 using primers 1306 containing a HindIII site and 1307 containing a BglII site. The PCR product was digested with HindIII and BglII and ligated in pHHA222 digested with the same two enzymes, resulting in the plasmid pHHA223. The integrity of pHHA223 was confirmed by plasmid isolation using a Qiagen Plasmid Midi kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada)20 followed by sequencing using primers flanking the inserted DNA as well as primers matching the internal sequence. In all cases, the following PCR programme was used: 5 min at 95°C, 25 cycles including 15 s at 98°C, 15 s at 60°C and 2 min at 72°C, followed by 10 min of a final extension at 72°C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. List of oligonucleotides used in the study including added restriction enzyme recognition sites (underlined)

 
Cloning of vanHAX clusters in pHHA223

The three vanHAX gene clusters of soil origin were cloned in pHHA223, generating the variants pHHA224 (P. apiarius), pHHA227 (P. thiaminolyticus) and pHHA228 (A. coloradensis). In addition, the vanHAX cluster from E. faecium BM4147 was cloned in pHHA223 to form pHHA225.

All vanHAX clusters were amplified using PhusionTM High-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes Oy, Espoo, Finland) with the primers listed in Table 1. Amplification was carried out using the following programme: 30 s at 98°C, 25 cycles with 10 s at 98°C, 15 s at 68°C and 2 min at 72°C, followed by 10 min at 72°C. Purified PCR products were digested either with BglII plus SmaI or, for the vanHAX cluster from A. coloradensis, with BamHI plus SmaI and ligated into pHHA223. All constructs were transferred into electrocompetent E. coli DH10B cells (Invitrogen) and subsequently transferred into electrocompetent E. faecalis JH2-2 as described previously.21 The sequence of the insert in each plasmid construct was confirmed.

Cloning of vanAPT operon from P. thiaminolyticus in pHHA222

The complete vanAPT operon (vanRSHAXY) from P. thiaminolyticus was cloned in pHHA222. Two primers (1542 and 1543) were designed to amplify a 7318 bp fragment covering the vanAPT operon in P. thiaminolyticus PT-2B1 (GenBank ID: DQ018710 [GenBank] ) and the 1151 bp region upstream of vanRPT containing a putative promoter. Both primers were designed to contain BglII sites (underlined) for cloning the vanAPT operon in the BglII site of pHHA222. The final construct was named pHHA226. The integrity of pHHA226 was confirmed by plasmid isolation as described earlier followed by sequencing using internal primers covering the complete gene cluster.

MIC determination

E. faecalis JH2-2 transformed with pHHA224, pHHA225, pHHA226, pHHA227 and pHHA228 was tested for susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Susceptibility was assessed by the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI guidelines.22 The MICs of vancomycin were determined in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth using concentrations between 0.2 and 2000 mg/L. The MICs of teicoplanin were determined using custom-made panels covering a range from 2 to 32 mg/L (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Basingstoke, UK).

Growth experiments

Recombinant strains were grown on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates containing 20 mg/L erythromycin to maintain the transformed plasmids and incubated overnight at 37°C. Bacterial cultures were diluted in Mueller–Hinton II broth according to the CLSI recommendations for antibiotic susceptibility testing22 and 100 µL was inoculated into 100-well Bioscreen microwell plates containing an equal volume of Mueller–Hinton broth supplemented with 40 mg/L erythromycin and vancomycin at concentrations ranging from 0 to 128 mg/L. The Bioscreen microwell plate was inserted into Bioscreen C apparatus (Oy Growth Curves AB Ltd., Helsinki Finland) and analysed using the software Research Express (Transgalactic Ltd, Helsinki, Finland). Hardware settings were as follows: temperature 37°C, shaking before measurement (10 s, medium, 80 steps) and measuring at OD600 every 15 min in 24 h. Each strain was tested in the same medium at least three times and the minimal doubling time (T2-min) and the time until the maximal growth rate was reached (TV-max) were calculated by averaging these data.

Adaptation of pHHA226 to JH2-2 was studied following exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of vancomycin. JH2-2 containing pHHA226 and pHHA222 (control) was exposed to gradually increased concentrations of vancomycin (0.5–6 mg/L). The two recombinant strains were grown overnight at 37°C in Mueller–Hinton II broth containing 20 mg/L of erythromycin and 0.5 mg/L of vancomycin. Aliquots of 125 µL of each of the two cultures were then transferred to different tubes containing 25 mL of Mueller–Hinton II broth supplemented with 20 mg/L of erythromycin and 0.5, 1.5, 3, 4.5 or 6 mg/L of vancomycin, followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. Bacterial cultures from tubes with visible growth were further transferred into fresh tubes containing the same concentration of vancomycin. This was repeated until the strain carrying pHHA226 was able to grow in the presence of the higher concentration of vancomycin (6 mg/L). This adapted strain was then tested for susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin, as described earlier.

Accession number

The complete sequence of the vanHAX cluster in A. coloradensis DSM 44225 was submitted to GenBank (accession no. DQ246438 [GenBank] ).


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
The existence of a vanHAX-like gene cluster in the avoparcin-producing soil bacterium A. coloradensis has been reported previously.12,13 We determined the entire nucleotide sequence of the vanHAX gene cluster in A. coloradensis, revealing the presence of three open reading frames (ORFs) of 1053 bp (vanH), 1041 bp (vanA) and 612 bp (vanX) oriented in the same direction. The GC content (63%) of the three genes was significantly higher than that of Tn1546 (44%). The three ORFs had high identity scores to the corresponding genes in the vancomycin producer Amycolatopsis orientalis (GenBank AF060799 [GenBank] ). Lower levels of nucleotide identity were observed in comparison with the vanHAX cluster in Tn1546 (GenBank M97297 [GenBank] ). Overall, the vanHAX cluster in A. coloradensis had 84.6% identity to that in A. orientalis and 58.8% identity to Tn1546, with 82.0, 85.5 and 84.6% identity to each of the individual vanH, vanA and vanX genes, respectively, from A. orientalis and 56.9, 58.0 and 61.8% identity to the same genes from Tn1546. These data confirmed the evolutionary distance between the vanHAX cluster in A. coloradensis and Tn1546. No apparent promoter sequence with similarity to the recognition site for eubacterial RNA polymerases containing {sigma}70-like subunits could be identified in the 123 bp region upstream of the vanHAC gene. The presence of a promoter cannot be excluded, however, as high GC content streptomycetes have previously been shown to possess promoters that diverge significantly from traditional eubacterial promoters.23

The vanHAX gene clusters from P. apiarius (pHHA224), A. coloradensis (pHHA228), P. thiaminolyticus (pHHA227) and E. faecium BM4147 (pHHA225) were cloned into the vancomycin-responsive expression vector pHHA223. This strategy positioned the different vanHAX gene clusters downstream of the vanA promoter from Tn1546 under inducible control of the vanRA and vanSA, thus excluding differential expression of their native promoters. E. faecalis JH2-2 transformants containing pHHA224, pHHA227 and pHHA225 (positive control) were fully resistant to vancomycin (Table 2). In contrast, the vanHAX cluster from A. coloradensis (pHHA228) did not result in any change in susceptibility to vancomycin or teicoplanin compared with the negative control (JH2-2 carrying pHHA223). Comparison of growth experiments using JH2-2 carrying either pHHA228 or pHHA223 showed that pHHA228 did not confer any growth advantage in the presence of vancomycin. Both recombinants exhibited growth at 0.6 mg/L with the same minimal doubling time (T2-min) and full growth inhibition at 0.7 mg/L (data not shown). Introduction of the vanHAX cluster from A. coloradensis under the control of the vanA promoter and the vanRA and vanSA regulatory system into E. faecalis did not result in any growth advantage in the presence of vancomycin. As both the promoter and the regulatory system originated from Tn1546, this suggested that expression of the vanHAX genes from A. coloradensis in E. faecalis did not lead to functional proteins. An explanation for this could be insufficient translation caused by the significant difference in codon usage between high GC content actinomycetes and the low GC content E. faecalis; however, this was not examined further. As functional protein synthesis is a prerequisite for establishment and adaptation of the gene cluster in enterococci, it seems unlikely that glycopeptide resistance originated in enterococci from the acquisition of this gene cluster.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. MICs (mg/L) of vancomycin and teicoplanin for strains used in the study

 
The levels of vancomycin resistance of E. faecalis JH2-2 transformants varied considerably depending on the cloned gene cluster, with the vanHAX cluster from E. faecium (pHHA225) conferring higher levels of resistance than those from P. thiaminolyticus (pHHA227) and P. apiarius (pHHA224). Heterologous expression of glycopeptide resistance in E. faecalis JH2-2 was correlated to the level of nucleotide identity of the cloned vanHAX cluster to Tn1546 since the vanHAX clusters in P. thiaminolyticus and P. apiarius are 92 and 87% identical to Tn1546, respectively.9 The observed differences in the vancomycin resistance phenotypes of the three recombinant strains were confirmed when minimal doubling time (T2-min) was studied in the presence of vancomycin (Figure 1). Above 16 mg/L, JH2-2 carrying pHHA224 grew significantly slower than JH2-2 carrying pHHA225 or pHHA227. Furthermore, the time necessary to reach this minimal growth rate (TV-max) was significantly delayed in JH2-2 carrying pHHA224 (data not shown). Accordingly, the vanHAX cluster from P. apiarius seemed not to be functionally adapted to enterococci and could represent either an earlier step in the evolution of Tn1546 or a parallel evolution. Introduction of either pHHA224 or pHHA227 into E. faecalis JH2-2 conferred reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin (MIC = 4 mg/L). This could be due to the lack of vanZ in the cloned gene clusters, as this gene may be required to confer full resistance to teicoplanin.24


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Average doubling time (T2-min) of JH2-2 carrying the cloned gene clusters from P. apiarius PA-B2B (pHHA224), Tn1546 (pHHA225) and P. thiaminolyticus PT-2B1 (pHHA227) grown in increasing concentrations of vancomycin.

 
The genetic construct containing the entire vanAPT operon from P. thiaminolyticus (pHHA226) resulted in only a small decrease in vancomycin susceptibility (MIC = 2 mg/L) and no change in teicoplanin susceptibility (MIC < 0.5 mg/L). However, acquisition of this operon by enterococci could result in a significant selective advantage in the presence of low concentrations of vancomycin. We tested whether exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of vancomycin could increase functional expression of the gene cluster in the heterologous host. Indeed, after 4 days of continued growth (approximately 27 generations), the strain was able to survive at higher concentrations of vancomycin (MIC = 500 mg/L) and teicoplanin (MIC = 8 mg/L). In contrast, JH2-2 containing pHHA222 was not able to adapt to higher concentrations of glycopeptides and maintained low MICs of vancomycin (0.7 mg/L) and teicoplanin (≤0.5 mg/L). Therefore, the complete vanHAX cluster from P. thiaminolyticus conferred an initial growth advantage to E. faecalis in the presence of sub-lethal concentrations of vancomycin as well as the ability to adapt to higher concentrations of the antibiotic within a short time. An explanation for the initial low level of resistance towards vancomycin of the cloned gene cluster in E. faecalis could be that either the regulatory genes or the vanA promoter was not optimal for expression in this new host and therefore had to be adapted to the new environment. The nature of this adaptation still remains to be resolved. However, the requirement of relatively few generations indicates that only a few adaptive mutations are necessary in order to achieve high-level resistance to vancomycin.

It has been suggested that DNA contamination originating from the avoparcin-producing A. coloradensis leads to the uptake of glycopeptide resistance genes by animal commensal bacteria.13 This DNA would then subsequently be taken up either through an intermediate bacterial host or directly by enterococci, thus ultimately leading to the emergence of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci. As an alternative hypothesis, Guardabassi et al.9 indicated that vanA operons nearly identical to those occurring in clinical enterococci might have existed in soil bacteria belonging to the genus Paenibacillus a long time before avoparcin was introduced as a feed additive in animal production. According to this hypothesis, glycopeptide resistance operons were acquired by enterococci from the bacteria belonging to the genus Paenibacillus or other soil bacilli where these genetic elements had previously emerged. This study corroborates this second hypothesis, indicating that vanA operons from paenibacilli could have been adapted in enterococci, conferring on them an ecological advantage in the presence of antibiotic selective pressure.

On the basis of current knowledge, the vanA operons from paenibacilli such as P. apiarius and P. thiaminolyticus described here can be considered the probable ancestors of enterococcal vanA operons. Nevertheless, transfer of vanAPA or vanAPT to enterococci has not been demonstrated in vitro. Transfer might have occurred as a consequence of a rare recombination event and this could reflect the difficulties in reproducing such an event in the laboratory. It should be noted that the vanAPT operon is not associated with the transposase and the resolvase typical of Tn1546.9 Thus, it seems that Tn1546 has evolved from two components, the gene cluster conferring inducible glycopeptide resistance, which was probably acquired from Gram-positive bacilli, and the set of genes allowing transposition, the origin of which remain unknown. Interestingly, a small DNA fragment with 95% identity to part of the Tn1546 transposase has recently been associated with the vanF gene cluster of P. popilliae, indicating that both components could in fact have been present in paenibacilli simultaneously.25 Further research on the possible occurrence of this recombinase in glycopeptide-susceptible enterococci and in soil bacterial communities may provide useful information to understand the evolutionary process leading to the origin of Tn1546.


    Transparency declarations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
None to declare.


    Acknowledgements
 
We wish to thank Dorte S. Madsen and Jane N. Larsen at the Danish Institute of Food and Veterinary Research for their excellent help. The work presented in this article was supported by a grant from the Danish Research Agency–Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council (23-01-0170).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Transparency declarations
 References
 
1. Leclercq R, Derlot E, Duval J et al. Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 157–61.[ISI][Medline]

2. Tenover FC, Weigel LM, Appelbaum PC et al. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a patient in Pennsylvania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 275–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC et al. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1342–7.[Free Full Text]

4. Gholizadeh Y, Courvalin P. Acquired and intrinsic glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 16: 11–7.

5. Reynolds PE, Courvalin P. Vancomycin resistance in enterococci due to synthesis of precursors terminating in D-alanyl-D-serine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 21–5.[Free Full Text]

6. Arthur M, Molinas C, Depardieu F et al. Characterization of Tn1546, a Tn3-related transposon conferring glycopeptide resistance by synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 117–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Patel R, Piper K, Cockerill FR III et al. The biopesticide Paenibacillus popilliae has a vancomycin resistance gene cluster homologous to the enterococcal VanA vancomycin resistance gene cluster. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 705–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Guardabassi L, Christensen H, Hasman H et al. Members of the genera Paenibacillus and Rhodococcus harbor genes homologous to enterococcal glycopeptide resistance genes vanA and vanB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 4915–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Guardabassi L, Perichon B, van Heijenoort J et al. Glycopeptide resistance vanA operons in Paenibacillus strains isolated from soil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 4227–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ligozzi M, Lo CG, Fontana R. vanA gene cluster in a vancomycin-resistant clinical isolate of Bacillus circulans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 2055–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Power EG, Abdulla YH, Talsania HG et al. vanA genes in vancomycin-resistant clinical isolates of Oerskovia turbata and Arcanobacterium (Corynebacterium) haemolyticum. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36: 595–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Marshall CG, Lessard IA, Park I et al. Glycopeptide antibiotic resistance genes in glycopeptide-producing organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 2215–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Lu K, Asano R, Davies J. Antimicrobial resistance gene delivery in animal feeds. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 679–83.[ISI][Medline]

14. Labeda DP. Amycolatopsis coloradensis sp. nov., the avoparcin (LL-AV290)-producing strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45: 124–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Jacob AE, Hobbs SJ. Conjugal transfer of plasmid-borne multiple antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus faecalis var. zymogenes. J Bacteriol 1974; 117: 360–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Hui EK, Wang PC, Lo SJ. Strategies for cloning unknown cellular flanking DNA sequences from foreign integrants. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54: 1403–11.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

17. Silva JC, Haldimann A, Prahalad M et al. In vivo characterization of the type A and B vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) VanRS two-component systems in Escherichia coli: a nonpathogenic model for studying the VRE signal transduction pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 11951–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Holman TR, Wu Z, Wanner BL et al. Identification of the DNA-binding site for the phosphorylated VanR protein required for vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 4625–31.[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Israelsen H, Madsen SM, Vrang A et al. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61: 2540–7.[Abstract]

20. Hasman H, Aarestrup FM. tcrB, a gene conferring transferable copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium: occurrence, transferability, and linkage to macrolide and glycopeptide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 1410–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Dunny GM, Leonard BA. Cell-cell communication in gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 1997; 51: 527–64.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

22. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antibicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard M7-A4. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA, 2003.

23. Strohl WR. Compilation and analysis of DNA sequences associated with apparent streptomycete promoters. Nucleic Acids Res 1992; 20: 961–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Arthur M, Depardieu F, Molinas C et al. The vanZ gene of Tn1546 from Enterococcus faecium BM4147 confers resistance to teicoplanin. Gene 1995; 154: 87–92.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

25. Fraimow H, Knob C, Herrero IA et al. Putative VanRS-like two-component regulatory system associated with the inducible glycopeptide resistance cluster of Paenibacillus popilliae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2625–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Talebi, M. R. Pourshafie, M. Katouli, and R. Mollby
Molecular Structure and Transferability of Tn1546-Like Elements in Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Clinical, Sewage, and Surface Water Samples in Iran
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 74(5): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/4/648    most recent
dkl033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Guardabassi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hasman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Guardabassi, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?