JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 17, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(1):8-13; doi:10.1093/jac/dki405
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leading article |
Treating HCV with ribavirin analogues and ribavirin-like molecules
California Pacific Medical Center, Liver Transplant Program, Division of Hepatology and Complex GI, 2340 Clay Street, #223, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA
* Tel: +1-415-600-1022; Fax: +1-415-776-0292; E-mail: gishr{at}sutterhealth.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nucleos(t)ide analogues have proven useful in the treatment of viral infections. Ribavirin is a nucleoside, guanosine analogue, whose mechanisms of action include inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), which is the key step in de novo guanine synthesis, a requirement for viral replication. In combination with pegylated interferon alfa, ribavirin is the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C today. However, the medication is associated with significant haemolytic anaemia, which may require dose reduction, discontinuation or treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin. Dose reduction also appears to decrease sustained viral clearance rates. Newer IMPDH inhibitors are in various stages of development. Viramidine, a liver-targeting prodrug of ribavirin, has demonstrated significant antiviral activity and erythrocyte-sparing properties. It is currently in Phase 3 trials. Clinical trials of merimepodib, another investigational IMPDH inhibitor, have completed enrolment for a Phase 2b study as a third medication for administration with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Although other IMDPH inhibitors also have antiviral activity, these medications appear best suited as immunosuppressive medications at this time.
Keywords: inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase , merimepodib , viramidine , anaemia , antiviral treatments
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical studies of combination therapies for chronic hepatitis C have shown sustained viral response (SVR) rates of
55%.1,2 Efforts to raise this rate of response have been blocked by numerous obstacles involving patient, viral and medication factors, including patient- and virus-related variables (e.g. cirrhosis, viral levels, race, genotype), adverse events requiring dose reductions or medication discontinuation (e.g. anaemia, depression, cytopenias) and non-adherence to treatment regimens. For example, an essential component of therapy for chronic hepatitis C is ribavirin, a nucleoside analogue that inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), among other mechanisms of action; however, ribavirin is also associated with potential dose-limiting haemolytic anaemia that compromises SVR rates.3,4 Pharmaceutical manufacturers are responding by developing a number of new, safer anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) medications including IMPDH inhibitors, protease inhibitors, polymerase inhibitors, helicase inhibitors, internal ribosomal entry site inhibitors, small and expressed interfering RNAs, ribozymes and several new interferons (e.g. albumin-interferon alfa, consensus-interferon, interferon-
).5,6 Several ribavirin-like molecules presently under development have the potential to improve outcome compared with standard ribavirin. | Ribavirin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ribavirin, first discovered in 1970, is a guanosine analogue with broad-spectrum antiviral activity.7,8 The medication's biochemical name is 1-ß-D-ribofuranosyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide.7 It has a chemical formula of C8H12N4O5 and a molecular weight of 244.2 (Figure 1).7
|
Pharmacology
Nucleotide synthesis in HCV infection. HCV is an enveloped virus and member of the genus Hepacivirus within the Flaviviridae family.9 It has a single-stranded RNA genome with positive polarity. Within the cell, nucleotides required for RNA and DNA synthesis are made available through one of two pathways: (i) salvage from recycling nucleosides and nucleobases from native RNA and DNA; and (ii) de novo synthesis. The rapidity of the cell cycle may necessitate a greater complement of nucleotides than are available by salvage alone and, thus, the de novo pathway has been proposed as the primary source of nucleotides for RNA and DNA synthesis in rapidly proliferative cell synthesis (Figure 2).10,11 In de novo synthesis, IMPDH (EC 1.1.1.205 [EC] ) catalyses the NAD+-dependent conversion of inosine monophosphate into xanthine monophosphate, the rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of guanine nucleotides. The enzyme has two isoforms: the type I isoform is constitutively expressed, whereas the type II isoform is up-regulated in rapidly proliferating cells.12 Inhibitors of IMPDH prevent the synthesis of guanosine monophosphate blocking the formation of guanosine nucleotide through the de novo pathway.
|
Direct mechanisms of action. Ribavirin enters the cell as a prodrug and is converted into ribavirin 5'-monophosophate (RMP), -diphosphate (RDP) and -triphosphate (RTP) through the sequential actions of three cellular kinases (Figure 3).8 The actions of RMP, a direct competitive inhibitor of IMPDH, decreases intracellular levels of guanosine triphosphate (GTP). Because GTP is essential for transcription of viral genomes and replication of RNA viruses, low levels of GTP are thought to down-regulate viral replication. Ribavirin inhibits viral guanylyltransferase and mRNA (guanine-7N-)-methyltransferase activity, thereby creating mRNA with abnormal 5'-cap structures and blocking viral transcription.13 Ribavirin phosphates inhibit viral polymerase; consequently, the enzyme is unable to create copies of the original positive-stranded (antisense) viral RNA.14 In addition, ribavirin can be incorporated into viral RNA by the polymerase15 giving rise to ribavirin-induced mutations in the viral genome and replication error (suicide mutations) catastrophe, which results in fewer infectious virions16 and thus interferes with inter-hepatocyte infection. This raises concerns about the damage to host genetic (chromosomal) structures and probably results in or contributes to the teratogenicity of ribavirin. Ribavirin is also considered as a carcinogen in some animal and in vivo models.7,17
|
Indirect mechanisms of action. Acute control of HCV RNA levels occurs through a brisk intrahepatic T-helper and T-suppressor cell response, a shift toward a Th1 cytokine profile and up-regulated natural killer cell activity.18 This adaptive immune response favours elimination of virus-infected cells. However, as this process continues Th2 predominance develops, which is associated with infection chronicity.19 This may be the result of suppressive effects of HCV core proteins on production of interleukin-12, a cytokine essential for induction of Th1 immunity.20 Administration of ribavirin shifts the response towards Th1 cells and their associated cytokines.21 The resultant Th1 cytokines, particularly interferon-
, appear to inhibit production of the HCV virion, enhance immunologically mediated lysis of infected hepatocytes, inhibit neoplastic transformation and down-regulate hepatic fibrogenesis.20 The latter appears to inhibit proliferation and activation of hepatic stellate cells, which are the principal mediators of hepatic collagen formation and extracellular matrix deposition.22 Adverse events
Ribavirin is associated with haemolytic anaemia that can be either predictable and dose related or unpredictable and potentially dose limiting. Plasma ribavirin is transported into erythrocytes by the es nucleoside transporter and is converted into RMP, RDP and RTP.23 The ribavirin phosphates accumulate because erythrocytes lack the phosphatases needed to hydrolyse them.23 Accumulation of the ribavirin phosphates, with a relative deficiency of adenosine triphosphate, produces cellular toxicity and subsequent extravascular haemolysis. Depletion of high energy phosphates is thought to lead to down-regulation of the hexose monophosphate shunt with an associated increased sensitivity of the erythrocyte to oxidative damage and resultant haemolysis.24 Ribavirin-related anaemia often occurs rapidly during the first 4 weeks of therapy, when it is crucial to maintain ribavirin levels to maximize chances for an SVR.
In clinical trials, haemoglobin (Hb) levels in pegylated interferon/ribavirin-treated patients decrease by an average of 23 g/dL. Approximately 1013% of patients experience significant anaemia with Hb levels declining below 10 g/dL, the cut point for initiating ribavirin dose reduction in accordance with the ribavirin prescribing information, and up to 52% of patients develop a Hb of <12, the threshold at which oncology patients begin to experience symptoms associated with decreases in quality of life.25,26 However, because the effect of anaemia on outcomes is a function of factors, such as gender, renal function, geographic elevation, age, comorbidities, activity and rate of Hb decreases, dose reductions may be necessary in patients with Hb levels >10 g/dL. In the pegylated interferon alfa-2aribavirin licensing study anaemia prompted ribavirin dose reductions in 22% of patients treated for 48 weeks.25
| Ribavirin monotherapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The efficacy of ribavirin monotherapy in patients with HCV infection has been evaluated in several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.27,28 Results of these and other clinical evaluations2931 indicated that ribavirin treatment had modest transient effects on plasma HCV RNA levels but lowered aminotransferase levels. Study results also suggest that ribavirin monotherapy leads to improvement in hepatic histology in some patients who show a biochemical response.28,29,32 However, the biochemical responses are usually transient and the histological improvements are generally modest. In combination with standard or pegylated interferon, however, ribavirin significantly improves virological outcomes by reducing relapse rates. Therefore, this combination is the current standard of care.33
| Ribavirin-like molecules in development |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Viramidine
Pharmacology. Viramidine is a liver-targeting, synthetic nucleotide prodrug of ribavirin. Studies of the immunomodulatory activity of the medication indicate that its effect on Th1 cytokine production and T-cell proliferation is preserved and similar to that of ribavirin.34 Viramidine is structurally similar to adenosine35 and can thus be converted into its active form by hepatic adenosine deaminase, a ubiquitous enzyme that catalyses the hydrolysis of adenosine to inosine and ammonia (Figure 4). Both ribavirin and viramidine are rapidly eliminated. Both the parent molecules and metabolites are excreted by the kidneys and have a Tmax of 1.53 h.23 Neither medication significantly binds to serum proteins.36 In non-human primates, the higher viramidine:ribavirin ratio in portal compared with systemic plasma indicates that viramidine is predominantly taken up by the liver (first pass effect) and activated (converted) in the liver to ribavirin by adenosine deaminase.37 The ribavirin once it is derived from viramidine is subsequently concentrated in the liver. Experimentally, hepatic retention of the ribavirin that is derived from a single oral dose of viramidine is 3-fold greater than that of oral ribavirin. In the same non-human primate model, viramidine produces 50% higher levels of ribavirin in the liver but only one-half in the plasma and red blood cells (RBCs).23 Because it produces lower RBC levels of ribavirin phosphates, viramidine has the potential to maintain Hb concentrations in patients treated with combination therapy. Studies of cytochrome P450 metabolism in pooled hepatic microsomal fractions indicate that neither medication significantly inhibits or activates the principal human cytochromes.36 Both viramidine and ribavirin are filtered by the glomeruli and excreted into the urine; however, the amount of either medication measured in urine is only 25% indicating that both are predominantly eliminated by metabolism.
|
Adverse events. Pharmacokinetic and safety studies of viramidine have demonstrated that it is safe and tolerable. Most reported adverse events are mild. The respective percentages of treatment-emergent adverse events that were deemed possibly related to viramidine 200, 600 and 1200 mg were 0, 26 and 50%, respectively.23 The majority of adverse events were mild and most resolved without sequelae.
Clinical trial results. End-of-treatment and SVR results from a Phase 2 randomized, active-controlled, multicentre study of pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus either viramidine or ribavirin in 180 treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C demonstrated no significant differences between the treatment groups in the proportion of patients with undetectable HCV RNA levels, regardless of HCV genotype during therapy.38,39 However, significantly fewer patients developed anaemia in the viramidine-treatment groups than in the ribavirin group (4% versus 27%; P < 0.001) (Figure 5). No cases of anaemia were reported among patients receiving viramidine 400 mg twice daily, and only one case was reported among those receiving 600 mg twice daily (2%). In contrast, the incidence of defined anaemia was 11% in the viramidine 800 mg twice daily treatment group and 27% in the ribavirin group. Other adverse events were similarly observed between treatment groups.38,39
|
Phase 3 trials of viramidine 600 mg twice daily, known as VISER1 and VISER2 (VIramidine's Safety and Efficacy versus Ribavirin), are currently comparing viramidine plus pegylated interferon alfa-2a or -2b. These studies were designed to determine whether viramidine is as effective as ribavirin and to confirm the medication's erythrocyte-sparing propertiesan effect that would remove ribavirin-related anaemia and the associated need for dose modification or recombinant human erythropoietin from the therapeutic equation.
Merimepodib
Merimepodib (VX-497) is a competitive, oral IMPDH inhibitor with a molecular weight of 452.5 kDa (Figure 6).10 The medication is a novel, selective inhibitor of IMPDH that was in clinical development for the treatment of HCV infection. Merimepodib inhibits both IMPDH isoforms and is structurally unrelated to other medications that show similar catalytic activity. When tested against a variety of DNA and RNA viruses merimepodib demonstrated significant activity.10 Combination therapy with merimepodib or ribavirin plus interferon alfa showed modest additive activity, with merimepodib more potent in this combination than ribavirin.
|
Pharmacology. Zha et al.40 performed a pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic analysis to evaluate the potential relationships between the plasma exposure to merimepodib and ribavirin and the 12-week virological responses or development of anaemia in 31 patients who did not respond to a previous course of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Merimepodib or placebo was administered in combination with ribavirin plus pegylated interferon alfa-2a to 31 patients infected with HCV genotype 1. At the end of 12 weeks, 28 patients had completed therapy with pegylated interferon plus weight-based ribavirin in addition to placebo (n = 9), merimepodib 25 mg (n = 8) or merimepodib 50 mg (n = 11) given every 12 h.40
Preliminary results showed that the AUC012 of merimepodib was significantly higher in patients who showed a virological response than in those who did not.40 In the logistical regression analysis, age and merimepodib AUC012 were the only significant predictors of 12 week virological response. At week 12, a 2-log drop in HCV RNA was reported in 60%, 75% and 80% of patients in the second, third and fourth quartiles of merimepodib plasma drug exposure, respectively, but in no patient in the lowest quartile. The percentage decrease in Hb correlated with trough levels of ribavirin but not the AUC012 of merimepodib. These preliminary results supported further studies of triple therapy with these agents.40
Clinical trials.
A Phase 2b trial designed to evaluate two doses of merimepodib added to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in non-responders has completed enrolment.41 The goal of this US trial was to enrol
315 patients into three study groups at 55 clinical sites. All study patients will receive pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in standard doses. Two groups were to also receive merimepodib twice daily, one group at each dose level being tested and a third group was to receive the pegylated interferon and ribavirin plus placebo. Response to treatment was to be evaluated at 24 weeks, and responders were to receive a total of 48 weeks of therapy. Outcome measures would have included end-of-treatment response, SVR, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunomodulatory activity.
Other IMPDH inhibitors
Mycophenolate mofetil is an IMPDH inhibitor used for immunosuppression in the transplantation setting, including orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis C (Figure 7). Its immunosuppressive activities appear to far exceed the medication's antiviral properties, although there are currently no ongoing trials to evaluate the medication in this indication.42 Mycophenolate may be useful for immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune disease as well as autoimmune liver disease and can help with manifestations of chronic hepatitis C.43 Mizoribine is an IMPDH inhibitor that is marketed as an immunosuppressant (Figure 8). Like mycophenolate, mizoribine has shown antiviral properties but is not currently in clinical trials for treatment of hepatitis C. Mizoribine inhibits the replication of HCV at a concentration (5 µM) similar to that reported for ribavirin44 and thus may find use in anti-HCV regimens in the future.
|
|
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the introduction of ribavirin, its ability to inhibit IMPDH has made it a central component in pegylated interferon-based combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, the haemolytic anaemia associated with ribavirin therapy is potentially dose limiting. Whereas recombinant human erythropoietin can be used to treat the anaemia, its use adds a second medication to treat the complications of the first medication. Experimental studies have demonstrated that other IMPDH inhibitors have antiviral activity. Viramidine, a liver-targeting ribavirin prodrug, has been shown to have end-of-treatment efficacy and SVR comparable to that of ribavirin when combined with pegylated interferon with a substantially lower rate of anaemia. If two large ongoing Phase 3 trials confirm this, viramidine may be used more commonly as the oral antiviral agent in combination regimens with pegylated interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. While a Phase 2b trial of merimepodib has completed enrolment, preliminary pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic results of the anti-HCV activity of merimepodib in combination with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin have resulted in discontinuation of clinical trials. Current data suggest that all other IMPDH inhibitors such as mycophenolate are best used as immunosuppressive therapy.
| Transparency declarations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Robert G. Gish, MD discloses that he has received grant/research support from, is a consultant for, or on the speakers bureau of Intermune, Bayer, Ortho Biotech, Roche, Schering-Plough and Valeant.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
I acknowledge Richert Goyette, MD for providing writing and editorial assistance.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 95865.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
2.
Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 97582.
3. Sulkowski MS. Anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 Suppl 4: S31522.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Lindahl K, Stahle L, Bruchfeld A et al. High-dose ribavirin in combination with standard dose peginterferon for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005; 41: 2759.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. McHutchison JG, Patel K. Future therapy of hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002; 36 Suppl 1: S24552.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
6. McHutchison JG, Dev AT. Future trends in managing hepatitis C. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2004; 33 Suppl 1: S5161.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
7. Copegus® (ribavirin) [package insert]. Nutley, NJ: Roche Laboratories Inc., 2005.
8.
Wu JZ, Walker H, Lau JYN et al. Activation and deactivation of a broad-spectrum antiviral drug by a single enzyme: adenosine deaminase catalyzes two consecutive deamination reactions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 42631.
9.
Krönke J, Kittler R, Buchholz F et al. Alternative approaches for efficient inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by small interfering RNAs. J Virol 2004; 78: 343646.
10.
Markland W, McQuaid TJ, Jain J et al. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of the IMP dehydrogenase inhibitor VX-497: a comparison with ribavirin and demonstration of antiviral additivity with
interferon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 85966.
11. Gish RG. Ribavirin Analogues and Ribavirin-like Molecules: New Directions in Antiviral Therapy. http://clinicaloptions.com/hep/treatment/easlsatsym/#gish (30 August 2005, date last accessed).
12.
Carr SF, Papp E, Wu JC et al. Characterization of human type I and type II IMP dehydrogenases. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 2728690.
13. Goswami BB, Borek E, Sharma OK et al. The broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin inhibits capping of mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1979; 89: 8306.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14.
Eriksson B, Helgstrand E, Johansson NG et al. Inhibition of influenza virus ribonucleic acid polymerase by ribavirin triphosphate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1977; 11: 94651.
15.
Maag D, Castro C, Hong Z et al. Hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NS5B) as a mediator of the antiviral activity of ribavirin. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 460948.
16.
Crotty S, Cameron CE, Andino R. RNA virus error catastrophe: direct molecular test by using ribavirin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 6895900.
17. Kochhar DM, Penner JD, Knudsen TB. Embryotoxic, teratogenic, and metabolic effects of ribavirin in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980; 52: 99112.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18.
Abonyi ME, Lakatos PL. Ribavirin in the treatment of hepatitis C. Anticancer Res 2005; 25: 131520.
19.
Vollmer J, Rankin R, Hartmann H et al. Immunopharmacology of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and ribavirin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 23147.
20. Cecere A, Marotta F, Vangieri B et al. Progressive liver injury in chronic hepatitis C infection is related to altered cellular immune response and to different cytokine profile. Panminerva Med 2004; 46: 17187.[Web of Science][Medline]
21. Fang S-H, Hwang L-H, Chen D-S et al. Ribavirin enhancement of hepatitis C virus core antigen-specific type 1 T helper cell response correlates with the increased IL-12 level. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 7918.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22.
Shen H, Zhang M, Minuk GY et al. Different effects of rat interferon
, ß and
on rat hepatic stellate cell proliferation and activation. BMC Cell Biol 2002; 3: 9.[CrossRef][Medline]
23.
Lin C-C, Philips L, Xu C et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of viramidine, a prodrug of ribavirin, in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 44: 26575.
24. De Franceschi L, Fattovich G, Turrini F et al. Hemolytic anemia induced by ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: role of membrane oxidative damage. Hepatology 2000; 31: 9971004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Pegasys® (peginterferon alfa-2a) [package insert]. Nutley, NJ: Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 2004.
26. Birgegard G, Aapro MS, Bokemeyer C et al. Cancer-related anemia: pathogenesis, prevalence and treatment. Oncology 2005; 68 Suppl 1: 311.[CrossRef][Medline]
27.
Di Bisceglie AM, Conjeevaram HS, Fried MW et al. Ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 897903.
28. Bodenheimer HC, Jr, Lindsay KL, Davis GL et al. Tolerance and efficacy of oral ribavirin treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a multicenter trial. Hepatology 1997; 26: 4737.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
29. Pawlotsky J-M, Dahari H, Neumann AU et al. Antiviral action of ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 70314.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
30. Hoofnagle JH, Lau D, Conjeevaram H et al. Prolonged therapy of chronic hepatitis C with ribavirin. J Viral Hepat 1996; 3: 24752.[Web of Science][Medline]
31. Cattral MS, Hemming AW, Wanless IR et al. Outcome of long-term ribavirin therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Transplantation 1999; 67: 127780.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
32. Dusheiko G, Main J, Thomas H et al. Ribavirin treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of a placebo-controlled study. J Hepatol 1996; 25: 5918.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
33. NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19: 146.[Medline]
34. Tam R, Lim C, Bard J et al. Immunomodulatory activities of viramidine, a liver-targeting ribavirin prodrug, in vitro and in vivo. In: Abstracts of the Fifty-second Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Dallas, TX, 2001. Abstract 715, p. 351A. AASLD, Alexandria, VA, USA.
35.
Wu JZ, Lin C-C, Hong Z. Ribavirin, viramidine and adenosine-deaminase-catalysed drug activation: implication for nucleoside prodrug design. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52: 5436.
36. Fang C, Srivastava P, Lin C-C. Effect of ribavirin, levovirin and viramidine on liver toxicological gene expression in rats. J Appl Toxicol 2003; 23: 4539.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
37. Lin C-C, Yeh L-T, Vitarella D et al. Viramidine, a prodrug of ribavirin, shows better liver-targeting properties and safety profiles than ribavirin in animals. Antivir Chem Chemother 2003; 14: 14552.[Medline]
38. Gish R, Arora S, Nelson D et al. Safety and efficacy of viramidine in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a for treatment of hepatitis C in therapy-naïve patients. In: Abstracts of the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver, Berlin, Germany, 2004. Abstract 479, pp. 1412. EASL, Geneva, Switzerland.
39.
Gish RG, Arora S, Nelson D et al. End-of-treatment response in therapy-naive patients treated for chronic hepatitis C with viramidine in combination with pegylated interferon
-2a. In: Abstracts of the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Boston, MA, 2004. Abstract 519, p. 388A. AASLD, Alexandria, VA, USA.
40. Zha J, Garg V, McNair L et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of merimepodib and ribavirin in pegylated interferon-alfa/ribavirin/merimepodib treated genotype-1 HCV patients non-responsive to previous therapy with interferon-alfa/ribavirin. In: Abstracts of the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Boston, MA, 2004. Abstract 193, p. 250A. AASLD, Alexandria, VA, USA.
41. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Merimepodib (MMPD) in Triple Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00088504?order=1 (6 July 2005, date last accessed).
42. Kornberg A, Küpper B, Tannapfel A et al. Impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine on early recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Int Immunopharmacol 2005; 5: 10715.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. Ramos-Casals M, Font J. Mycophenolate mofetil in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Lupus 2005; 14 Suppl 1: S6472.[CrossRef][Medline]
44.
Naka K, Ikeda M, Abe K et al. Mizoribine inhibits hepatitis C virus RNA replication: effect of combination with interferon-
. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 330: 8719.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







