Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 141-142
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Correspondence

Dormancy and persistence in chronic infection: role of the general stress response in resistance to chemotherapy

Michael R. W. Brown and Anthony W. Smith

Microbiology Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

Sir,

In a recent correspondence, Dick1 usefully refers to phenotypic antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis related to dormancy, the possibility of anti-dormancy drug targets and problems of susceptibility assays. In this context it would be helpful to draw attention to the wider implications of dormancy in persistence and chronic infection in general. Such infections are commonly associated with biofilm/biomass or intracellular growth. We have proposed that growth in these situations leads to expression of the stationary phase general stress response (GSR) relatively early compared with that in conventional laboratory planktonic culture, which contributes to resistance to chemotherapy and persistence.2 Hengge-Aronis has described the GSR in the natural environment during which key bacterial structures are co-ordinately protected under the control of alternative sigma factors such as RpoS in Gram-negative bacteria.3 The cells become non-replicating, dormant and resistant to multiple physical and chemical stresses. There are numerous papers showing a general tendency for nutrient depletion and slow or no growth to be associated with antibiotic and biocide resistance.2 In retrospect, it seems probable that, in addition to the consequences of adaptation to the specific nutrient starvation and to the enforced reduction in growth rate, a major role in resistance is played by the GSR. In at least some cases, density-dependent regulation (quorum sensing) of virulence determinants, biofilm formation and RpoS expression are closely integrated.4,5

A quorum-sensing density has typically been synonymous with cessation of exponential growth and entry into stationary phase in planktonic batch culture. By definition, cell density will be high in a compact, adherent biofilm population. As a consequence, relatively small biofilm populations may demonstrate signal-driven, stationary phase survival responses, which equivalent numbers of free-growing planktonic counterparts would not. This could partially explain the general high resistance of biofilm organisms to exogenous stress. We have demonstrated expression of rpoS mRNA in sputum from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.6 Quorum-sensing signals associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms have also been identified in CF sputum.4 These data suggest that, at least in this chronic infection, quorum-sensing signal-driven and rpoS-dependent events occur.

Similarly, intracellular or intra-vacuole growth is also likely to lead to an early quorum-sensing cell density and could give rise to an early expression of density-dependent phenomena. Clearly, signal diffusion will be influenced by the nature of the intracellular boundary, or indeed the biofilm substratum. Thus, an impermeable substratum would concentrate any signal, while the degree of hydrophobicity of a vacuole boundary could influence entrapment or diffusion, depending on the chemistry of the signal. A hydrophobic signal could be trapped as aggregates/micelles within biofilm exopolymer and maintain an equilibrium concentration of monomer close to the cell, while hydrophilic molecules could diffuse away.

For many bacteria, including M. tuberculosis, co-evolution with lower-order environmental eukaryotic organisms such as protozoa, involving intra-vacuole growth, could have selected the strains now seen in the clinic even before higher animals evolved.2 This has equipped them not only for enhanced environmental survival, but also for invasion of and survival/replication in cells and tissues of higher animals. Thus, intra-amoebal and intra-macrophage growth of pathogens (involving rpoS in at least some cases) has resulted in enhanced invasiveness for macrophages and non-professional phagocytic cells, as well as increased resistance.2,7 Although circumstantial, it is interesting to note that environmental and clinical strains of a pathogen proved to be equally virulent, showing that the environmental strains already possessed the necessary virulence mechanisms.8 Thus it may prove helpful to use biofilm and protozoal models to reveal targets for new anti-dormancy drugs.

Acknowledgments

Work in the authors' laboratory is supported by Unilever Research and The Wishbone Trust.

Notes

Tel: +44-1225-323340; Fax: +44-1225-826114; E-mail: prsmrb{at}bath.ac.uk

References

1 . Dick, T. (2001). Dormant tubercle bacilli: the key to more effective TB chemotherapy? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 47, 117–8.[Free Full Text]

2 . Brown, M. R. W. & Barker, J. (1999). Unexplored reservoirs of pathogenic bacteria: protozoa and biofilms. Trends in Microbiology 7, 46–50.[Web of Science][Medline]

3 . Hengge-Aronis, R. (1999). Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2, 148–52.[Web of Science][Medline]

4 . Singh, P. K., Schaefer, A. L., Parsek, M. R., Moninger, T. O., Welsh, M. J. & Greenberg, E. P. (2000). Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms. Nature 407, 762–4.[Medline]

5 . Whiteley, M., Parsek, M. R. & Greenberg, E. P. (2000). Regulation of quorum sensing by RpoS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Bacteriology 182, 4356–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 . Foley, I., Marsh, P., Wellington, E. M., Smith, A. W. & Brown, M. R. W. (1999). General stress response master regulator rpoS is expressed in human infection: a possible role in chronicity. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 43, 164–5.[Free Full Text]

7 . Cirillo, J. D., Cirillo, S. L., Yan, L., Bermudez, L. E., Falkow, S. & Tompkins, L. S. (1999). Intracellular growth in Acanthamoeba castellani affects monocyte entry mechanisms and enhances virulence of Legionella pneumophila. Infection and Immunity 67, 4427–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 . Alonso, A., Rojo, F. & Martínez, J. L. (1999). Environmental and clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa show pathogenic and biodegradative properties irrespective of their origin. Environmental Microbiology 1, 421–30.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
L. E. Chavez de Paz, I. R. Hamilton, and G. Svensater
Oral bacteria in biofilms exhibit slow reactivation from nutrient deprivation
Microbiology, July 1, 2008; 154(7): 1927 - 1938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. L. Paterson, C. A. Muto, M. Ndirangu, P. K. Linden, B. A. Potoski, B. Capitano, R. A. Bonomo, D. C. Aron, and C. J. Donskey
Acquisition of Rectal Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus among Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated with Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Those Receiving Cefepime-Containing Antibiotic Regimens
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 465 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Canut, J. E. Martin-Herrero, A. Labora, and H. Maortua
What are the most appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A therapeutic outcomes model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2007; 60(3): 605 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P.-Y. Donnio, L. Preney, A.-L. Gautier-Lerestif, J.-L. Avril, and N. Lafforgue
Changes in staphylococcal cassette chromosome type and antibiotic resistance profile in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a French hospital over an 11 year period
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2004; 53(5): 808 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?