Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 44, 291
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Correspondence

Personalized antifungal susceptibility testing

J. Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 44: 291

Pramod M. Shah

Medizinische Klinik III, Schwerpunkt Infektiologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany

Sir,

In a recent issue of the Journal, Conti et al. concluded that so-called personalized antifungal susceptibility testing might be superior to the standardized reference method in terms of predicting the outcome of antifungal therapy. 1 They rightly point out that a wide range of factors can significantly affect the reproducibility of the test method. In this sense, antifungal agents are no different to antibacterials.

The findings of Conti et al. that the in-vitro activities of antifungal agents when determined in plasma are markedly different from those determined with a synthetic medium (RPMI 1640) come as no surprise, similar observations having been reported by several investigators in respect of antibacterials. 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 With regard to the latter, it was shown, albeit in only a few instances, that the reduced activities of these drugs in body fluids influence their clinical efficacy. 2,4 We have evaluated the activities of amphotericin B and fluconazole, alone and in combination, both in a synthetic medium (broth) and in human blood and showed that fluconazole, at certain concentrations, was fungistatic when susceptibility testing was carried out in broth, but fungicidal, at the same concentrations, when tested in blood. 8 This might explain why the results of in-vitro testing failed to predict the efficacy of fluconazole in vivo. For amphotericin B, we observed a marked decrease in its activity in blood which could be accounted for by the binding of the drug to the outer membranes of the cellular components of blood and the consequent reduction in the concentrations of free drug. 9,10

Notes

Tel: +49-69-6301-6614; Fax: +49-69-6301-7717; E-mail: shah{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de Back

References

1 . Conti, S., Fanti, F., Bertolotti, D., Dieci, E., Arseni, S., Salati, A. et al. (1999). Personalized antifungal susceptibility testing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 43 , 333–8.[Free Full Text]

2 . Helm, E. B., Munk, I., Shah, P. M. & Stille, W. (1979). Elimination of bacteria during antibacterial chemotherapy—a neglected parameter of chemotherapy. Infection 7, Suppl. 5, S492–4.

3 . Naber, K. G. (1997). Antibacterial activity of antibacterial agents in urine: an overview of applied method. In Infectiology: Urinary Tract Infections, (Bergan, T., Ed), pp. 74–83. Karger, Basel.

4 . Rees, E. N. & Elliot, T. S. J. (1998). The influence of bile on antimicrobial activity in vitro. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 41, 659–60.[Free Full Text]

5 . Shah, P. M. (1984). Bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin in human blood. Chemioterapia 8, 383–4.

6 . Shah, P. M., Helm, E. B. & Stille, W. (1990). Aktivität von Antibiotika in Körperflüssigkeiten und deren Bedeutung für die Therapie. FAC Fortschritte in Antimikrobieller und Antineoplastische Chemotherapie 92, 171–3.

7 . Shah, P. M., Ottnad-Walz, M. & Stille, W. (1983). In vitro activity of norfloxacin in synthetic media and human urine compared to that of cinoxacin, nalidixic acid and pipemidic acid. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 5, 731–4.[Medline]

8 . Bolczek, M., Shah, P. M. & Stille, W. (1992). Kinetik der fungizidie von Amphotericin B, Fluconazol und deren Kombinationen in vitro. Chemotherapie Journal 1, 111–5.

9 . Brajtburg, J., Elberg, S., Bolard, J., Kobayashi, G. S., Levy, R. A., Ostlund, R. E. et al. (1984). Interactions of plasma proteins and lipoproteins with amphotericin B. Journal of Infectious Diseases 149, 986–97.[Web of Science][Medline]

10 . Bennett, J. E. (1976). Amphotericin B binding to serum beta-lipoprotein. In Recent Advances in Medical and Veterinary Mycology, (Iwata, K., Ed), pp. 107–9. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?