Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, V.
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, V.
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 829-832
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Brief report

Use of a clinical Escherichia coli isolate expressing lux genes to study the antimicrobial pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin

Vyvyan Salisburya,*, Andreas Pfoestla, Herbert Wiesinger-Mayra, Roger Lewisa, Karen E. Bowkerb and Alasdair P. MacGowanb

a Department of Biological and Biomedical Science, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QT; b Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Escherichia coli isolate 16906 expressing luxgenes was used for real-time monitoring of moxifloxacin effects on bacterial metabolism compared with effects on cell replication. Viable counts showed concentration-dependent killing by moxifloxacin; real-time measurement of bioluminescence on the same cultures showed metabolic activity over 54 h, but with greater inhibition at 1x MIC than with higher MIC multiples. Post-antibiotic effect was longer when determined using bioluminescence than by viable counts. The control-related effective regrowth time was consistent with both methods. Bioluminescent bacteria provide a rapid and sensitive means for measuring antimicrobial effects on bacterial metabolism.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents are usually studied by observing changes in viable counts of bacteria over time for a range of drug concentrations, demonstrating the ability of the agent to prevent bacterial cell replication. 1 However, it is useful to monitor effects on metabolic activity, rather than replication, and these have been observed indirectly by adding luciferase and luciferin externally to monitor intracellular ATP of bacterial cells after treatment with antibiotics. 2

Bacterial lux genes of different origins have been expressed successfully in a number of Gram-negative bacteria and provide a simple, direct means of monitoring metabolic activity. 3 We describe transfer of lux genes into a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli, using the recombinant plasmid pLITE27. This plasmid carries a 7 kb EcoRI fragment, containing the luxCDABE operon of Xenorhabdus luminescens cloned into pUC18, allowing transcription of the lux genes from the lac promoter of pUC18. 3

Our aim was to observe the effects of moxifloxacin on E. coli metabolic activity, measured by bioluminescence, as compared with its effects on cell replication, measured by viable counts. We also wished to evaluate the use of bioluminescent bacteria to determine the post-antibiotic effect (PAE) 1 and control-related effective regrowth time (CERT) 2 of moxifloxacin.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bacteria and plasmids

E. coli 16906 was a clinical isolate from Southmead Hospital (Bristol, UK), maintained on nutrient agar. E. coli DH5(pLITE27) was a gift from F. Marincs (Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand) and was maintained on nutrient agar containing ampicillin 50 mg/L.

Antibiotics and media

Moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) was from Bayer AG (Wuppertal, Germany); ampicillin was from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Nutrient agar (NA) and iso-sensitest broth (ISB) were from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK). Luria- Bertani (LB) broth and LB agar 4 were supplemented throughout with ampicillin at 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L, respectively.

Electroporation of E. coli 16906

A single colony of E. coli DH5 (pLITE27) was transferred to 10 mL LB broth and incubated at 37°C overnight with shaking. Rapid preparation of pLITE27 plasmid DNA was carried out. 4

The recipient E. coli 16906 was grown overnight in 2 mL LB broth without ampicillin and washed cells were transformed with pLITE27, 5 using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA).

Concentration-dependent killing

The MIC of moxifloxacin for E. coli 16906 (pLITE27) was determined by broth macrodilution. 6 Ten millilitres ISB plus ampicillin at 50 mg/L were inoculated with a single colony of E. coli 16906 (pLITE27) and incubated at 37°C overnight with shaking; 0.5 mL of the overnight culture was added to each of five bottles of 50 mL of pre-warmed ISB (without ampicillin). Bioluminescence was measured by removing 1 mL samples to a luminometer (BioOrbit 1250; BioOrbit, Turku, Finland); samples were held at 37°C and mixed (LKB Wallace 1250-105 Mixer; Milton Keynes, UK) during measurement. Viable counts were carried out using a spiral plater (Autoplate Model 3000; Spiral Biotech, Bethesda, MD, USA) and plated onto NA plus ampicillin 50 mg/L plus 1% MgCl 2.

At time zero, 1 x MIC, 4 x MIC, 10 x MIC or 16 x MIC of moxifloxacin were added to each of four bottles, leaving the fifth as a control. The bottles were incubated at 37°C with shaking for 54 h, sampling for bioluminescence and viable counts at hourly intervals for 9 h and then at 24, 48 and 54 h.

Measurement of bacterial regrowth

Ten millilitres ISB plus ampicillin 50 mg/L were inoculated with a single colony of E. coli 16906 (pLITE27) and incubated at 37°C overnight with shaking; 0.1 mL of overnight culture was added to three bottles of 10 mL of ISB (without ampicillin). Bioluminescence and viable counts were measured and, at time zero, 4 x MIC and 10 x MIC of moxifloxacin were then added to each of two bottles, leaving the third as a control. After incubation at 37°C with shaking f 30 min, 1 mL samples from each bottle were microfuged for 1 min. The bacterial pellet was washed in 1 mL pre-warmed ISB, microfuged again and finally re-suspended in 1 mL fresh pre-warmed ISB; 0.5 mL of this suspension was added to 50 mL of pre-warmed ISB (without ampicillin) and incubated at 37°C with shaking. Samples were immediately removed for bioluminescence determination and viable counting, and thereafter these measurements were taken at half-hour intervals for 12 h.

PAE 1 and mCERT 2 were calculated from the regrowth curves, by calculating the difference in time taken by treated and untreated cultures to increase one log above the resuspended concentration (PAE) or the initial concentration (mCERT).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Electroporation

Approximately 120 colonies grew on LB agar + ampicillin 100 mg/L; all emitted visible light; single purified colonies showed identical API profiles to E. coli 16906. Transformants showed strong constitutive light emission when growing exponentially in ISB at 37°C. Viable counts and bioluminescence readings over 24 h showed no significant difference with and without ampicillin selection, indicating that the plasmid was stable in the absence of ampicillin. Addition of hypochlorite to bioluminescent cultures or removal of cells by filtering gave luminometer readings of 0 mV, indicating that bioluminescence readings were from metabolizing cells.

Concentration-dependent killing

The MIC of moxifloxacin for E. coli 16906 (pLITE27) was 0.06 mg/L. Viable counts (Figure 1a) indicated concentration-dependent killing. However, bioluminescence measurements (Figure 1b) showed more inhibition with 1 x MIC moxifloxacin, compared with four-, 10- and 16-fold higher concentrations. The viable counts in Figure 1 also indicated that no replicating cells remained after 7 h for 16 x MIC and 24 h for 4 x MIC and 10 x MIC. In direct contrast to this, bioluminescence measurements showed evidence of persistent metabolic activity after 54 h for all concentrations of moxifloxacin.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Activity of moxifloxacin against E. coli 16906 (pLITE 27). Antibiotic concentrations used were 1 x MIC ({blacktriangleup}), 4 x MIC ({blacktriangledown}), 10 x MIC ({blacklozenge}), 16 x MIC () and antibiotic-free control ({blacksquare}). (a) Measured by viable counts; (b) measured by bioluminescence.

 
Bacterial regrowth after exposure to moxifloxacin

Regrowth occurred after 30 min exposure to 4 x MIC and 10 x MIC of moxifloxacin followed by washing and diluting 1:100 in fresh broth (Figure 2). For 10 x MIC the viable counts dropped between 1 and 2.5 h, which was not seen in bioluminescence measurements. The PAE was method dependent for 4 x MIC (95 min with viable counts, 150 min with bioluminescence) and for 10 x MIC (100 min with viable counts, 390 min with bioluminescence).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Regrowth of E. coli 16906 (pLITE 27) after moxifloxacin treatment for 30 min and 1:100 dilution in fresh broth. Antibiotic concentrations used were 4 x MIC ({blacktriangleup}), 10 x MIC ({blacktriangledown}) and antibiotic-free control ({blacksquare}). (a) Measured by viable counts; (b) measured by bioluminescence.

 
However, the CERT values for both methods of measurement were similar (Figure 2). The CERT with 4 x MIC was 160 min with viable counts and 150 min with bioluminescence. At 10 x MIC it was 380 min measured by bioluminescence and 370 min measured by viable counts.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although bioluminescent bacteria have been used to monitor antimicrobials, 7 they have not previously been used to determine PAE or CERT. Our results suggest that clinical isolates expressing lux genes have potential use for rapid, real-time evaluation of drug dosage regimens and that CERT determined by this method is an estimate of recovery of both bacterial metabolism and replication.

Moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) is an 8-methoxyquinolone 8 that showed concentration-dependent killing on colony counts of E. coli 16906 (pLITE27). In contrast, its effect on the bioluminescence of this isolate was not concentration dependent: 1 x MIC resulted in a much greater inhibition of metabolic activity than higher concentrations. For clinical isolates, producing virulence factors, this has relevance to treatment of established infections. A low concentration of moxifloxacin which inhibits metabolism and therefore virulence factor production may be more satisfactory than higher dosage regimens. This type of ` Eagle effect' 9 has been previously noted with ciprofloxacin. 10 It may be caused by uncoupling of metabolism from transcriptional control at high concentrations.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Jo Smoldon, Nigel Line and Dr Robert Jackson for technical assistance.


    Notes
 
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-117-9656261; Fax: +44-117-9763871; E-mail: vyv.salisbury{at}uwe.ac.uk Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . MacKenzie, F. M. & Gould, I. M. (1993). The post-antibiotic effect. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 32 , 519 - 37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 . Hanberger, H., Svensson, E., Nilsson, L. E. & Nilsson, M. (1995). Control-related effective regrowth time and post-antibiotic effect of meropenem on Gram-negative bacteria studied by bioluminescence and viable counts. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 35 , 585 - 92.

3 . Marincs, F. & White, D. W. R. (1994). Immobilization of Escherichia coli expressing the lux genes of Xenorhabdus luminescens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60 , 3862 - 3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 . Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T (1989). Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. CSH Press, New York, USA.

5 . Keen, N. T., Shen, H. & Cooksey, D. A. (1992). Introduction of cloned DNA into plant pathogenic bacteria. In Molecular Plant Pathology, a Practical Approach (Gurr, S. J., McPherson, M. J. & Bowles, D. J., Eds), pp. 45- 50. IRL Press, Oxford.

6 . Phillips, I., Andrews, J. M., Bridson, E., Cooke, E. M., Holt, H.A., Spencer, R. C. et al . (1991). A guide to sensitivity testing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 27 , Suppl. D, 1 - 48.[Free Full Text]

7 . Loimaranta, V., Tenovuo, J, Koivisto, L. & Karp, M. (1998). Generation of bioluminescent Streptococcus mutans and its usage in rapid analysis of the efficacy of antimicrobial compounds. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42 , 1906 - 10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 . Woodcock, J. M., Andrews, J. M., Boswell, F. J., Brenwald, N. P. & Wise, R. (1997). In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new 8-fluoroquinolone. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41 , 101 - 6.[Abstract]

9 . Eagle, H. & Musselman, A. D. (1948). The rate of bactericidal action of penicillin in vitro as a function of its concentration, and its paradoxically reduced activity at high concentrations against certain organisms. Journal of Experimental Medicine 88 , 99 - 131.[Abstract]

10 . Smith, J. T. (1986). The mode of action of 4-quinolones and possible mechanisms of resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 18 , Suppl. D, 21 - 9.

Received 2 November 1998; returned 22 December 1998; revised 10 February 1999; accepted 3 March 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. M. S. Thorn, S. M. Nelson, and J. Greenman
Use of a Bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain within an In Vitro Microbiological System, as a Model of Wound Infection, To Assess the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Wound Dressings by Monitoring Light Production
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2007; 51(9): 3217 - 3224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
S. Qazi, B. Middleton, S. H. Muharram, A. Cockayne, P. Hill, P. O'Shea, S. R. Chhabra, M. Camara, and P. Williams
N-Acylhomoserine Lactones Antagonize Virulence Gene Expression and Quorum Sensing in Staphylococcus aureus
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2006; 74(2): 910 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. N. H. Marques, V. C. Salisbury, J. Greenman, K. E. Bowker, and S. M. Nelson
Discrepancy between viable counts and light output as viability measurements, following ciprofloxacin challenge of self-bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2005; 56(4): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. M. Martin, J. T. Hancock, V. Salisbury, and R. Harrison
Role of Xanthine Oxidoreductase as an Antimicrobial Agent
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2004; 72(9): 4933 - 4939.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. N. A. Qazi, S. E. Harrison, T. Self, P. Williams, and P. J. Hill
Real-Time Monitoring of Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus Replication
J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2004; 186(4): 1065 - 1077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
I. I. Vlasova, T. V. Asrieli, E. M. Gavrilova, and V. S. Danilov
New Approach for Specific Determination of Antibiotics by Use of Luminescent Escherichia coli and Immune Serum
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2004; 70(2): 1245 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Kadurugamuwa, L. V. Sin, J. Yu, K. P. Francis, R. Kimura, T. Purchio, and P. R. Contag
Rapid Direct Method for Monitoring Antibiotics in a Mouse Model of Bacterial Biofilm Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2003; 47(10): 3130 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
H. M. Alloush, V. Salisbury, R. J. Lewis, and A. P. MacGowan
Pharmacodynamics of linezolid in a clinical isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae genetically modified to express lux genes
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 511 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. J. Lewis, C. Torkornoo, C. N. H. Marques, S. M. Nelson, and V. C. Salisbury
Inhibition of bacteria on agar surfaces by vapour phase triclosan
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2003; 52(2): 314 - 315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. T. Hancock, V. Salisbury, M. C. Ovejero-Boglione, R. Cherry, C. Hoare, R. Eisenthal, and R. Harrison
Antimicrobial Properties of Milk: Dependence on Presence of Xanthine Oxidase and Nitrite
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2002; 46(10): 3308 - 3310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. J. Beard, V. Salisbury, R. J. Lewis, J. A. Sharpe, and A. P. MacGowan
Expression of lux Genes in a Clinical Isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Using Bioluminescence To Monitor Gemifloxacin Activity
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2002; 46(2): 538 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, V.
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, V.
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?