Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 645-649
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Anti-pneumococcal activity of gatifloxacin compared with other quinolone and non-quinolone agents
a Departments of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033; b Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An agar dilution MIC method was used to test the activity of gatifloxacin, a new broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, compared with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, amoxycillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone and clarithromycin against 71 penicillin-susceptible, 81 penicillin-intermediate and 55 penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Quinolone activity was unaffected by penicillin susceptibility, with MIC 50/MIC 90s (mg/L) of 0.25/0.5 for gatifloxacin; 1/2 for ciprofloxacin; 1/2 for levofloxacin; 0.25/0.5 for sparfloxacin; 0.125/0.25 for trovafloxacin. ß-Lactam and clarithromycin MICs rose with those of penicillin G; MIC 50/MIC 90 values (mg/L) for penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate and -resistant strains were: 0.03/0.06, 0.25/1, 2/4 for penicillin G; 0.03/0.03, 0.125/1, 2/4 for amoxycillin; 0.03/0.125, 0.5/4, 8/16 for cefuroxime; 0.03/0.03, 0.25/0.5, 2/4 for ceftriaxone; 0.03/0.06, 0.03/>64, 1/>64 for clarithromycin. Time-kill testing of four penicillin-susceptible, four -intermediate and four -resistant strains showed that levofloxacin at the MIC, gatifloxacin and sparfloxacin at 2 x MIC, and trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin at 4 x MIC, were bactericidal (99.9% killing) for all strains after 12 h and 24 h. By contrast, amoxycillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone showed bactericidal activity after 24 h against all strains at 4, 8 and 4 x MIC, respectively. Against ten organisms with clarithromycin MICs of 0.03-4.0 mg/L, clarithromycin was bactericidal against seven strains at 8 x MIC after 24 h. Quinolones showed more rapid killing at lower concentrations and earlier time periods than did ß-lactams and clarithromycin.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The incidence of pneumococci resistant to penicillin G and other ß-lactam and non-ß-lactam compounds has increased worldwide at an alarming rate. Major foci of infection currently include South Africa, Spain, central and eastern Europe and parts of Asia. 1 ,2 ,3 ,4 In the USA a recent survey has shown an increase in resistance to penicillin from <5% before 1989 (including <0.02% of isolates with MICs
2.0 mg/L) to 6.6% in
1991-1992 (with 1.3% of isolates with MICs
2.0 mg/L).
5 In another more recent survey,
6 23.6% (360) of 1527 clinically significant
pneumococcal isolates were not susceptible to penicillin. It is also important to note the high
rates of isolation of penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci (approximately
30%) in middle ear fluids from patients with refractory otitis media, compared with other
isolation sites.
7 There is an urgent need of oral compounds for outpatient treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci. 2 ,3 ,4 8 Available quinolones such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin yield moderate in-vitro activity against pneumococci, with MICs clustering around the breakpoints. 4 ,9 ,10 ,11 Gatifloxacin (AM-1155, CG 5501) is a new broad-spectrum 8-methoxyquinolone which shares with sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin a methyl piperazinyl side-chain at position 7 and a cyclopropyl substituent at position 1. 12 ,13 ,14 ,15 ,16 ,17 Preliminary MIC studies with small numbers of strains have shown that gatifloxacin has good activity against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. 12 ,13 ,14 ,15 ,16 ,17
This study expands studies of the anti-pneumococcal activity of gatifloxacin by comparing its activity with that of four other quinolones, three ß-lactams and clarithromycin against 207 penicillin-susceptible, intermediate resistant and -resistant pneumococci. Drugs were chosen to represent a range of oral quinolone and non-quinolone agents, and one parenteral agent, which might be indicated for empirical treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. The activity of the above compounds against 12 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci was also investigated by broth MIC and time- kill methodology.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacteria
For agar dilution MICs, the pneumococci comprised 71 penicillin-susceptible (MIC
0.06
mg/L), 81 penicillin-intermediate (MIC 0.125-1.0 mg/L) and 55 penicillin- resistant (MIC
2.0-16.0 mg/L) strains. All susceptible, and some intermediate and resistant strains, were recent
USA
isolates. The remainder of the intermediate and resistant strains were isolated in South Africa,
Spain, France, central and eastern Europe and Korea. For time-kill studies, four
penicillin-susceptible, four -intermediate and four -resistant strains were tested.
Antimicrobials and MIC testing
Gatifloxacin powder was obtained from Bristol-Myers Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Wallingford, CT, USA) and other antimicrobials were obtained from their respective manufacturers. Two hundred and seven strains were tested by agar dilution methodology as described previously, 3 ,4 on Mueller-Hinton agar (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, USA) supplemented with 5% sheep blood. Broth dilution MICs for 12 strains were determined according to NCCLS recommendations 18 with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% lysed defibrinated horse blood. Standard quality control strains, including Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, were included in each run of agar and broth dilution MICs. All strains used in this study have been subcultured many times and therefore do not require CO 2 for growth. All incubations were therefore in ambient air.
Time- kill testing
For time-kill studies, glass tubes containing 5 mL cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) plus 5% lysed horse blood with doubling antibiotic concentrations were inoculated with 5 x 105 to 5 x 106 cfu/mL and incubated at 35°C in a shaking water bath. Antibiotic concentrations were chosen to comprise three doubling dilutions above and three dilutions below the agar dilution MIC. Growth controls with inoculum but no antibiotic were included with each experiment. 19 ,20
Lysed horse blood was prepared as described previously. 19 ,20 The bacterial inoculum was prepared by diluting a 16 h broth culture (medium as above) in the same medium. Dilutions required to obtain the correct inoculum (5 x 105 -5 x 106 cfu/mL) were determined by prior viability studies with each strain.
To inoculate each tube of serially diluted antibiotic, 50 µL of diluted inoculum was delivered by pipette beneath the surface of the broth. Tubes were then vortexed and plated for viable counts within 10 min. The original inoculum was determined by using the untreated growth control. Only tubes containing an initial inoculum within the range of 5 x 105-5 x 106 cfu/mL were acceptable. 19 ,20
Viable counts of antibiotic-containing suspensions were determined according to standard methodology, by plating ten-fold dilutions of 0.1 mL aliquots from each tube in sterile Mueller- Hinton broth on to plates of trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (BBL Microbiology Systems). Recovery plates were incubated for up to 72 h. Colony counts were performed on plates yielding 30- 300 colonies. The lower limit of sensitivity of colony counts was 300 cfu/mL. All incubation was in ambient air without CO 2.
Time-kill assays were analysed by determining the number of strains which yielded a change in
log
10 cfu/mL of -1, -2 and -3 at 0, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h, compared
with counts at time 0 h. Antimicrobials were considered bactericidal at the lowest concentration
that reduced the original inoculum by
3 log
10 cfu/mL (99.9%) at each of the time periods, and bacteriostatic if the
inoculum was reduced by 0-3 log
10 cfu/mL. With the sensitivity threshold and inocula used in these studies, no
problems were encountered in delineating 99.9% killing, when present. The problem of
bacterial carryover was addressed as described previously.
19
,20 For clarithromycin time- kill testing, only strains with
MICs
4.0 mg/L were tested. Time-kill experiments were performed in duplicate and
arithmetic means of results taken. In all cases, results of repeat testing were practically identical.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MICs are presented in Table I. Quinolone MICs were independent of those of penicillin G, while those of ß-lactams (amoxycillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone) and clarithromycin rose with those of penicillin G. Trovafloxacin had the lowest quinolone MICs, followed by gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.
|
Microbroth MICs for the 12 individual strains examined by time-kill were all the same as those seen by inspection of time-kill results with 11 strains and within one dilution with one strain. Microbroth and time-kill MICs for individual strains were also within one dilution of those obtained by agar dilution testing. Time-kill results (Table II) showed that levofloxacin at the MIC, gatifloxacin and sparfloxacin at 2 x MIC and trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin at 4 x MIC, were bactericidal (99.9% killing) for all strains after 12 h and 24 h. By contrast, amoxycillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone showed bactericidal activity after 24 h against all strains at 4, 8 and 4 x MIC, respectively. Against ten organisms with clarithromycin MICs of 0.03 - 4.0 mg/L, clarithromycin was bactericidal against seven strains at 8 x MIC. Quinolones showed more rapid killing at lower concentrations and earlier time periods than did ß-lactams and clarithromycin. In some strains, regrowth occurred at the MIC after 24 h: this effect disappeared at 2- 4 x MIC.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gatifloxacin is a new 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone with a wide spectrum of activity against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. In a recent study, Wise and co-workers 16 have reported that gatifloxacin inhibited 90% of Enterobacteriaceae at
0.5 mg/L, exceptions being Enterobacter (MIC
90 2 mg/L) and Serratia spp. (MIC
90 4 mg/L). MIC
90s for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
and Acinetobacter spp. were 16, 4 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Haemophilus
influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis strains were all inhibited by gatifloxacin at
0.125 mg/L. Gatifloxacin was active against staphylococci (MIC
90 2 mg/L), including methicillin-resistant strains (MIC
90 4 mg/L), which were generally ciprofloxacin resistant. Enterococcus faecalis was generally two to four times more susceptible to gatifloxacin or trovafloxacin than to
ciprofloxacin. Gatifloxacin was very active against Bacteroides fragilis (MIC
90 0.25 mg/L), chlamydia (MIC
0.125 mg/L) and Mycobacterium
tuberculosis(MIC
0.5 mg/L). Bauernfeind
17 reported MICs similar to those of Wise and colleagues;
16 additionally, gatifloxacin MICs were found to be
comparable to those of moxifloxacin (Bay 12-8039) and clinafloxacin.
Several workers have reported that gatifloxacin is very active against a small number of
pneumococcal strains tested, with MIC
50s of 0.125 - 0.39 mg/L and MIC
90s of 0.2 - 0.5 mg/L.
12
,13
,15
,16
,17
Our findings of MIC
50 and MIC
90 values of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L respectively, with a larger number of strains confirm
the earlier reports. Time-kill studies, which have not been reported previously, showed that at
0.5 mg/L gatifloxacin was bactericidal after 12 h against all pneumococcal strains tested.
Lower MICs of amoxycillin and ceftriaxone against penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci, and raised clarithromycin MICs in the latter two groups, have been described before. 4 ,21 Kill kinetics of other quinolones tested, including slightly more rapid killing by levofloxacin compared with other quinolones, have been described previously. 22 ,23
Nakashima and co-workers 14 have reported gatifloxacin C max values (mg/L) in healthy human volunteers of 0.873, 1.71, 3.35 and 5.41 after single oral doses of 100, 200, 400 and 600 mg, respectively. AUC values (mg·h/L) after the four doses were 7.0, 14.5, 32.4 and 53.5, respectively. Serum concentrations reached a peak between 1 and 2 h. With the above pharmacokinetic data taken into consideration together with the MIC and time-kill results obtained in our study, gatifloxacin shows promise in treatment of infections caused by penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Clinical studies will be necessary to validate these in-vitro findings.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Laboratories, Wallingford, CT, USA.
| Notes |
|---|
* Corresponding author: Tel +1-717-531-5113; Fax +1-717-531-7953; E-mail: pappelbaum{at}psghs.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 . Appelbaum, P. C. (1992). Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae an overview. Clinical Infectious Diseases 15 , 77 83.[Web of Science][Medline]
2 . Friedland, I. R. & Istre, G. R. (1992). Management of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 11 , 433 5.[Web of Science][Medline]
3 . Jacobs, M. R. (1992). Treatment and diagnosis of infections caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clinical Infectious Diseases 15 , 119 27.[Web of Science][Medline]
4 . Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1995). Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci. Reviews of Medical Microbiology 6 , 77 93.
5
.
Breiman, R. F., Butler, J. C., Tenover, F. C., Elliott, J. A. & Facklam, R. R. (1994). Emergence of drug-resistant pneumococcal infections in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association
271
, 1831
5.
6 . Doern, G. V., Brueggemann, A., Holley, H. P. & Rauch, A. M. (1996). Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40 , 1208 13.[Abstract]
7 . Block, S. L., Harrison, C. J., Hedrick, J. A., Tyler, R. D., Smith, R. A., Keegan, E. et al. (1995). Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute otitis media: risk factors, susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial management. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 14 , 751 9.[Web of Science][Medline]
8
.
Friedland, I. R. & McCracken, G. H. (1994). Management of infections caused by
antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. New England Journal of Medicine
331
, 377
82.
9
.
Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1995). Activity of CP 99,219
compared to DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin,
sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
35
, 230
2.
10
.
Spangler, S. K., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1992). Susceptibilities of
penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to RP 59500,
vancomycin, erythromycin, PD 131628, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, WIN 57273, ofloxacin and
ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
36
, 856
9.
11
.
Spangler, S. K., Jacobs, M. R., Pankuch, G. A. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1993).
Susceptibility of 170 penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant pneumococci to six oral
cephalosporins, four quinolones, desacetylcefotaxime, Ro 23-9424 and RP 67829. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
31
, 273
80.
12
.
Hosaka, M., Kinoshita, S., Toyama, A., Otsuki, M. & Nishino, T. (1995).
Antibacterial properties of AM-1155, a new 8-methoxy quinolone. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
36, 293
301.
13
.
Hosaka, M., Yasue, T., Fukuda, H., Tomizawa, H., Aoyama, H. & Hirai, K. (1992). In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of AM-1155, a new
6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
36
, 2108
17.
14 . Nakashima, M., Uematsu, T., Kosuge, K., Kusajima, H., Ooie, T., Masuda, Y. et al. (1995). Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of AM-1155, a new 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone, in humans. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 39 , 2635 40.[Abstract]
15
.
Wakabayashi, E. & Mitsuhashi, S. (1994). In vitro antibacterial activity
of AM-1155, a novel 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
38
, 594
601.
16
.
Wise, R., Brenwald, N. P., Andrews, J. M. & Boswell, F. (1997). The activity of
the methylpiperazinyl fluoroquinolone CG 5501: a comparison with other fluoroquinolones. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
39
, 447
52.
17
.
Bauernfeind, A. (1997). Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the
quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and
ciprofloxacin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
40, 639
51.
18 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1997). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow AerobicallyFourth Edition: Approved Standard M7-A4. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
19
.
Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1994). Study of comparative
antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin
and vancomycin by using time- kill methodology. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
38
, 2065
72.
20 . Pankuch, G. A., Lichtenberger, C., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1996). Antipneumococcal activities of RP 59500 (quinupristin- dalfopristin), penicillin G, erythromycin, and sparfloxacin determined by MIC and rapid time- kill methodologies. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40 , 1653 6.[Abstract]
21
.
Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1995). Comparative activity
of ampicillin, amoxycillin, amoxycillin/ clavulanate and cefotaxime against 189
penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
35
, 883
8.
22 . Visalli, M. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1996). MIC and time- kill study of activities of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, cefotaxime, imipenem, and vancomycin against nine penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40 , 362 6.[Abstract]
23 . Visalli, M. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1997). Antipneumococcal activity of BAY 12-8039, a new quinolone, compared with activities of three other quinolones and four oral ß-lactams. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41 , 2786 9.[Abstract]
Received 29 May 1998; returned 22 September 1998; revised 26 October 1998; accepted 30 January 1999
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kosowska-Shick, L. M. Ednie, P. McGhee, and P. C. Appelbaum Comparative Antipneumococcal Activities of Sulopenem and Other Drugs Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2009; 53(6): 2239 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Clark, K. Smith, L. Ednie, T. Bogdanovich, B. Dewasse, P. McGhee, and P. C. Appelbaum In Vitro Activity of DC-159a, a New Broad-Spectrum Fluoroquinolone, Compared with That of Other Agents against Drug-Susceptible and -Resistant Pneumococci Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2008; 52(1): 77 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kosowska-Shick, K. Credito, G. A. Pankuch, G. Lin, B. Bozdogan, P. McGhee, B. Dewasse, D.-R. Choi, J. M. Ryu, and P. C. Appelbaum Antipneumococcal Activity of DW-224a, a New Quinolone, Compared to Those of Eight Other Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2006; 50(6): 2064 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Browne, B. Bozdogan, C. Clark, L. M. Kelly, L. Ednie, K. Kosowska, B. Dewasse, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum Antipneumococcal Activity of DK-507k, a New Quinolone, Compared with the Activities of 10 Other Agents Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2003; 47(12): 3815 - 3824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Trampuz, G. Laifer, M. Wenk, Z. Rajacic, and W. Zimmerli Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in a Granulocyte-Rich Exudate Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2002; 46(11): 3630 - 3633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ince and D. C. Hooper Mechanisms and Frequency of Resistance to Gatifloxacin in Comparison to AM-1121 and Ciprofloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2001; 45(10): 2755 - 2764. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Honeybourne, D. Banerjee, J. Andrews, and R. Wise Concentrations of gatifloxacin in plasma and pulmonary compartments following a single 400 mg oral dose in patients undergoing fibre-optic bronchoscopy J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2001; 48(1): 63 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Coyle, G. W. Kaatz, and M. J. Rybak Activities of Newer Fluoroquinolones against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2001; 45(6): 1654 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Perrig, F. Acosta, M. Cottagnoud, C. M. Gerber, M. G. Tauber, and P. Cottagnoud Efficacy of gatifloxacin alone and in combination with cefepime against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in a rabbit meningitis model and in vitro J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 701 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Fung-Tomc, E. Gradelski, L. Valera, B. Kolek, and D. P. Bonner Comparative Killing Rates of Fluoroquinolones and Cell Wall-Active Agents Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2000; 44(5): 1377 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Pankuch, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum Postantibiotic Effects of Gatifloxacin against Gram-Positive and -Negative Organisms Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1999; 43(10): 2574 - 2575. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

