Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 273-276
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Brief reports

Prevalence and degree of expression of the carbapenemase gene (cfiA) among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis in Nottingham, UK

R. Edwards*, C. V. Hawkyard, M. T. Garvey and D. Greenwood

Division of Microbiology and PHLS Laboratory, University Hospital, Queen':s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The carbapenemase gene (cfiA) was detected in 12 (6.9%) out of 175 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis from Nottingham, three times the frequency reported from France. Only one gene copy was present in all cases. Eleven (6.3%) of the cfiA-positive isolates were susceptible to imipenem or meropenem (MIC < 8 mg/L); strains of this type have the potential to convert to high-level resistance. One isolate (0.6%) displayed resistance to both carbapenem antibiotics and was associated with specific carbapenemase activity six times that of the sensitive isolates.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The carbapenem antibiotics are useful therapeutic agents for infections associated with Bacteroides fragilis owing to their stability to common ß-lactamases. However, a minority of clinically significant B. fragilis strains (c. 3%) produce carbapenemases. 1 These are typically metallo-ß-lactamases that are inhibited by ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) and are products of the cfiA gene, which has been cloned and sequenced. 2

The cfiA gene may be `silent' or expressed to various degrees resulting in a wide range of levels of carbapenem resistance. 3 Most isolates appear sensitive to carbapenems on conventional testing, 4 but some can convert to high-level resistance following antibiotic pressure. 3,5 We have examined the prevalence, copy number and degree of expression of the cfiA gene among clinical isolates of B. fragilis in Nottingham.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bacterial strains

One hundred and seventy-five randomly selected, clinically significant B. fragilis isolates were collected during 1996 and 1997 from Nottingham PHL. Isolates were identified by conventional testing or the Rapid ID 32 A system (bioMérieux, Basingstoke, UK). B. fragilis NCTC 9344 (carbapenem-sensitive) and B. fragilis TAL3636 (metallo-ß-lactamase-producer 6) were included as controls.

Antibiotic titrations

Antibiotics were incorporated into Brain Heart Infusion agar supplemented with yeast extract (5 g/L), haemin (5 mg/L) and menadione (1 mg/L). Inocula of 106 organisms were delivered on to the agar surface and the MIC was taken as the lowest antibiotic concentration to inhibit growth completely after 48 h of incubation at 37°C in an anaerobic cabinet.

Detection of the cfiA gene

PCR was used to screen isolates for the cfiA gene. Supernates of bacterial cells boiled in water were used as tem-plate DNA. Reaction mixtures each contained 5 µL of 10x reaction buffer (Boehringer Mannheim Lewis, UK), 1 µL (2.5 mM) each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP (Boehringer Mannheim), 1 µL (35 pmoles) of each primer, 5 µL of DNA preparation, 33 µL of sterile water and 1 U Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). The primers were 5'-TCCATGCTTTTCCCTGTCGCAGTTAT (sequence of nucleotides 557–582) and 5'-GGGCTATG G CTTTGAAGTGC (the complementary sequence of nucleotides 1266- 1285). 2 The reactions were incubated for 40 cycles in a programmable heating block (Techne, Duxford, UK) for 1 min at 92°C, 2 min at 50°C and 2 min at 72°C. PCR products were visualized on agarose gels containing ethidium bromide under UV light and their sizes were compared with those of HaeIII digest markers (NBL Gene Sciences, Cramlington, UK) and the product generated from B. fragilis TAL3636.

Southern blotting and hybridization with a cfiA-specific probe were used to confirm the PCR results and to determine the copy number of the cfiA gene. The protocol described by Ausubel et al. 7 was used. Isolated genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzymes EcoRI or AvaI (Boehringer Mannheim), electrophoresed and transferred to a Hybond N+ membrane (Boehringer Mannheim) and probed with a digoxigenin-labelled probe obtained by random priming of the 700 bp fragment from B. fragilis TAL3636. Hybridization was performed at 42°C overnight and bound probe was visualized with CDP star (Boehringer Mannheim) and exposure to a Kodak X-OMAT film (Sigma, Poole, UK).

Biological assay

Iso-Sensitest agar (Unipath, Basingstoke, UK) was inoculated with the indicator strain Escherichia coli NCTC 10418 to achieve semi-confluent growth. Cell extracts were prepared as previously described, 4 freeze dried and reconstituted in buffer to provide four-fold concentrates. Concentrated cell extracts (30 µL), imipenem 25 mg/L (10 µL, final concentration of 5 mg/L) and phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (10 µL) were dispensed into wells in the agar. After aerobic incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the diameters of zones of inhibition were compared with those of wells containing cell extract of B. fragilis NCTC 9344, and with the buffer replaced with EDTA (final concentration 2 mM).

Spectrophotometry

Metallo-ß-lactamase activity was detected by a change in absorbance at 299 nm of a mixture of concentrated cell extract (0.2 mL), imipenem (0.2 mL; 250 mg/L) and phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (0.6 mL) with and without EDTA (final concentration 2 mM) over 1 h at 37°C. Specific activities (nmol imipenem hydrolysed/min/mg protein) were calculated from changes in absorbance and the protein content of the cell extracts was measured with a Sigma protein assay kit.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MICs of imipenem for the isolates ranged from 0.03 to 16 mg/L; 21 isolates showed reduced susceptibility to imipenem (MICs 0.5- 2 mg/L), and one isolate displayed resistance (MIC 16 mg/L).

The 700 bp cfiA gene was detected in 11 isolates by PCR; an additional strain, B. fragilis Q8, showed products of c. 500 bp (Figure 1a). Southern blotting revealed the presence of single copies of the gene in all these 12 strains (Figure 1b).




View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure. (a) PCR products displayed on an agarose gel showing the presence of the cfiA gene in selected isolates of B. fragilis. Lane 1, isolate T2; 2, isolate Q8; 3, DNA-free control; 4, isolate F10; 5, isolate E9; 6, isolate A1; 7, B. fragilis NCTC 9344 (negative control); 8, isolate J1; 9, B. fragilis TAL3636 (positive control); 10, size markers (HaeIII digest). (b) The presence of the cfiA gene in selected isolates of B. fragilis shown by hybridization with a cfiA-specific probe after digestion of genomic DNA with EcoRI. Lane 1, isolate J1; 2, B. fragilis TAL3636 (positive control); 3, isolate Q8; 4, isolate A1; 5, isolate F10; 6, B. fragilis NCTC 9344 (negative control).

 
For ten of the cfiA-positive isolates, the MICs of the carbapenems were 0.03- 2 mg/L (Table). The MICs of imipenem and meropenem for B. fragilis Q8 were 2 mg/L and 16 mg/L, respectively. B. fragilis T2 was resistant to both carbapenem antibiotics (MIC of imipenem, 16 mg/L; MIC of meropenem, 64 mg/L).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table. Carbapenem susceptibilities and metallo-ß-lactamase production of B. fragilisisolates that possess the cfiA gene
 
Metallo-ß-lactamase activity was detected in eight of the 12 cfiA-positive strains (Table). With B. fragilis J1, imipenem hydrolysis was detected only in the biological assay. The specific activities of six of the isolates (imipenem MIC, 1 or 2 mg/L) were between 1.9 and 8.2 nmol imipenem hydrolysed/min/mg protein; that of the resistant isolate was 49.4 nmol imipenem hydrolysed/min/mg protein. MICs of imipenem for the four carbapenemase-negative strains were 0.03–1 mg/L.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Twelve (6.9%) of the 175 clinical isolates of B. fragilis from Nottingham possessed the cfiA gene; substantially more than reported in France (2.4%). 8 All but one of the isolates would be classed as sensitive by conventional criteria (imipenem MIC <8 mg/L). However, for most of these isolates the MIC was at least ten times that of fully sensitive isolates. The proportion of cfiA-positive isolates that were carbapenem-sensitive (6.3% of total) was higher than that reported in France (1.6%). 8 These isolates have the potential to convert to a high level of metallo-ß-lactamase expression and resistance owing to the presence of an insertion element carrying an efficient promoter immediately upstream of the cfiA gene. 3,9 Only one isolate (0.6%) was resistant to both imipenem and meropenem; it exhibited a specific activity at least six times that of the more sensitive strains. Similar low rates of resistance have been found in USA and France, 8 although in Japan, where imipenem is widely used, rates of 5.9% have been reported. 10

ß-Lactamase activity among cfiA-positive isolates did not appear to be dependent on the gene copy number as all the isolates tested possessed only one copy. Podglajen et al. 9 identified three strains with multiple cfiA gene copies among 11 cfiA-positive strains, although the copy number showed no correlation with the degree of resistance.

Metallo-ß-lactamase activity was not detected in one third of the cfiA-positive isolates, indicating that the cfiA status is a more reliable indicator of these problem strains. The prevalence of carbapenemase production (4.6%) has not risen markedly in Nottingham since 1985, when carbapenemases were detected in 3% of B. fragilis isolates. 1


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant from the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. We thank Dr A. Cockayne for his advice and help with the molecular methods. Preliminary findings of this study were presented at the Eighth International Congress on Infectious Diseases, Boston, MA, USA, May 1998.


    Notes
 
* Tel: +44-115-9249924, ext. 42632; Fax: +44-115-9709233; E-mail: richard.edwards{at}nottingham.ac.uk Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Edwards, R., Thirlwell, D. & Greenwood, D. (1996). Changes in ß-lactam antibiotic susceptibility and ß-lactamase production of clinical isolates of Bacteroides and Prevotella species over a 9 year period. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 37, 636–8.[Free Full Text]

2 . Thompson, J. S. & Malamy, M. H. (1990). Sequencing the gene for an imipenem-cefoxitin-hydrolyzing enzyme (CfiA) from Bacteroides fragilis TAL2480 reveals strong similarity between CfiA and Bacillus cereus ß-lactamase II. Journal of Bacteriology 172, 2584–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 . Podglajen, I., Breuil, J., Bordon, F., Gutmann, L. & Collatz, E. (1992). A silent carbapenemase gene in strains of Bacteroides fragilis can be expressed after a one-step mutation. FEMS Microbiology Letters 91, 21–30.

4 . Edwards, R. & Greenwood, D. (1992). An investigation of ß-lactamases from clinical isolates of Bacteroides species. Journal of Medical Microbiology 36, 89–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 . Turner, P., Edwards, R., Weston, V., Gazis, A., Ispahani, P. & Greenwood, D. (1995). Simultaneous resistance to metronidazole, co-amoxiclav and imipenem in clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis. Lancet 345, 1275–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 . Cuchural, G. J., Malamy, M. H. & Tally, F. P. (1986). ß-Lactamase-mediated imipenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 30,645 –8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 . Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A. et al. (1994). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology . Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York.

8 . Podglajen, I., Breuil, J., Casin, I. & Collatz, E. (1995). Genotypic identification of two groups within the species Bacteroides fragilis by ribotyping and by analysis of PCR-generated fragment patterns and insertion sequence content. Journal of Bacteriology 177, 5270–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 . Podglajen, I., Breuil, J. & Collatz, E. (1994). Insertion of a novel DNA sequence, IS1186, upstream of the silent carbapenemase gene cfiA, promotes expression of carbapenemase resistance in clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis. Molecular Microbiology 12, 105–14.[Web of Science][Medline]

10 . Bandoh, K., Ueno, K., Watanabe, K. & Kato, N. (1993). Susceptibility patterns and resistance to imipenem in the Bacteroides fragilis group species in Japan: a 4-year study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 16 , Suppl. A, S382–6.

Received 29 May 1998; returned 6 July 1998; revised 28 July 1998; accepted 21 September 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. L. Buckwold, N. B. Shoemaker, C. L. Sears, and A. A. Franco
Identification and Characterization of Conjugative Transposons CTn86 and CTn9343 in Bacteroides fragilis Strains
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2007; 73(1): 53 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. C. Rodloff, E. J. C. Goldstein, and A. Torres
Two decades of imipenem therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2006; 58(5): 916 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Gal and J. S. Brazier
Metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. carrying nim genes and the selection of slow-growing metronidazole-resistant mutants
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
J. Soki, E. Fodor, D. W. Hecht, R. Edwards, V. O. Rotimi, I. Kerekes, E. Urban, and E. Nagy
Molecular characterization of imipenem-resistant, cfiA-positive Bacteroides fragilis isolates from the USA, Hungary and Kuwait
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2004; 53(5): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
S. Piriz, S. Vadillo, A. Quesada, J. Criado, R. Cerrato, and J. Ayala
Relationship between penicillin-binding protein patterns and {beta}-lactamases in clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis with different susceptibility to {beta}-lactam antibiotics
J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2004; 53(3): 213 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. W. Hecht and J. R. Osmolski
Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) and Other Agents against Anaerobic Clinical Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2003; 47(3): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. Edwards and P. N. Read
Expression of the carbapenemase gene (cfiA) in Bacteroides fragilis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2000; 46(6): 1009 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
J. SOKI, E. URBAN, I. SZOKE, E. FODOR, and E. NAGY
Prevalence of the carbapenemase gene (cfiA) among clinical and normal flora isolates of Bacteroides species in Hungary
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2000; 49(5): 427 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?