Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on November 12, 2009

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkp406
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dkp406v2    most recent
dkp406v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sellier, E.
Right arrow Articles by François, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sellier, E.
Right arrow Articles by François, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Factors and outcomes associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients

Elodie Sellier1,2,*, Patricia Pavese3, Stéphane Gennai3, Jean-Paul Stahl3, José Labarère1,2 and Patrice François1,2

1 Quality of Care Unit, University Hospital, Grenoble, France 2 ThEMAS, TIMC, UMR CNRS Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France 3 Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Grenoble, France

Received 24 June 2009; returned 9 September 2009; revised 9 October 2009; accepted 13 October 2009


* Corresponding author. Quality of Care Unit, Pavillon Taillefer, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire BP 217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France. Tel: (+33) 4 76 76 53 46; Fax: (+33) 4 76 76 88 31; E-mail: ESellier{at}chu-grenoble.fr

Objectives: Solicited consultations constitute a substantial workload for infectious disease specialists (IDSs). The impact of physician adherence to recommendations on clinical outcomes following solicited IDS consultations has not been previously studied. The objectives of the study were to identify the factors associated with adherence and to determine whether adherence to recommendations was associated with better clinical outcomes.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 621 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalized in a university-affiliated hospital in France, who received an IDS consultation between December 2007 and June 2008. The main outcome was early clinical improvement, and the secondary outcomes were length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Results: Adherence to the IDS's recommendations was 88.2% (548/621) for antimicrobial treatment and 72.2% (317/439) for diagnostic or monitoring tests. In a multivariable analysis, independent factors of adherence to therapeutic recommendations were a community-acquired infection [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–3.0] and discontinuation or non-use of antibiotic treatment (adjusted OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.2–80.3). Adherence to recommendations for antibiotic treatment was associated with a higher rate of early clinical improvement (60.7% versus 43.9%, P = 0.01), shorter median length of stay (20 days versus 23 days, P = 0.03) and comparable in-hospital mortality (7.7% versus 5.5%, P = 0.50).

Conclusions: Factors associated with non-adherence must be anticipated by IDSs during consultations, because non-adherence leads to worse clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to identify the interventions that could improve physician adherence to recommendations made during solicited consultations.

Key Words: solicited consultations , informal consultations , antibiotics , diagnostic tests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.