JAC Advance Access published online on November 12, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkp398
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
Prosthetic joint infections: single versus combination therapy
Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-191-223-1248; Fax: +44-191-223-1224; E-mail: julie.samuel{at}nuth.nhs.uk
Prosthetic joint replacement is increasingly used to alleviate pain and increase mobility. Bone and joint infections remain a therapeutic dilemma for healthcare providers in all fields. Antimicrobial agents combined with appropriate surgical techniques play a vital role in eradicating infections associated with prosthetic joints. The question still remains whether monotherapy or combination therapy is effective in this situation because there is a paucity of well-defined comparative studies. We reviewed in vitro and in vivo studies evaluating the effectiveness of various antimicrobial agents either as single agents or in combination.
Key Words: PJIs , synergy , antagonism , antimicrobial combinations , time–kill experiments , bioavailability , pharmacokinetics , biofilms