Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on October 26, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 64(6):1282-1290; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp372
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/6/1282    most recent
dkp372v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helweg-Larsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helweg-Larsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Clinical efficacy of first- and second-line treatments for HIV-associated Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a tri-centre cohort study

Jannik Helweg-Larsen1,*, Thomas Benfield2,3, Chiara Atzori4 and Robert F. Miller5

1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Research Centre, Hvidovre University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 4 II Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy 5 Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK

Received 23 June 2009; returned 27 July 2009; revised 17 September 2009; accepted 22 September 2009


* Corresponding author. Tel: +45-35-45-17-58; Fax: +45-35-45-66-48; E-mail: jhelweg{at}dadlnet.dk

Objectives: First-line therapy for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Few data exist to guide the choice of second-line therapy for patients failing or developing toxicity to first-line therapy.

Methods: A case note review of 1122 patients with 1188 episodes of HIV-associated PCP from three observational cohorts in Copenhagen, London and Milan, between 1989 and 2004, was conducted.

Results: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (962 PCP episodes, 81%) was the most frequently used first-line therapy, followed by intravenous pentamidine (87 episodes, 7%), clindamycin/primaquine (72 episodes, 6%) and ‘other’ (atovaquone, dapsone/pyrimethamine, trimetrexate or inhaled pentamidine; 67 episodes, 6%). Rates of unchanged therapy were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole = 79%, clindamycin/primaquine = 65% and pentamidine = 60% (P < 0.001). First-line therapy was changed because of failure in 82 (7%) episodes and because of toxicity in 198 (17%) episodes. Three month survival rates were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole = 85%, clindamycin/primaquine = 81% and pentamidine = 76% (P = 0.09). After adjustment for possible confounders, pentamidine was associated with a significantly greater risk of death at 3 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–3.4]. Second-line therapy survival rates differed: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole = 85%; clindamycin/primaquine = 87%; and pentamidine = 60% (P = 0.01). Multivariable time-updated Cox regression analysis showed a greater risk of death associated with pentamidine (HR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.2–5.0), but not for clindamycin/primaquine, when both were compared with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Conclusions: Pentamidine was associated with a greater risk of death when used as first- and second-line therapy for HIV-associated PCP, and was associated with more treatment changes. Clindamycin/primaquine appeared superior to pentamidine as second-line therapy for PCP in patients failing or developing toxicity with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. In patients failing first-line treatment with non-trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole regimens, second-line therapy should be trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Keywords: PCP , pneumocystis , therapy , adverse drug reactions , HIV-1


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.