Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 64(3):571-573; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/3/571    most recent
dkp228v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elizondo, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elizondo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Therapeutic efficacy of voriconazole against a fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolate in a vaginal model

Gloria M. González*, Omar J. Portillo, Grecia I. Uscanga, Samantha E. Andrade, Miguel Robledo, Candelario Rodríguez and Mariana Elizondo

Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México

Received 31 March 2009; returned 13 May 2009; revised 5 June 2009; accepted 8 June 2009


* Corresponding author. Tel: +52-81-83294157; Fax: +52-81-83485477; E-mail: gmglez{at}yahoo.com.mx

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of oral versus intravaginal voriconazole and compare it with fluconazole for the treatment of experimental vaginitis caused by a fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolate.

Methods: Mice were treated with voriconazole at 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg once a day and 20 mg/kg twice a day or with fluconazole at 20 mg/kg once or twice a day orally. Intravaginal treatments were evaluated with voriconazole and fluconazole at 0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg once a day. All treatment regimens were given on days 1–5 post-challenge. One day 6, the vaginas were swabbed to assess treatment effects.

Results: Mice treated orally with voriconazole at ≥10 mg/kg and fluconazole at ≥20 mg/kg showed significantly reduced fungal counts over controls (P = 0.0002–0.007). Significant differences were found between the groups that received voriconazole at 20 mg/kg once or twice daily and those that received fluconazole at 20 mg/kg once or twice daily, orally (P = 0.010 and 0.001, respectively). Mice treated with voriconazole or fluconazole administered intravaginally at ≥0.5 mg/kg exhibited a reduced fungal burden when compared with the control group (P = 0.0002–0.007). There was no statistically significant difference in fungal burden between topical treatment with doses of 0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg once daily of voriconazole or fluconazole. Sterilization of vaginas was not observed with voriconazole and fluconazole without taking into consideration the therapeutic modality.

Conclusions: Voriconazole could emerge as a new alternative for treatment of vaginal candidosis.

Keywords: vaginal candidosis , vaginitis , murine model , C. albicans


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.