Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on June 11, 2009

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkp209
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/2/336    most recent
dkp209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, L.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, C.-H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, L.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, C.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae at a university hospital in Taiwan, 2000–07: impact of modified non-meningeal penicillin breakpoints in CLSI M100-S18

Lin-Hui Su1,2,{dagger}, Tsu-Lan Wu1,2,{dagger}, An-Jing Kuo1,2, Ju-Hsin Chia1,2 and Cheng-Hsun Chiu2,3,*

1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan 2 Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 259 Wenhua 1st Road, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan 3 Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Children's Hospital, 5 Fu-Hsin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

Received 22 September 2008; returned 30 December 2008; revised 15 April 2009; accepted 26 May 2009


* Corresponding author. Tel: +886-3-3281200, ext. 8896; Fax: +886-3-3288957; E-mail: chchiu{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw

Objectives: In 2008, a new set of penicillin breakpoints was published in the CLSI revised guideline, M100-S18, to define the susceptibility of non-meningeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The impact of the change is studied and discussed.

Methods: Laboratory data on pneumococcal isolates collected from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital during 2000–07 were analysed using the original and modified penicillin CLSI breakpoints.

Results: A total of 3729 non-duplicate isolates were identifed, including 43 (1.2%) meningeal isolates showing high rates of penicillin (79.1%) and ceftriaxone (34.9%) resistance. For non-meningeal isolates, penicillin non-susceptibility was reduced significantly from 75.1% (72.4% in 2000–03 increasing to 77.4% in 2004–07) to 16% (28.6% in 2000 decreasing to 2.4% in 2007) if the modified breakpoints were applied. However, isolates for which penicillin MICs were 1–2 mg/L increased significantly from 34.2% in 2000 to 59.8% in 2007. Ceftriaxone non-susceptibility also increased significantly from 2.8% before 2005 to 18.4% thereafter. A quarter (25.7%) of the pneumococcal isolates were recovered from patients <10 years old. Higher resistance to penicillin (89.8% versus 70.4%; or 19.1% versus 13.2% by the modified breakpoints) or ceftriaxone (11.1% versus 5.8%) was found among these isolates, compared with those from older patients.

Conclusions: With the implementation of the new breakpoints, clinicians may continue to use penicillin for the treatment of non-meningeal pneumococcal infections in preference to other drug classes. However, as isolates with borderline penicillin MICs are increasing, continued surveillance of pneumococcal susceptibility to penicillin will be needed.

Key Words: clinical outcomes , pneumococcal infections , ceftriaxone resistance


{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.