Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(4):769-772; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn272
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/4/769    most recent
dkn272v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bearden, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bearden, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Comparative in vitro activities of topical wound care products against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

David T. Bearden1,*, George P. Allen1 and J. Mark Christensen2

1 Oregon State University College of Pharmacy at Oregon Health and Science University, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, CH12C, Portland, OR 97239, USA 2 Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 203 Pharmacy Building, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA

Received 21 March 2008; returned 22 May 2008; revised 6 June 2008; accepted 11 June 2008

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-503-494-0116; Fax: +1-503-494-8797; E-mail: beardend{at}ohsu.edu

Objectives: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for an increasing number of skin infections. Over-the-counter topical wound care products may play a role in the prevention of these infections, but limited data are available regarding their activity. The current study utilized a modified time–kill design to evaluate the activity of three over-the-counter topical wound care products (benzethonium chloride/essential oils, neomycin/polymyxin B and polymyxin B/gramicidin) against four unique isolates (three USA 300 and one USA 400).

Methods: All experiments were performed using commercially available formulations. Bactericidal activity was defined as a sustained 3 log10 reduction in cfu/mL from the initial inoculum. Reductions in bacterial counts between agents were determined using analysis of variance.

Results: At 10 min, the reduction (mean ± SD) in log10 cfu/mL for all strains was 2.87 ± 1.22, 1.86 ± 0.76 and 0.143 ± 0.82 for benzethonium chloride/essential oils, neomycin/polymyxin B and polymyxin B/gramicidin, respectively. By 24 h, bactericidal activity was observed against two strains each for neomycin/polymyxin B and polymyxin B/gramicidin. Benzethonium chloride/essential oils was bactericidal against all strains by 6 h. At 24 h, all three agents were superior to controls (P < 0.05). Benzethonium chloride/essential oils was more active at 24 h than polymyxin B/gramicidin versus all four strains (P < 0.05) and more active than neomycin/polymyxin B versus three of four strains (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: These topical agents demonstrated variable activity against the four strains tested. Benzethonium chloride/essential oils was more rapidly and completely active than the other agents tested.

Keywords: MRSA , community-acquired infections , antimicrobial activity , skin infections


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.